Re: [Idr] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC4271 (6707)

Chris Smiley <csmiley@amsl.com> Wed, 13 October 2021 19:56 UTC

Return-Path: <csmiley@amsl.com>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 342C83A0D1E for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 13 Oct 2021 12:56:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NSwJKwZ6cPjr for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 13 Oct 2021 12:56:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from c8a.amsl.com (c8a.amsl.com [4.31.198.40]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B780E3A0CB9 for <idr@ietf.org>; Wed, 13 Oct 2021 12:56:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by c8a.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FD5042C6417; Wed, 13 Oct 2021 12:56:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
Received: from c8a.amsl.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (c8a.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LgGMXYmB89Y7; Wed, 13 Oct 2021 12:56:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.16] (cpe-76-95-228-63.socal.res.rr.com [76.95.228.63]) by c8a.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6513742C6415; Wed, 13 Oct 2021 12:56:08 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.11\))
From: Chris Smiley <csmiley@amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <20211013150428.4A178D8505@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2021 12:56:07 -0700
Cc: yakov@juniper.net, tony.li@tony.li, skh@nexthop.com, idr@ietf.org, RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <41A8AB06-2156-4279-B11A-035BF3C4200B@amsl.com>
References: <20211013150428.4A178D8505@rfc-editor.org>
To: Alvaro Retana <aretana.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.11)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/6tT5Rjx3WJ0u_rWbwtyfgEQBizs>
Subject: Re: [Idr] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC4271 (6707)
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2021 19:56:14 -0000

Greetings,

We note that this erratum reports the same issue as was reported in errata report 3459 (https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid3459).

As such, we have deleted this report.

Please let us know any concerns.

Thank you.

RFC Editor/cs


> On Oct 13, 2021, at 8:04 AM, RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> wrote:
> 
> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC4271,
> "A Border Gateway Protocol 4 (BGP-4)".
> 
> --------------------------------------
> You may review the report below and at:
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid6707
> 
> --------------------------------------
> Type: Editorial
> Reported by: Alvaro Retana <aretana.ietf@gmail.com>
> 
> Section: 6.8
> 
> Original Text
> -------------
>   If a pair of BGP speakers try to establish a BGP connection with each
>   other simultaneously, then two parallel connections well be formed.
> 
> 
> Corrected Text
> --------------
>   If a pair of BGP speakers try to establish a BGP connection with each
>   other simultaneously, then two parallel connections will be formed.
> 
> 
> Notes
> -----
> s/well be formed/will be formed
> 
> Instructions:
> -------------
> This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
> use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
> rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party  
> can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. 
> 
> --------------------------------------
> RFC4271 (draft-ietf-idr-bgp4-26)
> --------------------------------------
> Title               : A Border Gateway Protocol 4 (BGP-4)
> Publication Date    : January 2006
> Author(s)           : Y. Rekhter, Ed., T. Li, Ed., S. Hares, Ed.
> Category            : DRAFT STANDARD
> Source              : Inter-Domain Routing
> Area                : Routing
> Stream              : IETF
> Verifying Party     : IESG
>