[Idr] Re: Shepherd Report for draft-ietf-idr-bgp-ls-te-path-02.txt

[Ketan Talaulikar <[e-mail]>]

< as a WG member >

Hi Sue,

I have suspended my work on this WG draft as I did not see any
implementation interest being shown within the WG. Without implementations,
this draft will anyway get "held up" and I felt that my time is better
spent on other things.

Should there be implementation interest anytime in the future, this work
can be continued based on feedback from implementers and operators.

Thanks,
Ketan


On Sat, Feb 22, 2025 at 3:04 AM Susan Hares <[e-mail]> wrote:

> This review of draft-ietf-idr-bgp-ls-te-path-02.
>
>
>
> Why is this review being sent: Prior to each IETF, the IDR Chairs will be
> sending out reviews of all IDR WG drafts relating to BGP-LS and BGP with SR
> routing.  This review is part of that per IETF cycle.
>
>
>
> Email for Shepherd Review of draft-ietf-idr-bgp-ls-te-path-01 (prior to
> IETF-121)
>
> https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/2zOuNqEeRe8kMqdKoLCfCV9_Htw/
>
>
>
> Wiki page with review history:
>
>
> https://wiki.ietf.org/e/en/group/idr/Shepherd-SR-BGP-LS/BGP-LS/draft-ietf-idr-bgp-ls-te-path
>
>
>
> Document reviewed: draft-ietf-idr-bgp-ls-te-path-02
>
> IDR Shepherd: Susan Hares
>
> Status: Needs review
>
> Technical status:  Generally valid, needs revisions 3
>
> Editorial status: Needs revision for clarity
>
>
>
> Leveraging Shepherds report for -01:
>
> Technical issues cleared: #1, #2, #4,#17, #18
>
> Technical issues remaining: #3, #5, #6-#16
>
> Editorial issues remaining: (all) NITS #1-#8
>
>
>
> Cheerily, Sue Hares
>