Re: [Idr] AD Review of draft-ietf-idr-rfc5575bis-17

Alvaro Retana <> Fri, 20 September 2019 20:32 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id B77C01200F8; Fri, 20 Sep 2019 13:32:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.996
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.996 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id I992xXOKPcqH; Fri, 20 Sep 2019 13:32:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::535]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A2B49120114; Fri, 20 Sep 2019 13:32:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by with SMTP id f20so7600350edv.8; Fri, 20 Sep 2019 13:32:18 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=20161025; h=from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=TmadaKUc7jxMAEO7sVvWXc/k2mCmp5UkdtnxMCWhY8I=; b=kCdjbjWJbXJ7jQDElW1+ReErJMfDj8I+syn01O+ikRzRmemAcvdZMBYkHTlvhVuyXh T36FWNK1DlpAWWn0UgVjQ9tA1rAM4u9/BTjTwAGqM7kq/s1+dPOW6a3fcUn082/pXOu1 TgEMctCus+qqSCg715DQa7+qD1UIkca5rocGsF9KewD16ewvvvcbGGMd3JPleGzdI/ng kbGeq2wAnv4PlX7EzP5nReg/J6Y2qkB5IwFPj23ilC0mD+0J7ttum5msPKqcOX0dnI0U DthyMd5zY11OepGmNT+0/SxOBvB2GA5EiW7/BICUpSkgRhKWbc6s95Hfff2juopzyWyf Jw4w==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=TmadaKUc7jxMAEO7sVvWXc/k2mCmp5UkdtnxMCWhY8I=; b=G9vozixmKx4MDULXri1U1FwO+20HOIDkleQoarL1YlZgM5KUXRJx98hs/6KY88ybOj MxlY7Bif/J3oqahEKcuIFGzakqAPrBpgbC/RHAI8dz3GlHjshqSBLGWvWK4CGvFXTYSV 7/mJxsxzK5cq5PHQ9XUDtdaRLGZNY+tzFoWlFYHDT5SaOtbJlgnIaHJy0GD6S1/xKjzE g6d7ZdQqjwoyWm/4ylnntScpS/enZCrigeX4ongXIhT9EKMV/GlDthq/hZStfdZmRstc ZTcMul/1+IpqVjaFB0H9TaO1/rMz/jcmt3CC5kzJdf+hAt6S8w3VulFRtSxEprLYH8iH +9uA==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWAXRl3zZVAEJWl4cUzKO/G6tHGl8at3T950lMzqQgVhj4mob2e BFHyIT9e5rsrv2XqlMKlmRmylEJtUY3NkuTYq23JS1ae
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqz69NX0DQcb0J1PbYR/oU10Pgsy99uGv6PLikfr4IqQDxMoTv46c5DbE67LKjGD6wF+EscGAB3xcIS6CHuQ5+I=
X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:c79a:: with SMTP id cw26mr20489992ejb.265.1569011537099; Fri, 20 Sep 2019 13:32:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 1058052472880 named unknown by with HTTPREST; Fri, 20 Sep 2019 13:32:15 -0700
From: Alvaro Retana <>
In-Reply-To: <>
References: <> <>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2019 13:32:15 -0700
Message-ID: <>
To: Christoph Loibl <>
Cc:, "idr@ietf. org" <>,
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000514291059301f752"
Archived-At: <>
Subject: Re: [Idr] AD Review of draft-ietf-idr-rfc5575bis-17
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2019 20:32:21 -0000

On September 16, 2019 at 4:09:45 AM, Christoph Loibl ( wrote:



Thank you very much for your review of the document! We already started
working on the issues that you raised. Some of them result small changes
required to the document. To make the changes more transparent and track
them along with the issues I uploaded the document to github and opened
issues accordingly (

Using GitHub is ok…but the discussions are not necessarily more transparent
as they are not copied to the list.  Please make sure you summarize the
discussions on the list — replying to the text of my review would be ideal.

[Aside: A new WG in the GEN Area is chartered to develop policies and best
practices for WGs using GitHub [1].  There are a couple of documents under
consideration already.   Please take a look.]