Re: [Idr] WG adoption call for draft-hr-idr-rfc5575bis-02 "Dissemination of Flow Specification Rules"

Christoph Loibl <c@tix.at> Sun, 29 January 2017 20:04 UTC

Return-Path: <c@tix.at>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B93B1295DC for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 29 Jan 2017 12:04:08 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yLu6H6vcDF4O for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 29 Jan 2017 12:04:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.hated.at (mail.hated.at [IPv6:2001:858:2:8::235]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3C4811295DB for <idr@ietf.org>; Sun, 29 Jan 2017 12:04:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: from 62-47-157-145.adsl.highway.telekom.at ([62.47.157.145] helo=[192.168.88.27]) by mail.hated.at with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <c@tix.at>) id 1cXvXS-0004T7-KN; Sun, 29 Jan 2017 20:53:27 +0100
From: Christoph Loibl <c@tix.at>
Message-Id: <5695B5BA-D452-49BB-974B-172ADDDD1C1E@tix.at>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_9DB88788-F639-4166-8E43-1944A0D238B7"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.1 \(3251\))
Date: Sun, 29 Jan 2017 21:04:00 +0100
In-Reply-To: <36E285C0-C716-437A-806D-A453273146DD@juniper.net>
To: "John G. Scudder" <jgs@juniper.net>
References: <36E285C0-C716-437A-806D-A453273146DD@juniper.net>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3251)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/7nFmBypBWrCeaR9mAWNKvnAuWCI>
Cc: idr@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Idr] WG adoption call for draft-hr-idr-rfc5575bis-02 "Dissemination of Flow Specification Rules"
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 29 Jan 2017 20:04:08 -0000

Hi All,

As an co-author of the draft I support the adoption. 

However, I noticed that I missed to post our recent paper on Flowspec interop to the IDR list. This paper illustrates (based on our lab setup) the current state of Flowspec implementations. Because of the incompatibilities observed we were inspired to co-author the draft-hr-idr-rfc5575bis to improve interoperability and stability.

You may download our paper at:

http://p4.tix.at/~cl/fs/loibl-bacher-bgp-flowspec-interop-012017.pdf <http://p4.tix.at/~cl/fs/loibl-bacher-bgp-flowspec-interop-012017.pdf>

Regards
Christoph


> On 21 Jan 2017, at 16:03, John G. Scudder <jgs@juniper.net> wrote:
> 
> Hi All,
> 
> The authors have requested IDR working group adoption of draft-hr-idr-rfc5575bis-02 "Dissemination of Flow Specification Rules". Please send your comments to the list.
> 
> This adoption call will conclude on Monday, February 6.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> —John
> _______________________________________________
> Idr mailing list
> Idr@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr

-- 
Christoph Loibl
c@tix.at <mailto:c@tix.at> | CL8-RIPE | PGP-Key-ID: 0x4B2C0055 | http://www.nextlayer.at <http://www.nextlayer.at/>