IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Idr] RS BFD draft

Nick Hilliard <nick@foobar.org> Wed, 19 April 2017 09:12 UTC

Return-Path: <nick@foobar.org>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9AA51315AF for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 19 Apr 2017 02:12:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.201
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.201 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id RRnxJ2qIvmNH for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 19 Apr 2017 02:12:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.netability.ie (mail.netability.ie [IPv6:2a03:8900:0:100::5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A0FFE1292AE for <idr@ietf.org>; Wed, 19 Apr 2017 02:12:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Envelope-To: idr@ietf.org
Received: from cupcake.local ([194.88.241.232]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail.netability.ie (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id v3J9CeeD046633 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 19 Apr 2017 10:12:41 +0100 (IST) (envelope-from nick@foobar.org)
X-Authentication-Warning: cheesecake.ibn.ie: Host [194.88.241.232] claimed to be cupcake.local
Message-ID: <58F729FF.7000700@foobar.org>
Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2017 12:12:31 +0300
From: Nick Hilliard <nick@foobar.org>
User-Agent: Postbox 5.0.12 (Macintosh/20170323)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Jeffrey Haas <jhaas@pfrc.org>
CC: idr wg <idr@ietf.org>
References: <CA+b+ERnHAdrQa1f-b7st3QBjzbFS1zvktkGCAppRuqGkf8Vnhg@mail.gmail.com> <CA+b+ER=E1FV4=-W9jcHG4ih0GeE2O1jDXKNAZhEe+nENEHAiYg@mail.gmail.com> <CA+b+ERkfV4C++arFCBXnyjgkA-FtcqMmd8_9UcbKLWxR32h1EQ@mail.gmail.com> <CA+b+ERkvu296sqD_bi41++RqHiV-f+4cUpb1BPrhE6HsxeueqA@mail.gmail.com> <CA+b+ERk+XP5DvuZStYW=e1uGRWDWE-PiPdwhtkHiVK7hFui7_g@mail.gmail.com> <CA+b+ERmapG68ysZ4=6uDAH=Z+fRaprzgsyQASP4aYD=OTea_Qg@mail.gmail.com> <CA+b+ERkZ-WY5FWiDu_k=1+7tUHEApYj+mMLqZiFzTWGuvHLjGA@mail.gmail.com> <CA+b+ER=MBiFno8CDv9JgpFFmJz4cuDe_tQhm+AHx5njxJy6p6Q@mail.gmail.com> <CA+b+ER=3qy_096Q61FBQgkRSt8j0P1NTQ+EFVit0XEnWvLp6mg@mail.gmail.com> <CA+b+ERmuGSZBcboZDsRo1NDb3dsRozmcEW77KWLyzyjxK8ezww@mail.gmail.com> <20170418203823.GC9688@pfrc.org>
In-Reply-To: <20170418203823.GC9688@pfrc.org>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.2.3
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/6kUenDu4YuT9D8viuhiLQ-ik-Nw>
Subject: Re: [Idr] RS BFD draft
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2017 09:12:47 -0000

Jeffrey Haas wrote:
> The RS-BFD proposal doesn't preclude other mechanisms for advertising
> alternate paths.  I'd be interested in hearing about RS operators that have
> any intentions of deploying BGP add-paths[1] or diverse paths.

with RS operator hat on, add-paths is interesting; diverse paths less
so.  I'd deploy add-paths on the RS side if there were more client
support out there for it.  Right now, this is thin on the ground.

Nick

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email