[Idr] FW: IDR Status - 3/4/2020
Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com> Tue, 03 March 2020 17:14 UTC
Return-Path: <shares@ndzh.com>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50B0B3A23AD for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 3 Mar 2020 09:14:57 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 1.235
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.235 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DOS_OUTLOOK_TO_MX=2.845, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, KHOP_HELO_FCRDNS=0.276, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, T_KAM_HTML_FONT_INVALID=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JwASJRewd7wG for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 3 Mar 2020 09:14:55 -0800 (PST)
Received: from hickoryhill-consulting.com (50-245-122-100-static.hfc.comcastbusiness.net [50.245.122.100]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 65BCB3A23AC for <idr@ietf.org>; Tue, 3 Mar 2020 09:14:55 -0800 (PST)
X-Default-Received-SPF: pass (skip=loggedin (res=PASS)) x-ip-name=166.177.57.99;
From: Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com>
To: "'idr@ietf. org'" <idr@ietf.org>
Date: Tue, 03 Mar 2020 12:14:50 -0500
Message-ID: <01f501d5f17f$402f7410$c08e5c30$@ndzh.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_01F6_01D5F155.57609800"
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Thread-Index: AdXxfm5VDzxtMVhyQJiTx51eCj8LEA==
Content-Language: en-us
X-Antivirus: AVG (VPS 200303-0, 03/03/2020), Outbound message
X-Antivirus-Status: Not-Tested
X-Authenticated-User: skh@ndzh.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/7wG5R_bQmDw5fsj8uhnKy_v-Xvc>
Subject: [Idr] FW: IDR Status - 3/4/2020
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 Mar 2020 17:14:58 -0000
Hi all: We are heading toward IETF where we will have: 1) Discussion on Flow specification next steps 2) Auto configuration discussion - based on design group I only have 1 WG LC going this week, and all adoptions are waiting on IPR calls. I can run additional WG LC and WG adoptions. I would like to run an interest calls for any new flow specification drafts. For the existing flow specification drafts, would you please let me know If you plan to update your draft before IETF. Cheerily, Sue ================ At RFC editor - missing reference * <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-idr-bgp-ls-segment-routing-ext/ > draft-ietf-idr-bgp-ls-segment-routing-ext-16 [243 days] * Draft-ietf-idr-bgp-ls-segment-routing-epe-19.txt [288 days] Sent to IESG for publication --- Turning on 1) <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-idr-tunnel-encaps/> draft-ietf-idr-tunnel-encaps-14 - sent to IESG Shepherd: John Scudder Status: revised draft needed [IESG Publication requested: 10/10/2019 AD evaluation begins: 1/17/2020 - 2/21/2020] Waiting for draft since: 2/21/2020 2) draft-ietf-idr-bgp-ls-segment-routing-msd-08.txt [Shepherd: Susan Hares] Status: Revised ID submitted, Awaiting AD response IESG Publication requested: 10/15/2019 AD evaluation beings: 2/21/2020 AD evaluation ends: 2/26/2020] Revised ID submitted: 2/28/2020 Shepherd's comments updated: 3/3/2020 3) draft-ietf-idr-capabilities-registry-change-05.txt [Shepherd: Susan Hares] Status: Awaiting revised ID [21 days] [IESG Publication requested: 10/15/2019 AD Evaluation begins: 2/11/2020 AD Evaluation ends: 2/11/2020] ---------- WG LC done - needing adjustments before submission to IESG 1) draft-ietf-idr-rfc5575bis-19.txt - Shepherd: John Scudder Status: Awaiting John Scudder's mail list call Pending since: 1/23/2020 2) draft-ietf-idr-flowspec-path-redirect-09.txt Shepherd: Susan Hares Status: Support for WG publication, but interoperability issues raised Next steps: 1) Consider John Scudder's email on RFC5575bis 2) Discuss whether this should be one of Flow Spec -NG 3) draft-ietf-idr-rfc8203bis.05.txt Shepherd: Susan Hares Next Steps: submit -06.txt Waiting Revised ID: Draft -06.txt - with IANA nits fixed. Waiting Time: 4 months ID: Authors: All you need to do is replace the following text in the IANA Section Old: /Cease Notification message subcodes/ New: /BGP Cease NOTIFICATION message subcodes/ Please - it is a 5 minute fix. 4) draft-ietf-idr-ext-opt-param [Shepherd: Susan Hares] Next Steps: a) Author: Wiki report on implementations needs details on what is supported by each implementation b) Shepherd write-up: [ETA 3/8] 5) draft-idr-eag-distribution-09.txt - Shepherd: Susan Hares WG LC: [10/30/2019 to 11/13/2019] - extended for 1 week to 11/24. Status: [on hold awaiting decision from AD and WG chairs] ETA: 3/8/2020 WG LC --------- 1) Draft-ietf-idr-flow-spec-v6-10.txt WG LC: 3/3/ to 3/17/2020 Shepherd [John Scudder] Comment: v6 additions to RFC5575bis Needed for v4 publication at IESG WG adoption (non-flow specification drafts) ----------------------------- 1) draft-li-idr-sr-policy-path-mtu-03.txt IPR call: 2/24 to 3/4/2020 Status: IPR missing: Y. Zhu, A. Sawaf WG Adoption/ Interest Calls: for Flow Specification information =============== Since the flow specification will require a IETF 107 WG discussion, These WG adoption calls are interest calls. We hope to provide the 1) draft-li-idr-flowspec-srv6-02.txt IPR response missing from: Huaimo Chen, Chris Loibl, Y. Fan, L. Liu, X. Liu WG Adoption requested (on hold) -------------------------------------------- Draft-wu-idr-bgp-segment-allocation-ext-04.txt Status: IPR call in progress 1) IPR - No responses received, please send IPR response 2) WG adoption on hold due to on list discuss AD's Comments requiring in depth work to solve: ---------------------------------- 1) draft-ietf-idr-bgp-bestpath-selection-criteria-12 Status: AD discussion requires rework of draft. 2) <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-idr-bgp-optimal-route-reflectio n/> draft-ietf-idr-bgp-optimal-route-reflection-20 Status: Awaiting a rework of draft. In Early Allocation: . draft-ietf-idr-flowspec-nv03-06.txt - Status: in progress with chair/expert reviewers ETA: 3/8 . draft-ietf-idr-flowspec-nv03-13.txt Status: in progress with chair/expert reviewers
- [Idr] FW: IDR Status - 3/4/2020 Susan Hares