Re: [Idr] [BULK] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-idr-rfc5575bis-20

Christoph Loibl <c@tix.at> Fri, 17 April 2020 07:45 UTC

Return-Path: <c@tix.at>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 005F43A0FB8; Fri, 17 Apr 2020 00:45:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=tix.at
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Fz11rBjUN89L; Fri, 17 Apr 2020 00:45:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.fbsd.host (mail.fbsd.host [IPv6:2001:858:58::22]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 018EB3A103B; Fri, 17 Apr 2020 00:44:25 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=tix.at; s=rev1; h=References:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:Date:Subject:Mime-Version:Content-Type :Message-Id:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe: List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=3AksEctf0aAkRec7xX1ZqOXb0an0sQxFB0KOHRewg5s=; b=hX8HweVbSPvS0tiEZdfqmIw72c pzMeyc3/mT+XOyHz1SkC0lsyKs3znRN8IRKJcxNkX5HZ9aTjhGAa2RHbkZ5bMy6tjF6Lbi1gsuI3+ dZujCAG3Sar1iTwHZCYBlCIviRs5hTQxyAbZQ4i3fJBC/hs3DHTUKo5+PYH0ZnaQkn7h72CW8Qetv oP51BHLEwev0Ipuz9AE4qE0L4sFYipNIaSGHnwL0Y4XuBTlfbqXG5JtZmx4pIkqlqnVmWvkSMkAHD /ncaFDnsjTo98oMOOZH1MtO1vRUsmjEPBQGUu93p89FuBCfxgk6WeZXhGe0/xmboxK2a79MXGiqe6 wJ5PfR4w==;
Received: from 213-225-13-127.nat.highway.a1.net ([213.225.13.127] helo=[192.168.88.217]) by mail.fbsd.host with esmtpsa (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92.3) (envelope-from <c@tix.at>) id 1jPLfj-0001T1-Kz; Fri, 17 Apr 2020 09:44:23 +0200
From: Christoph Loibl <c@tix.at>
Message-Id: <F67D691A-C577-42AD-9429-A48F965013B9@tix.at>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_73FCF4E2-E692-4080-9245-08C26E53BE6E"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.0 \(3608.60.0.2.5\))
Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2020 09:44:21 +0200
In-Reply-To: <158643250722.20996.2687173728603121972@ietfa.amsl.com>
Cc: secdir@ietf.org, last-call@ietf.org, idr@ietf.org, draft-ietf-idr-rfc5575bis.all@ietf.org
To: Yoav Nir <ynir.ietf@gmail.com>
References: <158643250722.20996.2687173728603121972@ietfa.amsl.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.60.0.2.5)
X-Scanned-By: primary on mail.fbsd.host (78.142.178.22); Fri, 17 Apr 2020 09:44:23 +0200
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/7G-2hEsW43CXcWJLAFkwC3Ag8Mw>
Subject: Re: [Idr] [BULK] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-idr-rfc5575bis-20
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2020 07:45:21 -0000

Hi Yoav,

Thank you for your review.

Cheers
Christoph
-- 
Christoph Loibl
c@tix.at | CL8-RIPE | PGP-Key-ID: 0x4B2C0055 | http://www.nextlayer.at



> On 09.04.2020, at 13:41, Yoav Nir via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> wrote:
> 
> Reviewer: Yoav Nir
> Review result: Ready
> 
> I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's ongoing
> effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG. These comments
> were written primarily for the benefit of the security area directors. 
> Document editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just like any other
> last call comments.
> 
> This one is ready, and the Security Considerations section is remarkably
> well-written.
> 
>