IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Idr] WGLC on draft-ietf-idr-as-private-reservation-00

Nick Hilliard <nick@foobar.org> Thu, 20 December 2012 21:52 UTC

Return-Path: <nick@foobar.org>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A50121F8994 for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 20 Dec 2012 13:52:35 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kR1fZENk7GVh for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 20 Dec 2012 13:52:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.acquirer.com (mail.netability.ie [IPv6:2a03:8900:0:100::5]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8235B21F8717 for <idr@ietf.org>; Thu, 20 Dec 2012 13:52:32 -0800 (PST)
X-Envelope-To: idr@ietf.org
Received: from cupcake.foobar.org (twinkie.foobar.org [87.192.56.84]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail.acquirer.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id qBKLogHP052338 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 20 Dec 2012 21:50:47 GMT (envelope-from nick@foobar.org)
Message-ID: <50D38896.5080900@foobar.org>
Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2012 21:52:22 +0000
From: Nick Hilliard <nick@foobar.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.8; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Thunderbird/17.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "Neil J. McRae" <neil@domino.org>
References: <20121211185917.GA21813@puck.nether.net> <CA+b+ERnzo2BLWjE1J_dMfYuExbG9WYJroPE4ZAWg++KK2_jy1g@mail.gmail.com> <CA+b+ERm=Agr7b6JXcXOwiP4wBjnEFmnVNt5fAJrn18R0hGtSzg@mail.gmail.com> <50C78C29.3070406@foobar.org> <50C8B8D9.4090903@umn.edu> <50C9039E.1050104@foobar.org> <20121213144147.GB4524@puck.nether.net> <50CB52E0.7080602@foobar.org> <20121214174012.GA18502@puck.nether.net> <50CE1D95.2000709@foobar.org> <20121217162903.GA15927@puck.nether.net>, <50D1DEBF.7040500@foobar.org> <3CD6D775-69F8-4508-85FF-F0B94169BE87@domino.org>
In-Reply-To: <3CD6D775-69F8-4508-85FF-F0B94169BE87@domino.org>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.6
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: IETF IDR Working Group <idr@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Idr] WGLC on draft-ietf-idr-as-private-reservation-00
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/idr>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2012 21:52:35 -0000

On 20/12/2012 21:38, Neil J. McRae wrote:
> I echo Randy's view that this needs grow to look at it.

No major objection to that.  Does that happen now, or once it's finished WGLC?

> transition technologies they work really well ! Because we never compromise them do we!?

all things considered, the asn16->asn32 migration is going remarkably well.
 I'd say the idea is mature enough so that if we need to do an asn32 ->
asn64 migration in 2.5 million years time (based on current asn usage
figures), it would probably proceed well enough that we don't need to worry
to much about it at this stage.  That's if we make it past the end of the
world tomorrow.

Nick

v2.31.3 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status