Re: [Idr] Vendor Defaults (was Re: Review of draft-ietf-large-community-06.txt)
heasley <heas@shrubbery.net> Mon, 07 November 2016 17:38 UTC
Return-Path: <heas@shrubbery.net>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9384512959C for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 7 Nov 2016 09:38:15 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.699
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.497, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tlU6ynM0edg5 for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 7 Nov 2016 09:38:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: from guelah.shrubbery.net (guelah.shrubbery.net [198.58.5.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E84EE1293F4 for <idr@ietf.org>; Mon, 7 Nov 2016 09:38:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: by guelah.shrubbery.net (Postfix, from userid 7053) id 65A4F7C061; Mon, 7 Nov 2016 17:38:11 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2016 17:38:11 +0000
From: heasley <heas@shrubbery.net>
To: Gert Doering <gert@space.net>
Message-ID: <20161107173811.GA62252@shrubbery.net>
References: <CAH1iCiq6jNtnkta0Bt952EQ9zOKSGt=_cCySsT5XuOKuHYO2nQ@mail.gmail.com> <86860386-9C2B-4BD5-B457-2A6DA5446CF3@cisco.com> <20161106040849.GB18931@shrubbery.net> <20161107121459.GU79185@Space.Net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20161107121459.GU79185@Space.Net>
X-PGPkey: http://www.shrubbery.net/~heas/public-key.asc
X-note: live free, or die!
X-homer: i just want to have a beer while i am caring.
X-Claimation: an engineer needs a manager like a fish needs a bicycle
X-reality: only YOU can put an end to the embarrassment that is Tom Cruise
User-Agent: Mutt/1.6.1 (2016-04-27)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/3hqfGGr_TafYSJs2vGAl5ZZ9kN4>
Cc: heasley <heas@shrubbery.net>, "idr@ietf.org" <idr@ietf.org>, Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net>
Subject: Re: [Idr] Vendor Defaults (was Re: Review of draft-ietf-large-community-06.txt)
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2016 17:38:15 -0000
Mon, Nov 07, 2016 at 01:14:59PM +0100, Gert Doering: > Hi, > > On Sun, Nov 06, 2016 at 04:08:49AM +0000, heasley wrote: > > If you consider draft-grow-bgp-reject, does that change your opinion about > > filtering needing to be the default? > > IOS XR is doing exactly that. What is your point? XR is Jakob's attention, but IOS{-XE} and others do not. but, the point is that if, by implementing that draft (or by having already implemented that draft in the case of XR), the implementation is not leaking communities (or any NLRI) and requires RPL to do so. Since the suggested argument for existance of this 'send-communities' knob was to require configuration to send-communities - it is redundant, policy is already required to send (or rx) any NLRI. Not sending communities by default is a problem for leaf networks (eg CLECs, regional telephone companies) that are behind ISPs who do not understand routing well. I do not see a disadvantage (or sum of) that is greater than this advantatge.
- [Idr] Vendor Defaults (was Re: Review of draft-ie… Brian Dickson
- Re: [Idr] Vendor Defaults (was Re: Review of draf… Jakob Heitz (jheitz)
- Re: [Idr] Vendor Defaults (was Re: Review of draf… Robert Raszuk
- Re: [Idr] Vendor Defaults (was Re: Review of draf… heasley
- Re: [Idr] Vendor Defaults (was Re: Review of draf… Jakob Heitz (jheitz)
- Re: [Idr] Vendor Defaults (was Re: Review of draf… Jakob Heitz (jheitz)
- Re: [Idr] Vendor Defaults (was Re: Review of draf… Jeffrey Haas
- Re: [Idr] Vendor Defaults (was Re: Review of draf… Robert Raszuk
- Re: [Idr] Vendor Defaults (was Re: Review of draf… Brian Dickson
- Re: [Idr] Vendor Defaults (was Re: Review of draf… Robert Raszuk
- Re: [Idr] Vendor Defaults (was Re: Review of draf… Jakob Heitz (jheitz)
- Re: [Idr] Vendor Defaults (was Re: Review of draf… Robert Raszuk
- Re: [Idr] Vendor Defaults (was Re: Review of draf… Jakob Heitz (jheitz)
- Re: [Idr] Vendor Defaults (was Re: Review of draf… Robert Raszuk
- Re: [Idr] Vendor Defaults (was Re: Review of draf… martijnschmidt
- Re: [Idr] Vendor Defaults (was Re: Review of draf… Brian Dickson
- Re: [Idr] Vendor Defaults (was Re: Review of draf… Peter Hessler
- Re: [Idr] Vendor Defaults (was Re: Review of draf… Gert Doering
- Re: [Idr] Vendor Defaults (was Re: Review of draf… Gert Doering
- Re: [Idr] Vendor Defaults (was Re: Review of draf… Gert Doering
- Re: [Idr] Vendor Defaults (was Re: Review of draf… Robert Raszuk
- Re: [Idr] Vendor Defaults (was Re: Review of draf… Jared Mauch
- Re: [Idr] Vendor Defaults (was Re: Review of draf… Dickinson, Ian
- Re: [Idr] Vendor Defaults (was Re: Review of draf… Gert Doering
- Re: [Idr] Vendor Defaults (was Re: Review of draf… Jeffrey Haas
- Re: [Idr] Vendor Defaults (was Re: Review of draf… Jakob Heitz (jheitz)
- Re: [Idr] Vendor Defaults (was Re: Review of draf… Gert Doering
- Re: [Idr] Vendor Defaults (was Re: Review of draf… Robert Raszuk
- Re: [Idr] Vendor Defaults (was Re: Review of draf… Jeffrey Haas
- Re: [Idr] Vendor Defaults (was Re: Review of draf… Job Snijders
- Re: [Idr] Vendor Defaults (was Re: Review of draf… heasley
- Re: [Idr] Vendor Defaults (was Re: Review of draf… t.petch
- Re: [Idr] Vendor Defaults (was Re: Review of draf… heasley
- Re: [Idr] Vendor Defaults (was Re: Review of draf… heasley
- Re: [Idr] Vendor Defaults (was Re: Review of draf… Brian Dickson
- Re: [Idr] Vendor Defaults (was Re: Review of draf… Robert Raszuk
- Re: [Idr] Vendor Defaults (was Re: Review of draf… Brian Dickson
- Re: [Idr] Vendor Defaults (was Re: Review of draf… Brian Dickson
- Re: [Idr] Vendor Defaults (was Re: Review of draf… Robert Raszuk
- Re: [Idr] Vendor Defaults (was Re: Review of draf… heasley
- Re: [Idr] Vendor Defaults (was Re: Review of draf… Robert Raszuk
- Re: [Idr] Vendor Defaults (was Re: Review of draf… Brian Dickson
- Re: [Idr] Vendor Defaults (was Re: Review of draf… Gert Doering