IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Idr] WG Last Call on draft-ietf-idr-bgp-ls-registry-00.txt (original: 11/20 to 12/3/2019) Extension from 3/3 to 3/10

"Ketan Talaulikar (ketant)" <ketant@cisco.com> Wed, 04 March 2020 06:42 UTC

Return-Path: <ketant@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87CBC3A1004 for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 3 Mar 2020 22:42:48 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com header.b=JNKsfnfg; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com header.b=Xgoub7U6
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jCW5mXMWcheG for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 3 Mar 2020 22:42:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: from alln-iport-4.cisco.com (alln-iport-4.cisco.com [173.37.142.91]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B72903A1002 for <idr@ietf.org>; Tue, 3 Mar 2020 22:42:46 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=11302; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1583304166; x=1584513766; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:references:in-reply-to: mime-version; bh=SsHocg2ojcyYOiaqr6uDVvUQxGT16UEN60h1BgWNkTE=; b=JNKsfnfgnmObGbVKu7w5PTbDjw1EnIRcxPWgEkFSrJ6ubALEifPh5mAc zZ2yXGyijdDOVjV7dJFf+BrDC9AUGpzgwxGUvkj8vecb1k+8eHi87GqjE 76FVAD0tT3+LYQZbnSi+YjJvd97nmOvp3zr2OH5Rc5PO7oPkg6uGlrO1s w=;
IronPort-PHdr: 9a23:czDLlBwEWnu1wgbXCy+N+z0EezQntrPoPwUc9psgjfdUf7+++4j5YR2N/u1j2VnOW4iTq+lJjebbqejBYSQB+t7A1RJKa5lQT1kAgMQSkRYnBZuGBFHyKuLCZC0hF8MEX1hgrDm2
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0DzSQCRTV9e/5tdJa1lHAECOAEEBAEDAQcBgVaBIxsCEiQsBWxYIAQLKgqECoNGA4pnToIRkzOEYoJSA1QJAQEBDAEBLQIEAQGEQAIXgWUkOBMCAw0BAQUBAQECAQUEbYVWDIVjAQEBAQMSEQoTAQEpDw8CAQYCDgMEAQEkBwICAjAdCAEBBAESCBqDBYF9TQMtAQGRCJBnAoE5iGJ1gTKCfwEBBYUZGIFyGgmBNgIBAYwjGoFBP4ERR4JNPoEEg0mDDzKCLJBmhXCKC48/CoI8kAOGf4JJiB+ETYt8jnKbSwIEAgQFAg4BAQWBaSKBWHAVgydQGA2OVYM7ilV0gSmOLwGBDwEB
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.70,513,1574121600"; d="scan'208,217";a="441842801"
Received: from rcdn-core-4.cisco.com ([173.37.93.155]) by alln-iport-4.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA; 04 Mar 2020 06:42:45 +0000
Received: from XCH-RCD-005.cisco.com (xch-rcd-005.cisco.com [173.37.102.15]) by rcdn-core-4.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 0246gj4Q023509 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Wed, 4 Mar 2020 06:42:45 GMT
Received: from xhs-rtp-002.cisco.com (64.101.210.229) by XCH-RCD-005.cisco.com (173.37.102.15) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3; Wed, 4 Mar 2020 00:42:45 -0600
Received: from xhs-rtp-003.cisco.com (64.101.210.230) by xhs-rtp-002.cisco.com (64.101.210.229) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3; Wed, 4 Mar 2020 01:42:44 -0500
Received: from NAM11-CO1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (64.101.32.56) by xhs-rtp-003.cisco.com (64.101.210.230) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3 via Frontend Transport; Wed, 4 Mar 2020 01:42:44 -0500
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=jkSHIpDqmBNL9OxLxsgkw2hRm5EO+x/1RMuIoPqHev4mLUI+cyhuLnGXL0UPQIzAvAmOO7sPKE/252aL8w2NMQ8alKhU5zSa6Q+7AZ6m9dVc7gCQSxjdLpkGsGGYh5V02wWpctbcEypEaI0JXK8/JwUzhN+txpi+4M49UrHSsMVasqJXb+31steyIJcohXVc77GXtX+nBOcLrwCcaxVWIfiV1+8Wcaas0BIuMy+NBks1szNXnNVyloXkSk7Wr3uiNkgsHuf1fO0iHFXuHJ8If6aKJ5lS9OfOjyrYzOIugwMn9v6aVtP5gpYrxlzKz6YeTNlBlwIKUGcuDuEo+mLjeA==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck;bh=SsHocg2ojcyYOiaqr6uDVvUQxGT16UEN60h1BgWNkTE=; b=S/C4VBKxXWZiw4dKO+aUR6Dd3bLCyXqNsKWnXbEEE5ra0X06cpHA/iNHTeyDyXxu7+Qm0aNIhxnL0T6xYUpGdkMk9GMZqpzFM9ydIU6toNaVIftnX7LNv6DdEn/iil+4hrZ9AzuKpnH4goV+LD5iJ2o2gdOIc00S0Vq0dCrKUx5leuWqiH+aW0oRnQ3/9S5Ox9zjVrCxQeXIToPx3o3ArRIHsco7v+/AyCb4DKZV0QN7upQLBxDb+x2T8va84vgcOl4S+4i06vz8LKbEL7i/GwmzBRCe7OGGqT3tdhJsWTvrYxrKvy884d7C06BmSeIN8ON6tn5U4tM2FbuQxi2SJA==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=cisco.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=cisco.com; dkim=pass header.d=cisco.com; arc=none
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector2-cisco-onmicrosoft-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=SsHocg2ojcyYOiaqr6uDVvUQxGT16UEN60h1BgWNkTE=; b=Xgoub7U6PyKgagbewYzJZ9XGQZ4xC8rs7JtPwkG5Uj3nHWl38WVo62jq6fFIvzRWazhN1tAvtd/n0lWSx431Sy0Klg9XiXP6/8kW4v4EwQMZsnUH2q/BpLwwieJ2DZkeO2ga7xwQFw8tnPthyxaSErbyxGj4kVrI+w2WGAJsZrs=
