Re: [Idr] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC4360 (4944)

"Alvaro Retana (aretana)" <aretana@cisco.com> Thu, 23 February 2017 22:11 UTC

Return-Path: <aretana@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3AAA81299E3 for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 23 Feb 2017 14:11:31 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.522
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.522 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id KmOkmPA7aTJT for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 23 Feb 2017 14:11:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rcdn-iport-7.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-7.cisco.com [173.37.86.78]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D976A1296E5 for <idr@ietf.org>; Thu, 23 Feb 2017 14:11:29 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1118; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1487887889; x=1489097489; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-id:content-transfer-encoding: mime-version; bh=XtgxUU0E7As1cRSiErRzrUJuAxEKzediZmDi/xxPQi0=; b=Dic4t7LpxI2CWuipdQ3+oD4sLvoT3D/tEWmuWPz9fJSzVlMEDYwj69JG gaCJaX8LDWq8s9dfRFrTz5RtZqd8vX74lBNz88nW8hos5tAkKDiQDnEJ+ 9y/nTnaLIqCckQ+/XQPkx2stNzbZH0tBlg6xXf6R/B/23Ri0R0vlkSTxZ w=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A0CXAgCUXa9Y/5xdJa1dGQEBAQEBAQEBA?= =?us-ascii?q?QEBBwEBAQEBg1CBageDVIoIpxCCDYYiAhqDCz8YAQIBAQEBAQEBYihCEIQfBiM?= =?us-ascii?q?RRRACAQgaAiYCAgIwFRACBAENBYl1riyCJotDAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBA?= =?us-ascii?q?QEBHYELhUGCBYJqgTyDGIMGLoIxAQSJI4d0hFKGKwGSI4F7jxaIN4pwAR84gQB?= =?us-ascii?q?UFU8BhEaBcXWEfYU8gQ0BAQE?=
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.35,198,1484006400"; d="scan'208";a="210510520"
Received: from rcdn-core-5.cisco.com ([173.37.93.156]) by rcdn-iport-7.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 23 Feb 2017 22:11:28 +0000
Received: from XCH-ALN-003.cisco.com (xch-aln-003.cisco.com [173.36.7.13]) by rcdn-core-5.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id v1NMBRuk014356 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Thu, 23 Feb 2017 22:11:28 GMT
Received: from xch-aln-002.cisco.com (173.36.7.12) by XCH-ALN-003.cisco.com (173.36.7.13) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1210.3; Thu, 23 Feb 2017 16:11:27 -0600
Received: from xch-aln-002.cisco.com ([173.36.7.12]) by XCH-ALN-002.cisco.com ([173.36.7.12]) with mapi id 15.00.1210.000; Thu, 23 Feb 2017 16:11:26 -0600
From: "Alvaro Retana (aretana)" <aretana@cisco.com>
To: "John G. Scudder" <jgs@juniper.net>, RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Thread-Topic: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC4360 (4944)
Thread-Index: AQHSjA3G7e9MIEgYR0mGdXEn8tWFbqF3ihUA//+yHwA=
Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2017 22:11:26 +0000
Message-ID: <CA35E303-A40D-40AE-A6BC-2385F9447637@cisco.com>
References: <20170221064307.662DDB818AE@rfc-editor.org> <176CF6D8-2000-434D-B594-67D97FAF6B66@juniper.net>
In-Reply-To: <176CF6D8-2000-434D-B594-67D97FAF6B66@juniper.net>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/f.1f.0.170216
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.117.15.6]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <A8D4DD2F58C0F542B0F8FF0F92237AB8@emea.cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/6ZmaQwI3IVbGuqKQgLxudS2nI1s>
Cc: idr wg <idr@ietf.org>, "yang@nohdmi.com" <yang@nohdmi.com>, Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com>
Subject: Re: [Idr] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC4360 (4944)
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2017 22:11:31 -0000

I Rejected it already. ☺

Thanks!

Alvaro.





On 2/23/17, 4:50 PM, "John G. Scudder" <jgs@juniper.net> wrote:

    The erratum either is for a typographical error, in which case it should be Hold for Document Update, or it's in error, in which case it should 
be Rejected. The guidelines don't offer a "this is a matter of taste" option, which I think is what applies here, unless someone can cite an RFC Editor style guideline specifying that the rulers are supposed to have the numbers above the pluses?
    
    Right now my inclination would be go with Reject, but if someone can cite evidence that the proposed fix is objectively more correct than the current text (or if the mood of the WG supports that option, for that matter) we could do Hold for Document Update instead.