Re: [Idr] IPR call and WG LC for draft-ietf-idr-bgpls-srv6-ext-04.txt (11/1/2020 to 11/16/2020)

Susan Hares <> Thu, 12 November 2020 21:45 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 829183A09AD for <>; Thu, 12 Nov 2020 13:45:14 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 1.225
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.225 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DOS_OUTLOOK_TO_MX=2.845, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, KHOP_HELO_FCRDNS=0.276, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZHoU_bzcWXOk for <>; Thu, 12 Nov 2020 13:45:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ABFC53A0CEE for <>; Thu, 12 Nov 2020 13:44:47 -0800 (PST)
X-Default-Received-SPF: pass (skip=forwardok (res=PASS)) x-ip-name=;
From: Susan Hares <>
To: "'Pablo Camarillo (pcamaril)'" <>,
References: <045d01d6b0c7$c5eb4900$51c1db00$> <>
In-Reply-To: <>
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2020 16:44:21 -0500
Message-ID: <035801d6b93d$00612b40$012381c0$>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0359_01D6B913.178C82D0"
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Thread-Index: AQG9Ozo0iT1RvIbU61nS0IwA0pAXSAIqV80BqeawgDA=
Content-Language: en-us
X-Antivirus: AVG (VPS 201112-6, 11/12/2020), Outbound message
X-Antivirus-Status: Not-Tested
Archived-At: <>
Subject: Re: [Idr] IPR call and WG LC for draft-ietf-idr-bgpls-srv6-ext-04.txt (11/1/2020 to 11/16/2020)
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2020 21:45:15 -0000



Would you mind updating the wiki with the information on GoBMP? 

You can use a datatracker ID to sign into the IDR wiki. 


If you have any trouble, please send me the link to information on GoBMP.


Thank you, Susan Hares 


From: Pablo Camarillo (pcamaril) [] 
Sent: Wednesday, November 11, 2020 3:03 PM
To: Susan Hares;
Subject: RE: [Idr] IPR call and WG LC for
draft-ietf-idr-bgpls-srv6-ext-04.txt (11/1/2020 to 11/16/2020)




I believe this document is ready to move forward.

As per your question a) on SRv6 status, note that there has been a
significant number of deployments.

Also I would like to note that there is an additional opensource
implementation of this document, GoBMP, which does not seem to be listed in
the wiki. (


Thank you,



From: Idr <> On Behalf Of Susan Hares
Sent: lunes, 2 de noviembre de 2020 4:25
Subject: [Idr] IPR call and WG LC for draft-ietf-idr-bgpls-srv6-ext-04.txt
(11/1/2020 to 11/16/2020)


This begins an IPR call and a 2 week WG LC for 

draft-ietf-idr-bgpls-srv6-ext-04.txt (11/1 to 11/16/2020) 


You can access the draft at: 



This draft focus on the BGP-LS support for SRv6. 

Spring has proposed the SRv6 support in RFC8402 

(see section 3.1.3 for mechanisms and section 8.2 for 

Security considerations).  


There are two implementations: Cisco and GoBGP 

You can see the implementation report at: 



In your responses, please consider the following questions: 

a) Is the SRv6 technology ready for deployment or 

are there known issues? 


b) Will SRv6 provide valuable support for 

deployments of BGP-LS in support of source routing 

(aka spring)? 


c) Is this draft ready for publication? 


If you know of additional implementations, please send

a note to the idr chairs with the information or 

respond to this email. 


Cheers, Susan Hares