[Idr] Roman Danyliw's No Objection on draft-ietf-idr-eag-distribution-16: (with COMMENT)
Roman Danyliw via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Tue, 18 May 2021 13:10 UTC
Return-Path: <noreply@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: idr@ietf.org
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4BAD3A10AC; Tue, 18 May 2021 06:10:39 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Roman Danyliw via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-idr-eag-distribution@ietf.org, idr-chairs@ietf.org, idr@ietf.org, Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com>, aretana.ietf@gmail.com, shares@ndzh.com
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 7.29.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: Roman Danyliw <rdd@cert.org>
Message-ID: <162134343909.18873.6150461240123862844@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Tue, 18 May 2021 06:10:39 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/61pAxjzW5UoSg7IJoq8FEKcj5IE>
Subject: [Idr] Roman Danyliw's No Objection on draft-ietf-idr-eag-distribution-16: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 18 May 2021 13:10:40 -0000
Roman Danyliw has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-idr-eag-distribution-16: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-idr-eag-distribution/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Per Section 4 (Security Considerations), It is assumed that the IGP instances originating this TLV will support all the required security (as described in [RFC7308]) in order to prevent any security issues when propagating the TLVs into BGP-LS. The Security Considerations (Section 3) of RFC7308 reads "This extension adds no new security considerations." What guidance is this sentence providing?
- [Idr] Roman Danyliw's No Objection on draft-ietf-… Roman Danyliw via Datatracker
- Re: [Idr] Roman Danyliw's No Objection on draft-i… Jeff Tantsura
- Re: [Idr] Roman Danyliw's No Objection on draft-i… Benjamin Kaduk
- Re: [Idr] Roman Danyliw's No Objection on draft-i… Roman Danyliw
- Re: [Idr] Roman Danyliw's No Objection on draft-i… Jeff Tantsura