Re: [Idr] Call for implementation information on drafts past WG LC

"Serpil Bayraktar (serpil)" <serpil@cisco.com> Wed, 02 January 2019 19:26 UTC

Return-Path: <serpil@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0818130F01 for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 2 Jan 2019 11:26:15 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.565
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.565 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.065, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XjxLph0h9Okr for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 2 Jan 2019 11:26:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: from alln-iport-8.cisco.com (alln-iport-8.cisco.com [173.37.142.95]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0DECF130ED4 for <idr@ietf.org>; Wed, 2 Jan 2019 11:26:14 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=7798; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1546457174; x=1547666774; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=2AOe/oZ+t+kETY2Efm+nZw+9bsLOCEGMqA+1RqLcz/Y=; b=cB7SAMMfgw/X1QVdl1Y/+Z/TdeX9Wrgg7+I0MLzxe9coI2MbNbZFeUk3 NQPSeh5XA6JjgTEGhGdXb/o0d6KVPGUJjTPhzK31xRtydemmkspYmvl3w JNbDkoDTlEOKxzSxVFEyJKvex52xTdTb0f+6e9y64ZXmez+jTeYc7VpRB I=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A0ALAAAODy1c/40NJK1jGgEBAQEBAgE?= =?us-ascii?q?BAQEHAgEBAQGBUwMBAQEBCwGBDXZmgQInCoN1k36CDZIHhVyBewsBARgBCoR?= =?us-ascii?q?JAheBYiI2Bw0BAwEBAgEBAm0cDIVKAQEBBAEBGwZLCxACAQgOAwMBAigDAgI?= =?us-ascii?q?CJQsUCQgCBAENBYMiAYEdZA+nBIEvhUGEWgWMPxeBf4E4H4IXBy6DHgEBggE?= =?us-ascii?q?WglKCVwKPSpIBCQKRZxiRZolZkCkCERSBJyYGK4FWcBU7KgGCQYschT9BMYo?= =?us-ascii?q?ngR8BAQ?=
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.56,432,1539648000"; d="scan'208,217";a="220253853"
Received: from alln-core-8.cisco.com ([173.36.13.141]) by alln-iport-8.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 02 Jan 2019 19:26:13 +0000
Received: from XCH-ALN-014.cisco.com (xch-aln-014.cisco.com [173.36.7.24]) by alln-core-8.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id x02JQCH4002504 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Wed, 2 Jan 2019 19:26:13 GMT
Received: from xch-aln-014.cisco.com (173.36.7.24) by XCH-ALN-014.cisco.com (173.36.7.24) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1395.4; Wed, 2 Jan 2019 13:26:12 -0600
Received: from xch-aln-014.cisco.com ([173.36.7.24]) by XCH-ALN-014.cisco.com ([173.36.7.24]) with mapi id 15.00.1395.000; Wed, 2 Jan 2019 13:26:12 -0600
From: "Serpil Bayraktar (serpil)" <serpil@cisco.com>
To: Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com>, "'Jeffrey Haas'" <jhaas@pfrc.org>
CC: "idr@ietf.org" <idr@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Idr] Call for implementation information on drafts past WG LC
Thread-Index: AQHTmVwcqLdrMfR9EQnRXZXOnZ5CSwHOnt0LpY/yeoD//+ZbgA==
Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2019 19:26:12 +0000
Message-ID: <16F0C5DE-6BE0-44A6-A969-84854840653E@cisco.com>
References: <007901d4a2a1$d31ffbb0$795ff310$@ndzh.com> <20190102175814.GA18854@pfrc.org> <003201d4a2cd$7eb518e0$7c1f4aa0$@ndzh.com>
In-Reply-To: <003201d4a2cd$7eb518e0$7c1f4aa0$@ndzh.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/10.10.4.181110
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.157.20.67]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_16F0C5DE6BE044A6A96984854840653Eciscocom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 173.36.7.24, xch-aln-014.cisco.com
X-Outbound-Node: alln-core-8.cisco.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/4rdIzH_FJiSIpaSX_pFZJBDyBuU>
Subject: Re: [Idr] Call for implementation information on drafts past WG LC
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Jan 2019 19:26:16 -0000

Cisco has an implementation of draft-ietf-bgp-optimal-route-reflection-17.txt  as well.

Serpil

From: Idr <idr-bounces@ietf.org> on behalf of Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com>
Date: Wednesday, January 2, 2019 at 11:01 AM
To: "jhaas@pfrc.org" <jhaas@pfrc.org>
Cc: "idr@ietf.org" <idr@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Idr] Call for implementation information on drafts past WG LC

Jeff:

Thank you letting me know regarding the following implementations:

<snip>
          draft-ietf-idr-bgp-bestpath-selection-criteria  (Juniper
implementation, report 2 weeks pending)
          draft-ietf-idr-rtc-no-rt-10.txt (in early 2019 release)
          draft-ietf-bgp-optimal-route-reflection-17.txt  (supported)


-- Jeff

_______________________________________________
Idr mailing list
Idr@ietf.org<mailto:Idr@ietf.org>
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr