[Idr] Solicit feedbacks on draft-dong-idr-end-of-rib-use-extension

Jie Dong <jie.dong@huawei.com> Tue, 09 August 2011 07:46 UTC

Return-Path: <jie.dong@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69E4D21F8AF6 for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 9 Aug 2011 00:46:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id oKp3kcScWL7Y for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 9 Aug 2011 00:46:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from szxga01-in.huawei.com (szxga01-in.huawei.com [119.145.14.64]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8830E21F8A80 for <idr@ietf.org>; Tue, 9 Aug 2011 00:46:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from huawei.com (szxga05-in [172.24.2.49]) by szxga05-in.huawei.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 2.14 (built Aug 8 2006)) with ESMTP id <0LPN00E8MHMBWR@szxga05-in.huawei.com> for idr@ietf.org; Tue, 09 Aug 2011 15:46:59 +0800 (CST)
Received: from szxrg02-dlp.huawei.com ([172.24.2.119]) by szxga05-in.huawei.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 2.14 (built Aug 8 2006)) with ESMTP id <0LPN009HUHKP8Z@szxga05-in.huawei.com> for idr@ietf.org; Tue, 09 Aug 2011 15:46:59 +0800 (CST)
Received: from 172.24.2.119 (EHLO szxeml202-edg.china.huawei.com) ([172.24.2.119]) by szxrg02-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.1.9-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id ADA50925; Tue, 09 Aug 2011 15:46:58 +0800 (CST)
Received: from SZXEML404-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.82.67.59) by szxeml202-edg.china.huawei.com (172.24.2.42) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.270.1; Tue, 09 Aug 2011 15:46:54 +0800
Received: from SZXEML509-MBS.china.huawei.com ([169.254.2.156]) by szxeml404-hub.china.huawei.com ([fe80::75b7:3db9:fedc:a56d%13]) with mapi id 14.01.0270.001; Tue, 09 Aug 2011 15:46:58 +0800
Date: Tue, 09 Aug 2011 07:46:57 +0000
From: Jie Dong <jie.dong@huawei.com>
X-Originating-IP: [10.110.98.148]
To: "idr@ietf.org" <idr@ietf.org>
Message-id: <76CD132C3ADEF848BD84D028D243C9270B76B48C@szxeml509-mbs.china.huawei.com>
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-language: zh-CN
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
Accept-Language: en-US, zh-CN
Thread-topic: Solicit feedbacks on draft-dong-idr-end-of-rib-use-extension
Thread-index: AcxWaIOGlX/cLil9Quelmj6EiTtLxw==
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Subject: [Idr] Solicit feedbacks on draft-dong-idr-end-of-rib-use-extension
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/idr>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Aug 2011 07:46:41 -0000

Dear all, 

Internet-Draft draft-dong-idr-end-of-rib-use-extension was submitted before Quebec IETF. The url is: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-dong-idr-end-of-rib-use-extension-00

Since BGP End-of-Rib (EoR) would be useful for general BGP convergence, this draft proposes to define a EoR capability to negotiate the use of EoR between BGP peers. This makes EoR an independent feature and could be used without supporting or enabling GR capability. As according to BGP GR (RFC4724), BGP peers can only negotiate the combination of EoR and GR capability.

We've received some offline comments, one of which suggested an alternative solution: respin GR specification and cover this scenario: negotiate only EoR, no GR. 

Thus we would have two alternatives here:
either we define a simple and dedicated capability for EoR, 
or we respin BGP GR with some further capability negotiation functionality to cover this case.

We would like to solicit feedbacks and opinions on this draft and also the alternatives.

Many thanks,
Jie