Received: from MW3PR11MB4570.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:303:5f::22) by MW3PR11MB4601.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:303:59::11) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.2772.14; Wed, 4 Mar 2020 06:42:43 +0000
Received: from MW3PR11MB4570.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::95ae:a984:9998:f2c8]) by MW3PR11MB4570.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::95ae:a984:9998:f2c8%7]) with mapi id 15.20.2772.019; Wed, 4 Mar 2020 06:42:43 +0000
From: "Ketan Talaulikar (ketant)" <ketant@cisco.com>
To: Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com>, "'idr@ietf. org'" <idr@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Idr] WG Last Call on draft-ietf-idr-bgp-ls-registry-00.txt (original: 11/20 to 12/3/2019) Extension from 3/3 to 3/10
Thread-Index: AdXxy/ffQMsdWV5mTo6wFPQedkx8+wAI0alA
Date: Wed, 04 Mar 2020 06:42:43 +0000
Message-ID: <MW3PR11MB4570B041EE046DF469CAD5CCC1E50@MW3PR11MB4570.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
References: <00ca01d5f1cc$f73166d0$e5943470$@ndzh.com>
In-Reply-To: <00ca01d5f1cc$f73166d0$e5943470$@ndzh.com>
Accept-Language: en-GB, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=ketant@cisco.com;
x-originating-ip: [49.36.50.35]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: fddfebd8-286d-4021-4d72-08d7c0073e20
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: MW3PR11MB4601:
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <MW3PR11MB4601CAF333AEC28420A8A316C1E50@MW3PR11MB4601.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:10000;
x-forefront-prvs: 0332AACBC3
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10009020)(4636009)(376002)(366004)(396003)(39860400002)(136003)(346002)(199004)(189003)(71200400001)(2906002)(5660300002)(186003)(76116006)(52536014)(110136005)(7696005)(33656002)(66946007)(66556008)(64756008)(26005)(6506007)(53546011)(66476007)(8676002)(81156014)(66446008)(8936002)(478600001)(81166006)(316002)(86362001)(9686003)(9326002)(55016002); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101; SCL:1; SRVR:MW3PR11MB4601; H:MW3PR11MB4570.namprd11.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; LANG:en; PTR:InfoNoRecords; A:1; MX:1;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: cisco.com does not designate permitted sender hosts)
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0;
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: zRtjkQA+VEezJiGhSv9CQpuZtMgsbHGKD8W0TY4RbJqBdEeIvQ4A4M6C5UxcLvmFQdUHcom5nFYkuqYfYMWT5WZE0rE0rGMdhagN/tbw98qb3bZMU9AU2hn0+kpVgzgFk+zyznfV9utl1f/TEnElHzX71KWxPUT5PwBblwbQ7Z2wugcTa+dxxv3IWdLNpwkbVRSHWc/Ibu6wPbZN0QtiDiBatuOJjUOzMBws5RtBtjxfISFvrDw1e1xE3KTbAZwFL657GGkEhiiOI3iPmkTGuOy0pDReIQU5hheI55RgRUyvwz+930KmaC9lNXchwcwnAgmDOg/HKrExb0P4jx2VcuolVTIi6yVxKD/MMt0q/BV+AzVHWMlLOKrPBkuxYyMBuWvUQW7q01VGi7QFQdi+dolxQYpG3BlrRUp7DPL9KazbxSBVRwoA4BxpQ/qmkf2z
x-ms-exchange-antispam-messagedata: RaEbM8TChnzNz6KSOJpHsOyTyEvjowOHVdtL0500I2InFcv75ocVVAkkml/kudaKik7kp5CVFX9OQFlIHE2PLubw0I3qcfWeaUmxLoiKDh6yFTHOv44cI59a/b3sRyDPuE+wZr9V3an2Vk+tdZXwHA==
x-ms-exchange-transport-forked: True
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_MW3PR11MB4570B041EE046DF469CAD5CCC1E50MW3PR11MB4570namp_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: fddfebd8-286d-4021-4d72-08d7c0073e20
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 04 Mar 2020 06:42:43.2905 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 5ae1af62-9505-4097-a69a-c1553ef7840e
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: NVHV488Hle1bjW9J5179Ik7esPcK3PkpVKa2vNjXM8/QLjg7JGZDHuSi7ya0lHYi9xWGWjH33ckO5a2wPryMZQ==
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: MW3PR11MB4601
X-OriginatorOrg: cisco.com
X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 173.37.102.15, xch-rcd-005.cisco.com
X-Outbound-Node: rcdn-core-4.cisco.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/7SN7jf-dTHvBJ6fHHtySXiwdq54>
Subject: Re: [Idr] WG Last Call on draft-ietf-idr-bgp-ls-registry-00.txt (original: 11/20 to 12/3/2019) Extension from 3/3 to 3/10
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 Mar 2020 06:42:49 -0000

