[Idr] Re: draft-chen-idr-bgp-ls-sr-policy-nrp-08 - updates needed prior to WG adoption call - Still need version -09
chen.ran@zte.com.cn Mon, 22 July 2024 22:08 UTC
Return-Path: <chen.ran@zte.com.cn>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6800BC169414 for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 22 Jul 2024 15:08:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.903
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.903 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id S9EEhcx917CX for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 22 Jul 2024 15:08:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mxhk.zte.com.cn (mxhk.zte.com.cn [63.216.63.35]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0F84DC151082 for <idr@ietf.org>; Mon, 22 Jul 2024 15:08:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mse-fl1.zte.com.cn (unknown [10.5.228.132]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mxhk.zte.com.cn (FangMail) with ESMTPS id 4WSZCx4lNjz5B1KR; Tue, 23 Jul 2024 06:08:13 +0800 (CST)
Received: from njb2app07.zte.com.cn ([10.55.22.95]) by mse-fl1.zte.com.cn with SMTP id 46MM88SL044405; Tue, 23 Jul 2024 06:08:08 +0800 (+08) (envelope-from chen.ran@zte.com.cn)
Received: from mapi (njb2app06[null]) by mapi (Zmail) with MAPI id mid203; Tue, 23 Jul 2024 06:08:08 +0800 (CST)
Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2024 06:08:08 +0800
X-Zmail-TransId: 2afe669ed848ffffffffd94-c676a
X-Mailer: Zmail v1.0
Message-ID: <20240723060808802KYL0OdfRRxNemsxINQNBX@zte.com.cn>
In-Reply-To: <CO1PR08MB6611E6E1A6A8A0C9FF71E597B3A82@CO1PR08MB6611.namprd08.prod.outlook.com>
References: CO1PR08MB6611F7B6FC73F3B92E109C79B3A62@CO1PR08MB6611.namprd08.prod.outlook.com,20240722100444760w6rcBdTWvCjHZeKX5_Hbs@zte.com.cn,CO1PR08MB6611E6E1A6A8A0C9FF71E597B3A82@CO1PR08MB6611.namprd08.prod.outlook.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
From: chen.ran@zte.com.cn
To: shares@ndzh.com
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="=====_001_next====="
X-MAIL: mse-fl1.zte.com.cn 46MM88SL044405
X-Fangmail-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-Fangmail-MID-QID: 669ED84D.001/4WSZCx4lNjz5B1KR
Message-ID-Hash: AFFLWWCWOYIYW6POLF7LYP6A4LFH3RB6
X-Message-ID-Hash: AFFLWWCWOYIYW6POLF7LYP6A4LFH3RB6
X-MailFrom: chen.ran@zte.com.cn
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-idr.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc4
Precedence: list
Subject: [Idr] Re: draft-chen-idr-bgp-ls-sr-policy-nrp-08 - updates needed prior to WG adoption call - Still need version -09
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/6AXIR7KPmcq6fwDlSdpUR-td1fU>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:idr-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:idr-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:idr-leave@ietf.org>
Hi Sue, Thanks! Best Regards, Ran Original From: SusanHares <shares@ndzh.com> To: 陈然00080434; Cc: idr@ietf.org <idr@ietf.org>; Date: 2024年07月23日 05:52 Subject: RE: [Idr] Re: draft-chen-idr-bgp-ls-sr-policy-nrp-08 - updates needed prior to WG adoption call - Still need version -09 Ran: Thank you for the submission. I will start the WG adoption call by 8pm PT today. Sue From: chen.ran@zte.com.cn <chen.ran@zte.com.cn> Sent: Sunday, July 21, 2024 10:05 PM To: Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com> Cc: idr@ietf.org Subject: Re: [Idr] Re: draft-chen-idr-bgp-ls-sr-policy-nrp-08 - updates needed prior to WG adoption call - Still need version -09 Hi Sue and WG, We just submitted version 09 and resolved all comments. The link is: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-chen-idr-bgp-ls-sr-policy-nrp/. Thanks. Best Regards, Ran Original From: SusanHares <shares@ndzh.com> To: idr@ietf.org <idr@ietf.org>; Date: 2024年07月12日 17:58 Subject: [Idr] Re: draft-chen-idr-bgp-ls-sr-policy-nrp-08 - updates needed prior to WG adoption call - Still need version -09 _______________________________________________ Idr mailing list -- idr@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to idr-leave@ietf.org Chen: Thank you for the updates in draft-chen-idr-bgp-ls-sr-policy-nrp-08 and your email: https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/LI_J2mPQhnaF1VS_TSGXA3V2qDo/ I’ve responded to your comments below. You also responded to Adrian also reviewed the document at: https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/SoQMt47xFHvJzO3CnJkfVaXolu4/ https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/qWLt2z9KI-9sPfdrCm-UKp0m7sU/ If you submit -09 by Monday of IETF week, I’ll start a WG adoption call for this draft. Cheerily, Sue ================ Short form of what needs to be changed: As a reminder, these are the things: Please provide the updates The following things do not seem to be resolved in draft-chen-idr-bgp-ls-sr-policy-nrp-08.txt: : What is the relationship between the information in this draft and the information in draft-ietf-spring-resource-aware-segments? Ran-1: Due to the resource SID mechanism defined in the draft-ietf-spring-resource-aware-segments, the headend node does not have information about the relationship between CP and NRP IDs, so it currently does not consider reporting the relationship between CP and NRP ID. The current draft is only for the scenario where data packets carry NRP ID. The NRP ID is used with the normal SR SID as the resource used will be indicated by the NRP-ID. An SR Policy candidate path (CP) may be instantiated with a specific NRP on the headend node via a local configuration, PCEP, or BGP SR Policy signaling. Then the state and attributes of the NRP associated with the candidate path of SR policy can be distributed to the controller. Sue-2 (response): Thank you for this feedback. Here’s a few suggestion for -09. Please indicate where the IPv6 packet carries the NRP-ID in next hop header. Expanding he following paragraph in section 1 might be helpful: [I-D.ietf-teas-nrp-scalability] introduces a scalable data plane approach to support Network Slice is to carry a dedicated NRP ID in the data packet to identify the NRP the packet belongs to, so that the packet can be processed and forwarded using the subset of network resources allocated to the NRP. Also refer to draft that specifies this. On CP, please expand CP the first time it is used in section 2, paragraph 3. Old text:/ This TLV is optional and only one this TLV is advertised for a given CP. / New text:/ This TLV is optional and only one this TLV is advertised for a given Candidate Path (CP). / 2. Discussion of how what state the NRP-ID specifically links to and helps align. Ran-1: A Network Resource Partition (NRP) is a collection of allocated network resources in a network. The SR policy the forwarding path of the data packet, and the NRP ID indicates the reserved resources along the path specified by the SR policy. By associating the SR policy with a specific NRP, the forwarding path and resource reservation along the path are ensured. BGP-LS reports the association between CP and NRP-ID, which is used to synchronize the association information between CP and NRP-ID. Sue-2: Review your text in sections 1 and 2. Can you include this wonderful explanation in either section. R Discussion of whether this draft applies to SR-MPLS Ran: Yes, this draft applies to SR-MPLS and will be clarified in the draft. Sue-2: Thanks for including this in section -09 Cheerily, Sue Hares
- [Idr] Re: draft-chen-idr-bgp-ls-sr-policy-nrp-08 … Susan Hares
- [Idr] Re: draft-chen-idr-bgp-ls-sr-policy-nrp-08 … chen.ran
- [Idr] Re: draft-chen-idr-bgp-ls-sr-policy-nrp-08 … chen.ran
- [Idr] Re: draft-chen-idr-bgp-ls-sr-policy-nrp-08 … Susan Hares
- [Idr] Re: draft-chen-idr-bgp-ls-sr-policy-nrp-08 … chen.ran