Re: [Idr] IPR call and WG LC for draft-ietf-idr-bgpls-srv6-ext-04.txt (11/1/2020 to 11/16/2020)

Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com> Thu, 12 November 2020 21:45 UTC

Return-Path: <shares@ndzh.com>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 829183A09AD for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 12 Nov 2020 13:45:14 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 1.225
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.225 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DOS_OUTLOOK_TO_MX=2.845, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, KHOP_HELO_FCRDNS=0.276, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZHoU_bzcWXOk for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 12 Nov 2020 13:45:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: from hickoryhill-consulting.com (50-245-122-97-static.hfc.comcastbusiness.net [50.245.122.97]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ABFC53A0CEE for <idr@ietf.org>; Thu, 12 Nov 2020 13:44:47 -0800 (PST)
X-Default-Received-SPF: pass (skip=forwardok (res=PASS)) x-ip-name=50.107.115.222;
From: "Susan Hares" <shares@ndzh.com>
To: "'Pablo Camarillo \(pcamaril\)'" <pcamaril@cisco.com>, <idr@ietf.org>
References: <045d01d6b0c7$c5eb4900$51c1db00$@ndzh.com> <SA2PR11MB50829993671A72401C45076BC9E80@SA2PR11MB5082.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <SA2PR11MB50829993671A72401C45076BC9E80@SA2PR11MB5082.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2020 16:44:21 -0500
Message-ID: <035801d6b93d$00612b40$012381c0$@ndzh.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0359_01D6B913.178C82D0"
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Thread-Index: AQG9Ozo0iT1RvIbU61nS0IwA0pAXSAIqV80BqeawgDA=
Content-Language: en-us
X-Antivirus: AVG (VPS 201112-6, 11/12/2020), Outbound message
X-Antivirus-Status: Not-Tested
X-Authenticated-User: skh@ndzh.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/3V-jRM9khyx7XLU_IygYk25as0M>
Subject: Re: [Idr] IPR call and WG LC for draft-ietf-idr-bgpls-srv6-ext-04.txt (11/1/2020 to 11/16/2020)
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2020 21:45:15 -0000

Pablo: 

 

Would you mind updating the wiki with the information on GoBMP? 

You can use a datatracker ID to sign into the IDR wiki. 

 

If you have any trouble, please send me the link to information on GoBMP.

 

Thank you, Susan Hares 

 

From: Pablo Camarillo (pcamaril) [mailto:pcamaril@cisco.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, November 11, 2020 3:03 PM
To: Susan Hares; idr@ietf.org
Subject: RE: [Idr] IPR call and WG LC for
draft-ietf-idr-bgpls-srv6-ext-04.txt (11/1/2020 to 11/16/2020)

 

Hi,

 

I believe this document is ready to move forward.

As per your question a) on SRv6 status, note that there has been a
significant number of deployments.
(draft-matsushima-spring-srv6-deployment-status-08)

Also I would like to note that there is an additional opensource
implementation of this document, GoBMP, which does not seem to be listed in
the wiki. (https://github.com/sbezverk/gobmp)

 

Thank you,

Pablo.

 

From: Idr <idr-bounces@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Susan Hares
Sent: lunes, 2 de noviembre de 2020 4:25
To: idr@ietf.org
Subject: [Idr] IPR call and WG LC for draft-ietf-idr-bgpls-srv6-ext-04.txt
(11/1/2020 to 11/16/2020)

 

This begins an IPR call and a 2 week WG LC for 

draft-ietf-idr-bgpls-srv6-ext-04.txt (11/1 to 11/16/2020) 

 

You can access the draft at: 

 <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-idr-bgp-ls-flex-algo/>
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-idr-bgp-ls-flex-algo/

 

This draft focus on the BGP-LS support for SRv6. 

Spring has proposed the SRv6 support in RFC8402 

(see section 3.1.3 for mechanisms and section 8.2 for 

Security considerations).  

 

There are two implementations: Cisco and GoBGP 

You can see the implementation report at: 

 
<https://trac.ietf.org/trac/idr/wiki/draft-ietf-idr-bgpls-srv6-ext%20impleme
ntations>
https://trac.ietf.org/trac/idr/wiki/draft-ietf-idr-bgpls-srv6-ext%20implemen
tations

 

In your responses, please consider the following questions: 

a) Is the SRv6 technology ready for deployment or 

are there known issues? 

 

b) Will SRv6 provide valuable support for 

deployments of BGP-LS in support of source routing 

(aka spring)? 

 

c) Is this draft ready for publication? 

 

If you know of additional implementations, please send

a note to the idr chairs with the information or 

respond to this email. 

 

Cheers, Susan Hares