Hi Sue,

Once again, I would like to support the WGLC for this document.

I will also note that this draft is not about any BGP-LS protocol operations or encodings. It only proposes to make the process lightweight for those of us in the WG that are writing/implementing BGP-LS drafts or the IDR chairs and DEs evaluating all the incoming codepoint requests. So normally I would not accept rave responses from other than those same set of people? 😊

Thanks,
Ketan

From: Idr <idr-bounces@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Susan Hares
Sent: 04 March 2020 08:01
To: 'idr@ietf. org' <idr@ietf.org>
Subject: [Idr] WG Last Call on draft-ietf-idr-bgp-ls-registry-00.txt (original: 11/20 to 12/3/2019) Extension from 3/3 to 3/10

Greetings:

This is a 1 week extension on draft-ietf-idr-bgp-ls-registry-00.txt.

This draft attempts to speed up the allocation for BGP-LS parameters in
IANA’s “Border Gateway Protocol – Link State (BGP-LS)
Parameters Registry”.

   This document updates RFC 7752 by changing the allocation policy for
   all of the registries to "Expert Review" and by updating the guidance
   to the Designated Experts.

John and I really want to speed up any of the registries assignments of BGP-LS we can.
We think the mechanism that Adrian Farrel proposes provides a good idea.
We hope you will read this draft and consider if you agree with us.

During the 11/20 to 12/3/2019 WG LC, we had rave reviews from people working
the BGP-LS – but not enough people comments.

Please consider comment on this draft – with comments or support.
This is a one week extension.   Comment early and often.

Sue

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email