[Idr] Roman Danyliw's No Objection on draft-ietf-idr-eag-distribution-16: (with COMMENT)

Roman Danyliw via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Tue, 18 May 2021 13:10 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: idr@ietf.org
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4BAD3A10AC; Tue, 18 May 2021 06:10:39 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Roman Danyliw via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: "The IESG" <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-idr-eag-distribution@ietf.org, idr-chairs@ietf.org, idr@ietf.org, Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com>, aretana.ietf@gmail.com, shares@ndzh.com
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 7.29.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: Roman Danyliw <rdd@cert.org>
Message-ID: <162134343909.18873.6150461240123862844@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Tue, 18 May 2021 06:10:39 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/61pAxjzW5UoSg7IJoq8FEKcj5IE>
Subject: [Idr] Roman Danyliw's No Objection on draft-ietf-idr-eag-distribution-16: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 18 May 2021 13:10:40 -0000

Roman Danyliw has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-idr-eag-distribution-16: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-idr-eag-distribution/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Per Section 4 (Security Considerations),

It is assumed that the IGP instances originating this TLV
   will support all the required security (as described in [RFC7308]) in
   order to prevent any security issues when propagating the TLVs into
   BGP-LS.

The Security Considerations (Section 3) of RFC7308 reads "This extension adds
no new security considerations."  What guidance is this sentence providing?