IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Idr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-idr-large-community-01.txt

Jay Borkenhagen <jayb@braeburn.org> Wed, 12 October 2016 22:46 UTC

Return-Path: <jayb@oz.mt.att.com>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D8F3129440 for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 12 Oct 2016 15:46:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id f_T6jdkswikm for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 12 Oct 2016 15:46:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx0a-00191d01.pphosted.com (mx0b-00191d01.pphosted.com [67.231.157.136]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 10E7C1293FE for <idr@ietf.org>; Wed, 12 Oct 2016 15:46:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pps.filterd (m0049462.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by m0049462.ppops.net-00191d01. (8.16.0.17/8.16.0.17) with SMTP id u9CMiwhm000835; Wed, 12 Oct 2016 18:46:15 -0400
Received: from alpi154.enaf.aldc.att.com (sbcsmtp6.sbc.com [144.160.229.23]) by m0049462.ppops.net-00191d01. with ESMTP id 261wyk8gb9-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 12 Oct 2016 18:46:14 -0400
Received: from enaf.aldc.att.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by alpi154.enaf.aldc.att.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id u9CMkEeJ001272; Wed, 12 Oct 2016 18:46:14 -0400
Received: from alpi132.aldc.att.com (alpi132.aldc.att.com [130.8.217.2]) by alpi154.enaf.aldc.att.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id u9CMkAk7001266 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 12 Oct 2016 18:46:10 -0400
Received: from alpi153.aldc.att.com (alpi153.aldc.att.com [130.8.42.31]) by alpi132.aldc.att.com (RSA Interceptor); Wed, 12 Oct 2016 22:45:50 GMT
Received: from aldc.att.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by alpi153.aldc.att.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id u9CMjniA029733; Wed, 12 Oct 2016 18:45:50 -0400
Received: from oz.mt.att.com (oz.mt.att.com [135.16.165.23]) by alpi153.aldc.att.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id u9CMjlLh029621; Wed, 12 Oct 2016 18:45:48 -0400
Received: by oz.mt.att.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id BDBECA40E91; Wed, 12 Oct 2016 18:45:46 -0400 (EDT)
X-Mailer: emacs 24.3.1 (via feedmail 11-beta-1 I); VM 8.2.0b under 24.3.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <22526.48408.762893.63854@oz.mt.att.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2016 18:45:44 -0400
From: Jay Borkenhagen <jayb@braeburn.org>
To: heasley <heas@shrubbery.net>
In-Reply-To: <20161012223454.GR45879@shrubbery.net>
References: <00ff01d22214$a9832440$4001a8c0@gateway.2wire.net> <57FAD3EA.6070800@foobar.org> <020b01d223a1$f0e34a20$4001a8c0@gateway.2wire.net> <57FCC876.5090109@foobar.org> <52AF3F60-BC0F-44AC-89D7-8E108617162F@pfrc.org> <552160CC-1000-42B1-95E3-6F6B9E1DC2F8@gmail.com> <20161011221544.GG12806@shrubbery.net> <20161012134552.GE22695@pfrc.org> <20161012215623.GH45879@shrubbery.net> <CA+b+ER=d3DAObhJws3k2Jvmu6XJcpv8jJAkmROqb_zCXi430aQ@mail.gmail.com> <20161012223454.GR45879@shrubbery.net>
X-GPG-Fingerprint: DDDB 542E D988 94D0 82D3 D198 7DED 6648 2308 D3C0
X-RSA-Inspected: yes
X-RSA-Classifications: public
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:, , definitions=2016-10-12_13:, , signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_policy_notspam policy=outbound_policy score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1034 lowpriorityscore=0 impostorscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1609300000 definitions=main-1610120379
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/7KRbMtZhimQ7lBN-S2jLQApquok>
Cc: idr <idr@ietf.org>, Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net>
Subject: Re: [Idr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-idr-large-community-01.txt
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Jay Borkenhagen <jayb@braeburn.org>
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2016 22:46:17 -0000

heasley writes:
 > Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 12:08:44AM +0200, Robert Raszuk:
 > > I believe Jeff was talking about intelligent cleanup with sufficient
 > > information embedded into community itself such that forwarding BGP speaker
 > > can decide what to pass and what to drop
 > > ... not an unconditional blind drop.
 > 
 > I (we, I believe) do not want vendors to do anything automatic about
 > dropping/altering communities.  But, provide us all the tools to manipulate
 > them.
 > 

I want the same thing that heas wants.  So yes: "we" is correct.

       	   	      	   		   Jay B.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email