IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Idr] WG LC on draft-ietf-idr-eag-distribution-09.txt (10/30 to 11/13/2019)

"Ketan Talaulikar (ketant)" <ketant@cisco.com> Sat, 02 November 2019 13:39 UTC

Return-Path: <ketant@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06FCC120046 for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 2 Nov 2019 06:39:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.499
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.499 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com header.b=V9+0d827; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com header.b=eAiYyul6
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id d1ujcMWFsJ5H for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 2 Nov 2019 06:39:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from alln-iport-6.cisco.com (alln-iport-6.cisco.com [173.37.142.93]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A1361120033 for <idr@ietf.org>; Sat, 2 Nov 2019 06:39:11 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=8802; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1572701951; x=1573911551; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:references:in-reply-to: mime-version; bh=xXgoIEFkEpvUx9f8+G4QDMB53aOP3UFdWPknreYtwjQ=; b=V9+0d827Ba4+YmkLKYmnPW54J1P+fNuvvAzjXYKkQAj31SLmtE8OS09o W1d7wnbA6re0Wrfo0ehTkv5aikmvOFAuzJWgfOVj/x5u9Ox6oKvMtIGuz 07HoXHwBSPdGMa1H/2l5dLhrPu5RMDOCyQHmYLLFUHZzfR/8nFJVwlHPp c=;
IronPort-PHdr: 9a23:uoWjThMJvb01xMhLT8Al6mtXPHoupqn0MwgJ65Eul7NJdOG58o//OFDEuKQ/l0fHCIPc7f8My/HbtaztQyQh2d6AqzhDFf4ETBoZkYMTlg0kDtSCDBj4IeLjaTASF8VZX1gj9Ha+YgBY
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0DtAgAZhr1d/4oNJK1lGwEBAQEBAQEFAQEBEQEBAwMBAQGBfYEcL1AFbFggBAsqhCmDRgOKc06CEJMchGGCUgNUCQEBAQwBASUIAgEBhEACF4NkJDgTAgMLAQEEAQEBAgEFBG2FNwyFUQEBAQEDEgsGChMBATgPAgEIDgMEAQErAgICMB0IAQEEARIIGoMBgXlNAy4BDqVHAoE4iGB1gTKCfgEBBYUUGIIXAwaBNowTGIFAP4FXgkw+gQSBXgICgWErgmMygiyPfYU7mD0KgiSHEY5AmWWFU4hviC6RJgIEAgQFAg4BAQWBaSKBWHAVgydQERSDBoNzhRSFP3SBKI1FAQE
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.68,259,1569283200"; d="scan'208,217";a="371203642"
Received: from alln-core-5.cisco.com ([173.36.13.138]) by alln-iport-6.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA; 02 Nov 2019 13:39:10 +0000
Received: from XCH-RCD-003.cisco.com (xch-rcd-003.cisco.com [173.37.102.13]) by alln-core-5.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id xA2Dd9uO011866 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Sat, 2 Nov 2019 13:39:10 GMT
Received: from xhs-rcd-003.cisco.com (173.37.227.248) by XCH-RCD-003.cisco.com (173.37.102.13) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3; Sat, 2 Nov 2019 08:39:09 -0500
Received: from xhs-rcd-001.cisco.com (173.37.227.246) by xhs-rcd-003.cisco.com (173.37.227.248) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3; Sat, 2 Nov 2019 08:39:09 -0500
Received: from NAM03-CO1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (72.163.14.9) by xhs-rcd-001.cisco.com (173.37.227.246) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3 via Frontend Transport; Sat, 2 Nov 2019 08:39:08 -0500
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=SYfQ1BonRJRNpJgBM7SocptV2bdn2Ya0Fb4i4e/JZg3JDCSwn0Mb63l9EKntd4+61hXWLkvZVFwyyTW+8Sfzy7QiU0mEvJ5zAyRtk4lYQrPOH1Ap2hoK6HAy+E/MKhC5WMfvCQcbRHGHY+U+uKfffP6h3kUKv9MVICmd3QTfi1VvDblkWD86ZWeiDjMWzJWyvu6UfPV6WJ+E4kJjBooTrVA7D8/jwRgx7/NBoHvZbz9YDdCWyM9Gf6bBW2oWC4KfuPoYZ9Umx3DZj+b/MQSKN/tcQqwBohcn18RfUe/311CY2t+bAFKSzkS8/tABrkIKY7xI0P9TXQSDRamlI2OK1g==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=xXgoIEFkEpvUx9f8+G4QDMB53aOP3UFdWPknreYtwjQ=; b=fuq/EiuCnIVsioTROxYu5xEMLzv8YpqwGpfIOXeJUcXMKr6yH0uJgj6pRY6PMn6gr4MP6KfQZ+7pIzQvufH+CYNvAEDvBEzYN1xjBPD8Gsl0mjbgMbkB4EIjTNscLDwUo87o3x1GXoXv/0nRgbXckNjq7l9nW7Wl1L6Bc5yXj5G468wWlmXk+BtNZ4TsuWglzZVX1Xfsgt8TQJ0uEydvO6HV7yVmD5wb8y1ylzBzxXYS1egcZrgH/Fvl9acM848H3N+NEbSVijMfkEAE11rmOjpwxZd2wwwxX6CN2vH4KUZcGB4f/ojLBQOuICIhdIkDz0o05oq5DJJbm7iUIRk3Jw==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=cisco.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=cisco.com; dkim=pass header.d=cisco.com; arc=none
