[Idr] [IANA #818092] RE: REVISED Last Call: <draft-ietf-idr-ls-distribution-10.txt> (North-Bound Distribution of Link-State and TE Information using BGP) to Proposed Standard

"Amanda Baber via RT" <drafts-lastcall@iana.org> Sat, 11 April 2015 07:26 UTC

Return-Path: <iana-shared@icann.org>
X-Original-To: expand-draft-ietf-idr-ls-distribution.all@virtual.ietf.org
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix, from userid 65534) id 7CD061AC42D; Sat, 11 Apr 2015 00:26:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: xfilter-draft-ietf-idr-ls-distribution.all@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: xfilter-draft-ietf-idr-ls-distribution.all@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com []) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60A0E1AC429 for <xfilter-draft-ietf-idr-ls-distribution.all@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 11 Apr 2015 00:26:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.879
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.879 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, MISSING_HEADERS=1.021] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cK285k7dTb1A for <xfilter-draft-ietf-idr-ls-distribution.all@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 11 Apr 2015 00:26:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from zinfandel.tools.ietf.org (zinfandel.tools.ietf.org [IPv6:2001:1890:123a::1:2a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9D69C1AC428 for <draft-ietf-idr-ls-distribution.all@ietf.org>; Sat, 11 Apr 2015 00:26:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp01.icann.org ([]:34226 helo=smtp1.lax.icann.org) by zinfandel.tools.ietf.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82_1-5b7a7c0-XX) (envelope-from <iana-shared@icann.org>) id 1YgpoG-0001Vy-ID for draft-ietf-idr-ls-distribution.all@tools.ietf.org; Sat, 11 Apr 2015 00:26:32 -0700
Received: from request3.lax.icann.org (request1.lax.icann.org []) by smtp1.lax.icann.org (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id t3B7QNWZ031090; Sat, 11 Apr 2015 07:26:23 GMT
Received: by request3.lax.icann.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 03FC9C207C5; Sat, 11 Apr 2015 07:26:23 +0000 (UTC)
RT-Owner: Nobody
From: Amanda Baber via RT <drafts-lastcall@iana.org>
In-Reply-To: <03d901d072f6$bc560660$35021320$@ndzh.com>
References: <RT-Ticket-818092@icann.org> <RT-Ticket-814076@icann.org> <20150318194048.32558.24468.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <rt-4.2.9-24060-1428448470-215.814076-7-0@icann.org> <03d901d072f6$bc560660$35021320$@ndzh.com>
Message-ID: <rt-4.2.9-26452-1428737182-1011.818092-7-0@icann.org>
X-RT-Loop-Prevention: IANA
X-RT-Ticket: IANA #818092
X-Managed-BY: RT 4.2.9 (http://www.bestpractical.com/rt/)
X-RT-Originator: amanda.baber@icann.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
X-RT-Original-Encoding: utf-8
Precedence: bulk
Date: Sat, 11 Apr 2015 07:26:22 +0000
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: draft-ietf-idr-ls-distribution.all@tools.ietf.org
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: iana-shared@icann.org
X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Mon, 26 Dec 2011 16:24:06 +0000)
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on zinfandel.tools.ietf.org)
Resent-To: draft-ietf-idr-ls-distribution.all@ietf.org
Resent-Message-Id: <20150411072633.9D69C1AC428@ietfa.amsl.com>
Resent-Date: Sat, 11 Apr 2015 00:26:33 -0700
Resent-From: iana-shared@icann.org
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/draft-ietf-idr-ls-distribution.all@tools/5DsPUvoNv44wlAo62ZFNuC8Vybo>
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/6LCbMt6dGkUhZSNymvbyMQzD4R0>
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sat, 11 Apr 2015 09:57:44 -0700
Cc: draft-ietf-idr-ls-distribution.all@tools.ietf.org
Subject: [Idr] [IANA #818092] RE: REVISED Last Call: <draft-ietf-idr-ls-distribution-10.txt> (North-Bound Distribution of Link-State and TE Information using BGP) to Proposed Standard
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Reply-To: drafts-lastcall@iana.org
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 11 Apr 2015 07:26:34 -0000

Sue, Jie,

Is the shepherd included in the "draft-ietf-idr-ls-distribution.all@tools.ietf.org" alias?

Before I send a note asking the authors to confirm the third and sixth actions, a quick note about this one: 

> On actions 1 and 2: First comment, this did go through the early
> allocation procedure, and then into the extension to permanent
> approval.   However, I have no objection to changing the language to
> fit the best text for IANA for the AFI/SAFI below.
The RFC 7120 use of the term "early allocation" refers only to temporary assignments made in ranges that don't allow for permanent assignment before approval. It's the RFC 7120 use that we're trying to reserve the term for. Because the authors requested assignment in the registries' First Come, First Served ranges rather than Standards Action ranges, the early allocation process turned out to be unnecessary in those two cases.