[Idr] IPR Call and WG Adoption for draft-qin-idr-sr-policy-ifit-04.txt (11/1/2020 to 11/16/2020)

Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com> Mon, 02 November 2020 05:57 UTC

Return-Path: <shares@ndzh.com>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D1753A0DBE for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 1 Nov 2020 21:57:05 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 1.224
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.224 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DOS_OUTLOOK_TO_MX=2.845, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, KHOP_HELO_FCRDNS=0.275, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id y1jF7iwIjRcP for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 1 Nov 2020 21:57:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: from hickoryhill-consulting.com (50-245-122-97-static.hfc.comcastbusiness.net []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D1DEF3A0DBD for <idr@ietf.org>; Sun, 1 Nov 2020 21:57:03 -0800 (PST)
X-Default-Received-SPF: pass (skip=loggedin (res=PASS)) x-ip-name=;
From: Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com>
To: idr@ietf.org
Date: Mon, 02 Nov 2020 00:56:46 -0500
Message-ID: <055301d6b0dc$f84da4a0$e8e8ede0$@ndzh.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0554_01D6B0B3.0F788700"
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Thread-Index: Adaw2PtgBctpKEXkRb++HOEf6MFzKA==
Content-Language: en-us
X-Antivirus: AVG (VPS 201101-6, 11/01/2020), Outbound message
X-Antivirus-Status: Not-Tested
X-Authenticated-User: skh@ndzh.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/8ehFUJAW6tw89eAZNzW3WEUuH-4>
Subject: [Idr] IPR Call and WG Adoption for draft-qin-idr-sr-policy-ifit-04.txt (11/1/2020 to 11/16/2020)
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Nov 2020 05:57:05 -0000

This begins a 2 week WG adoption call for
draft-qin-idr-sr-policy-ifit-04.txt (11/2/2020 to 11/16/2020). 


The draft can be accessed at: 



The authors should provide IPR statements by 11/5/2020 so the IDR WG can
consider the IPR status in their 



This draft adds the IFIT sub-TLV to the BGP Tunnel Encaps attribute for the
SR policy tunnel type. This sub-TLV is only valid for SR Policy tunnel
types.  Within the IFIT  sub-TLV value field, 5 sub-TLVs may be included (4
for IOAM and 1 for Enhanced Alternate Marking).   


The IDR co-chairs thank the authors for their patience.  The WG adoption
call for this draft has been delayed by the process of switching shepherds
for BGP Tunnel Encaps draft.  Many BESS and IDR drafts currently refer to
the BGP tunnel encapsulation drafts. 


In your review of this draft, please differentiate between the following: 

.         Support/rejection of In-situ Flow Telemetry (IFIT) as a IP routing

.         Support/rejection of alternate marking as a IP routing technology,

.         Support/rejection of adding new sub-TLVS for SR Policy tunnel type
of BGP Tunnel Encap Attribute, and   

.         Specific issues with the descriptions of these features in the


Cheers, Susan Hares