Re: [Idr] Brian Haberman's No Objection on draft-ietf-idr-error-handling-18: (with COMMENT)

["Susan Hares" <[e-mail]>]

Brian:

My recollection is that there was a lengthy outage caused by a bogus route received by IBGP and then sent to the rest  of the world.   Rob Shakir may have a better memory.  After the draft deadline, I will look for the incident's write-up in NANOG or in my BGP mail archive.  Therefore, the word RECOMMEND was considered appropriate. 


Sue 

-----Original Message-----
From: Brian Haberman [mailto:[e-mail]] 
Sent: Friday, March 06, 2015 3:41 PM
To: The IESG
Cc: [e-mail]; [e-mail]; [e-mail]; [e-mail]
Subject: Brian Haberman's No Objection on draft-ietf-idr-error-handling-18: (with COMMENT)

Brian Haberman has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-idr-error-handling-18: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to http://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-idr-error-handling/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Thank you for a clearly written document.  The only point I will make is that I do not think the 2119 keywords in section 6 are necessary.