Re: [Idr] I-D Action: draft-zzd-idr-sr-policy-scheduling-02.txt

Joel Halpern <jmh@joelhalpern.com> Sat, 29 July 2023 15:49 UTC

Return-Path: <jmh@joelhalpern.com>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68288C151549 for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 29 Jul 2023 08:49:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.196
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.196 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.091, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=joelhalpern.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id unuhe79_a2yo for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 29 Jul 2023 08:49:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailb2.tigertech.net (mailb2.tigertech.net [208.80.4.154]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6D623C151546 for <idr@ietf.org>; Sat, 29 Jul 2023 08:49:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mailb2.tigertech.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4RCppM6TWgz1nsyM for <idr@ietf.org>; Sat, 29 Jul 2023 08:49:15 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=joelhalpern.com; s=2.tigertech; t=1690645755; bh=LOKXnVXjI9iA76ec91nD5yYESXLZNI7vI1G5c3/mMfc=; h=Date:Subject:To:References:From:In-Reply-To:From; b=PUdY6FtVB9BAfiLFS9mu66X2Pb9Sj7NUnLCz9kFuv7kd/KjClqzoxFcHNL0YPJo4Y 5uaOlqpzbBCrSrWEWbppZ+4qW96D2g78+Lk0/VHKa8aNBKyW6f6uKpKwMvA69ojML3 wetEGypXnazTpazA1V10roLtb5luY76giW63HnoA=
X-Quarantine-ID: <105Ra4ieGknN>
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at b2.tigertech.net
Received: from [192.168.63.77] (unknown [50.204.119.4]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mailb2.tigertech.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4RCppM3Zn7z1nsqR for <idr@ietf.org>; Sat, 29 Jul 2023 08:49:15 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <986f652a-c39f-2aa3-7a86-544fc6c79aaf@joelhalpern.com>
Date: Sat, 29 Jul 2023 11:49:11 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.13.0
To: "idr@ietf.org" <idr@ietf.org>
References: <169061236318.53789.7827529088930227154@ietfa.amsl.com>
Content-Language: en-US
From: Joel Halpern <jmh@joelhalpern.com>
In-Reply-To: <169061236318.53789.7827529088930227154@ietfa.amsl.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/3XmvSCZa4XvvvbhGRZTu2lq7n30>
Subject: Re: [Idr] I-D Action: draft-zzd-idr-sr-policy-scheduling-02.txt
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 29 Jul 2023 15:49:20 -0000

I would expect that work on responding to predictable changes in 
scheduled activity would start from the work going on in TVR, and 
modeling or using that in IDR would follow after.

Yours,

Joel

On 7/29/2023 2:32 AM, internet-drafts@ietf.org wrote:
> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts
> directories.
>
>     Title           : BGP SR Policy Extensions for Path Scheduling
>     Authors         : Li Zhang
>                       Tianran Zhou
>                       Jie Dong
>                       Minxue Wang
>                       Nkosinathi Nzima
>     Filename        : draft-zzd-idr-sr-policy-scheduling-02.txt
>     Pages           : 10
>     Date            : 2023-07-28
>
> Abstract:
>     Path scheduling is required in many network scenarios.  For example,
>     some links or nodes will be shut down in the tidal network when the
>     traffic decreases, which may lead to the expiration of some routing
>     paths.
>
>     This document proposes extensions to BGP SR Policy to indicate the
>     effective time and expiration time for routing paths to enable path
>     scheduling.
>
> The IETF datatracker status page for this Internet-Draft is:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-zzd-idr-sr-policy-scheduling/
>
> There is also an HTML version available at:
> https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-zzd-idr-sr-policy-scheduling-02.html
>
> A diff from the previous version is available at:
> https://author-tools.ietf.org/iddiff?url2=draft-zzd-idr-sr-policy-scheduling-02
>
> Internet-Drafts are also available by rsync at rsync.ietf.org::internet-drafts
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> I-D-Announce mailing list
> I-D-Announce@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i-d-announce
> Internet-Draft directories: http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html
> or ftp://ftp.ietf.org/ietf/1shadow-sites.txt