[Idr] Re: Shepherd's review - draft-ietf-idr-bgpls-sr-vtn-mt-04 -
Chongfeng Xie <chongfeng.xie@foxmail.com> Mon, 02 September 2024 12:01 UTC
Return-Path: <chongfeng.xie@foxmail.com>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B357C180B50 for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 2 Sep 2024 05:01:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.828
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.828 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HELO_DYNAMIC_IPADDR=1.951, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, RDNS_DYNAMIC=0.982, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=foxmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9JQLlfzOACkK for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 2 Sep 2024 05:01:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out203-205-221-153.mail.qq.com (out203-205-221-153.mail.qq.com [203.205.221.153]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-ECDSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 45406C1516F3 for <idr@ietf.org>; Mon, 2 Sep 2024 05:01:07 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=foxmail.com; s=s201512; t=1725278453; bh=zFPTFDI1zBiUgpxAT7ItV2Q7JM4VBWsnG8wwmnq85g8=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References; b=jM25ONlaI3sJ82CxPhR7TRJWvKb0U7WbLJu/ztA7XlHRq+QHMHw3xtO/0iYtvb6xG q6pZ8ODT+XU6VSynAcul8tfsSSbai2Dm5HbbwiHRmUlIblMNPYO9761P72H9E51io+ 2oKIT8V9QHz3aahk/z9aYl05gLZLws2ePRCaF5zU=
Received: from LAPTOP-BOBOCIFS ([124.127.65.45]) by newxmesmtplogicsvrsza29-0.qq.com (NewEsmtp) with SMTP id D67AA4D9; Mon, 02 Sep 2024 19:53:39 +0800
X-QQ-mid: xmsmtpt1725278019tropgor5o
Message-ID: <tencent_EBAC56E55DA1433EE97504A00EC79AD95506@qq.com>
X-QQ-XMAILINFO: MqG4KXyEKpQyc29luMznEQpuAgnVmUyvTNgUHC/ufolwgclpKLWbcemRm936nq iDRlb794vjd7X5666NEGGbIYo4UHHRHfhjD+UginNBiLrYEK4GvQW2vyegVACEPiHYODJepNzzG3 thCVpd9fmi0Zne1rk+ByrNQDuN2Elde6hBMFTFby2dIy4hFwTBjISX4/V1StP0aZHceojlit3BS/ FWg1+H8gjQIGPCKcM16vgMJV5OM4hzT1ZRHF9TfaDFEgbBKedSX2sCWQqQ6syncG6bI77v7CZV5h FyovVTHZoe5IDhGQ8dlx425kI+4wO+HhGsSXZnFC/BEudmSiCt38Z6ZtUl2ckTCWp+o+MYJeBClk LCgyAfvA9UEvaH7AaSLuV3einFiSrQ3KhN1qfixpYJtf0ZRJQz1h9hvUbv/69uj0FP7JnHys3AGW +SyqjZFq5O4BEvv966EwCHsa4ccAKMJ8v3Pgawcx93avGn+yIPAYSmNHJK8t7ihyrEqpBK5saXAX P6ukxutcDmUtlAvPI54bUIdQDvkdzUvIXY2247u6UEBg3GSF/L3jMyR+gElctrsWMXiIgkH7LHpF HWuxajk+QKXjRfNAWOO8FfoCcge7VckS2DgaAwFCVFrUVcvUYddnWH8Ybm8fYSVVfQNZ2jW3K2Tv IpqUq1o76yPl3Lfk63/g6BcImMMLjPCHanM+CXdeHjB2vT+F3iy3m8iEPAxYSi1HHrjmFIz2UMGI WCTFLfXAM+K7QhaOxJMcsZlfzfBM9PpAjd1v3sF/bbRUxk+3fn6M97nlq+pAh2fKAJ31a8wwEb1u DqQrhqiPqnPh+GFiyKTeQO7Ds+b6B4H2obeGDWLmqjVDq2TbeuQ1ICV/CKVj9I51RG2YQMlxjhAC mS7mCg/Wggnsq9rHVf/AQPuznYQ05dESNh3p9Z01b4HbGx3QWqp0yogkrOCc7LdhbmaDJt2GuEez W72hvncme8Y+rZpcI4qhwmfnnuXPDRxwQEQvECcS1VDc4IphCRdAk6OkU8puoTHR2hvYhyxmLK0q QwpQPn3f0iKqJ3g4XNFEnD99Vd9ayoJkHTC581PDnsoVWIrfnd6fPdfj9nLp8=
X-QQ-XMRINFO: NS+P29fieYNw95Bth2bWPxk=
Date: Mon, 02 Sep 2024 19:53:40 +0800
From: Chongfeng Xie <chongfeng.xie@foxmail.com>
To: Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com>, idr <idr@ietf.org>
References: <CO1PR08MB6611239C963DAC95E553989AB3922@CO1PR08MB6611.namprd08.prod.outlook.com>
X-Priority: 3
X-GUID: FEE68DC4-250E-4813-B975-721FE4C1AD0D
X-Has-Attach: no
X-Mailer: Foxmail 7.2.25.306[cn]
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-OQ-MSGID: <2024090219533932756414@foxmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_001_NextPart632004722044_=----"
Message-ID-Hash: QG2XGWURPBHFIJQHISJEVAQQCRXFBEF2
X-Message-ID-Hash: QG2XGWURPBHFIJQHISJEVAQQCRXFBEF2
X-MailFrom: chongfeng.xie@foxmail.com
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-idr.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: Li Cong <licong@chinatelecom.cn>, xiechf <xiechf@chinatelecom.cn>
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc4
Precedence: list
Subject: [Idr] Re: Shepherd's review - draft-ietf-idr-bgpls-sr-vtn-mt-04 -
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/3xPdPPfVZXq2KqWCcE8T9Bfshj4>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:idr-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:idr-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:idr-leave@ietf.org>
Hi Sue, Thank you very much for your review and revisions made. Yes, we wish to start WG LC after we made changes to the document, the new version will be submitted soon. Best regards Chongfeng From: Susan Hares Date: 2024-09-02 18:13 To: idr@ietf.org CC: Dongjie (Jimmy); licong@chinatelecom.cn; chongfeng.xie@foxmail.com; Chongfeng XIE; Lizhenbin Subject: Shepherd's review - draft-ietf-idr-bgpls-sr-vtn-mt-04 - Chongfeng, Cong, Jie and Robin: This message contains my shepherd’s review for draft-ietf-idr-bgpls-sr-vtn-mt-04. This draft is almost ready to go through WG LC. The draft has 8 minor English improvements that could be made. Do you wish to start WG LC after you make these few minor changes to the document? Cheerily, Sue ============= Shepherd Review for: draft-ietf-idr-bgpls-sr-vtn-mt-04 status: WG Draft (last publication 11/22/2022), expired Status: Informational. version: revision suggested (The content is OK, but a few editorial suggestions are made.) early allocation: none Editorial: 1. Abstract, sentence 1, incorrect use of "etc" Old text:/ Enhanced VPNs aim to deliver VPN services with enhanced characteristics, such as guaranteed resources, latency, jitter, etc., so as to support customers requirements for connectivity services with these enhanced characteristics./ New text:/ Enhanced VPNs aim to deliver VPN services with enhanced characteristics to connect customers who require specific guaranteed resources, latency, or jitter./ 2. Introduction, sentence 1, incorrect use of "etc." Old text:/ Enhanced VPNs aim to deliver VPN services with enhanced characteristics, such as guaranteed resources, latency, jitter, etc., so as to support customers requirements for connectivity services with these enhanced characteristics./ New text:/ Enhanced VPNs aim to deliver VPN services with enhanced characteristics to connect customers who require specific guaranteed resources, latency, or jitter./ 3. Introduction, paragraph 4, incorrect capitalization Old text:/ To allow NRP-specific constraint-based path computation and/or NRP- specific shortest path computation to be performed by network controller and network nodes, The set of resource-awere SR SIDs and the associated topology and resource attributes of an NRP need to be distributed using a control plane./ New text:/ To allow NRP-specific constraint-based path computation and/or NRP- specific shortest path computation to be performed by network controller and network nodes, the set of resource-awere SR SIDs and the associated topology and resource attributes of an NRP need to be distributed using a control plane./ 4. Introduction, paragraph 5, sentence clarity Current:/ [I-D.ietf-lsr-isis-sr-vtn-mt] describes the IGP Multi- Topology (MT) [RFC5120] based mechanism to advertise the topology and the associated SR SIDs, together with the resource and TE attributes for each SR based NRP./ New:/ [I-D.ietf-lsr-isis-sr-vtn-mt] describes the IGP Multi- Topology (MT) [RFC5120] based mechanism to advertise an independent topology and the associated SR SIDs, together with the resource and TE attributes for each SR based NRP. / 5. Section 2.2, paragraph 4, sub-paragraph 1, starting with "One EBGP" Problem: clarity in sentence due to "comma". Current text:/ In both cases, different BGP Peer-Adj-SIDs or SRv6 End.X SID need to be allocated to each underlying physical or virtual member link, the association between the BGP Peer Adj-SID/ End.X SID and the MT-ID of the NRP need to be advertised by the ASBR./ Current text:/ In both cases, different BGP Peer-Adj-SIDs or SRv6 End.X SID need to be allocated to each underlying physical or virtual member link, and the association between the BGP Peer Adj-SID/ End.X SID and the MT-ID of the NRP need to be advertised by the ASBR./ 6. section 4, paragraph 1, clarity due to "comma" old text:/ For example, even if multiple NRPs share the same topology, each NRP still need to be identified using a unique MT-ID in the control plane, thus independent path computation needs be executed for each NRP. new text:/ For example, even if multiple NRPs share the same topology, each NRP still need to be identified using a unique MT-ID in the control plane. Thus independent path computation needs be executed for each NRP. / 7. Section 4, paragraph 1, - ", as no" - please review word choice Old text:/ The mechanism described in this document is considered useful for network scenarios in which the required number of NRPs is small, as no control protocol extension is required. / A more normal word choice would be "because" as shown below, but you may wish ", as no". New text: / The mechanism described in this document is considered useful for network scenarios in which the required number of NRPs is small because no control protocol extension is required. / 8. Section 4, paragraph 1, Current text: For network scenarios where the number of required NRPs is large, more scalable solution would be needed, which may require further protocol extensions and enhancements. / New text:/ For network scenarios where the number of required NRPs is large, more scalable solution would be needed which may require further protocol extensions and enhancements. /
- [Idr] Shepherd's review - draft-ietf-idr-bgpls-sr… Susan Hares
- [Idr] Re: Shepherd's review - draft-ietf-idr-bgpl… Chongfeng Xie
- [Idr] Re: Shepherd's review - draft-ietf-idr-bgpl… Susan Hares
- [Idr] Re: Shepherd's review - draft-ietf-idr-bgpl… Chongfeng Xie
- [Idr] Re: Shepherd's review - draft-ietf-idr-bgpl… Susan Hares
- [Idr] Re: Shepherd's review - draft-ietf-idr-bgpl… Chongfeng Xie