[Idr] Re: WG adoption call for draft-lin-idr-sr-epe-over-l2bundle-07 (8/2 to 8/16)

[Libin Liu <[e-mail]>]

Hi WG,

This document can aid BGP EPE operations and traffic scheduling within an L2 bundle. I support its adoption.


1. Does this BGP-LS addition help SR Egress Peering points in operational networks?
Yes.

2. Does this draft handle the BUM traffic in a way that Prevents looping?
Yes.

3. Are there any problems in the technology described?
No.


Best,
Libin


发件人: Susan Hares <[e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>>
发送时间: 2024年8月2日 22:12
收件人: [e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>
主题: [Idr] WG adoption call for draft-lin-idr-sr-epe-over-l2bundle-07 (8/2 to 8/16)



IDR WG:



This begins a 2 week WG adoption call for

draft-lin-idr-sr-epe-over-l2bundle-07.txt

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-lin-idr-sr-epe-over-l2bundle/





The authors should reply to this email with an

IPR statement indicating whether they know of an intellectual property.



This document describes how to support Segment Routing

BGP Egress Peer Engineering over Layer 2 bundle members.

This document updates [RFC9085] to allow the L2 Bundle Member

Attributes TLV to be added to the BGP-LS Attribute

associated with the Link NLRI of BGP peering link.





In your comments regarding adoption,  please consider



  1.  Does this BGP-LS addition help SR Egress Peering points

in operational networks?

  1.  Does this draft handle the BUM traffic in a way that

Prevents looping?

(Broadcast, Unknown Unicast, and Multicast (BUM))

  1.  Are there any problems in the technology described?



Cheerily, Sue Hares