[Idr] Martin Vigoureux's No Objection on draft-ietf-idr-bgpls-segment-routing-epe-18: (with COMMENT)
Martin Vigoureux via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Thu, 16 May 2019 08:22 UTC
Return-Path: <noreply@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: idr@ietf.org
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF67D120059; Thu, 16 May 2019 01:22:12 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Martin Vigoureux via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-idr-bgpls-segment-routing-epe@ietf.org, Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com>, aretana.ietf@gmail.com, idr-chairs@ietf.org, shares@ndzh.com, idr@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.96.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: Martin Vigoureux <martin.vigoureux@nokia.com>
Message-ID: <155799493277.19716.15836404472193017936.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Thu, 16 May 2019 01:22:12 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/4sNg4uAxoHAi_SDo_qPWoctNFBw>
Subject: [Idr] Martin Vigoureux's No Objection on draft-ietf-idr-bgpls-segment-routing-epe-18: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 May 2019 08:22:13 -0000
Martin Vigoureux has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-idr-bgpls-segment-routing-epe-18: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-idr-bgpls-segment-routing-epe/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Hi, thanks for this document. I only have a minor comment: Throughout the document, PeerNode SID, PeerAdj SID and PeerSet SID are used but the IANA section and existing registry use Peer-Node-SID, Peer-Adj-SID, Peer-Set-SID. Although there can't be any confusion, it might be worth having a single naming.
- [Idr] Martin Vigoureux's No Objection on draft-ie… Martin Vigoureux via Datatracker
- Re: [Idr] Martin Vigoureux's No Objection on draf… Ketan Talaulikar (ketant)