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector2-cisco-onmicrosoft-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=xXgoIEFkEpvUx9f8+G4QDMB53aOP3UFdWPknreYtwjQ=; b=eAiYyul6z6Q9j4cWknl+xT0tFfkMRgaAHmGuajSNV0L5bkYM5zOJRTfnrjhIHQgh0cckmRnR4t25usrnnhV0fhmBGIUUSTP+ZWphyYlZfgkiICN1F2jvdXHSl6nhxD285TbUoNPBb/TujXhxlCwQSuf4tv8s9lzECT4Ky4DAM7Q=
Received: from CY4PR11MB1541.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (10.172.68.150) by CY4PR11MB1416.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (10.173.16.142) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.2408.24; Sat, 2 Nov 2019 13:39:08 +0000
Received: from CY4PR11MB1541.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::d3a:84a6:be65:e33f]) by CY4PR11MB1541.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::d3a:84a6:be65:e33f%11]) with mapi id 15.20.2387.028; Sat, 2 Nov 2019 13:39:08 +0000
From: "Ketan Talaulikar (ketant)" <ketant@cisco.com>
To: Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com>, 'idr wg' <idr@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Idr] WG LC on draft-ietf-idr-eag-distribution-09.txt (10/30 to 11/13/2019)
Thread-Index: AdWPJPqmUURw1HlxSJ6RzWhR5/pNigCXbsdA
Date: Sat, 02 Nov 2019 13:39:07 +0000
Message-ID: <CY4PR11MB15412B9865F7C3033787E310C17D0@CY4PR11MB1541.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
References: <01a301d58f25$8c17ce70$a4476b50$@ndzh.com>
In-Reply-To: <01a301d58f25$8c17ce70$a4476b50$@ndzh.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=ketant@cisco.com;
x-originating-ip: [2405:201:1800:c766:3561:9fe4:5e7b:45f6]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: cb110528-b79e-422f-f0a4-08d75f9a0935
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: CY4PR11MB1416:
x-ms-exchange-purlcount: 1
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <CY4PR11MB1416ADE01EF5C331960D2CEDC17D0@CY4PR11MB1416.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:8273;
x-forefront-prvs: 0209425D0A
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10009020)(4636009)(366004)(396003)(39860400002)(346002)(136003)(376002)(199004)(189003)(2906002)(55016002)(9686003)(229853002)(6306002)(54896002)(6116002)(790700001)(7736002)(236005)(74316002)(256004)(6246003)(14444005)(5660300002)(4744005)(478600001)(86362001)(81166006)(71190400001)(71200400001)(446003)(11346002)(476003)(66556008)(66476007)(66446008)(64756008)(66946007)(76116006)(81156014)(52536014)(8676002)(14454004)(606006)(9326002)(8936002)(186003)(46003)(110136005)(6506007)(53546011)(316002)(102836004)(76176011)(6436002)(486006)(33656002)(7696005)(99286004)(25786009)(966005); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101; SCL:1; SRVR:CY4PR11MB1416; H:CY4PR11MB1541.namprd11.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; LANG:en; PTR:InfoNoRecords; A:1; MX:1;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: cisco.com does not designate permitted sender hosts)
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0;
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: gnRipuSFP5rroelr4SE4s0QWn2xgz6NNMX7BBy6u/Zdq9T2UyBljLusHkpqxZELxRZL2FZ5M3ChpbtcIVQr4MYhk8zhHHPQpSuesSE0lttvV1EITjKt0VxvsxRfi1brtUi6uaaoFIx81IF34hE7IrLP01kFu0T+k3kGn1jkiz//pfzt5lMahfQHwpDq+DlpT3fk0Ph6rcUrcmKbFgm2P8aF8DVS0PQLAhCKe2tq5j/6ondpm0S7g2IpUjlfrKwyas+KhsbfoeNqQH9hLNeroEBXYnT+q2pPA2gB6NXFg5tKJJgywwpMz3qlOHjJkje6+2iFATpeHY/3NEbUzQGyPwffa1zAteuXGhPMdXNdhZlEEwD531r5eh1AHyKwe4bEHmsJowpOI8r9BAj8xe4iPP5KedUqHqwjZQEA898M+c2uf/daLgB7xLnKRMDGgckkWi0senYj8AzVi1NCzSXHgqSicttfC0bGQ6TKT8tCrS04=
x-ms-exchange-transport-forked: True
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_CY4PR11MB15412B9865F7C3033787E310C17D0CY4PR11MB1541namp_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: cb110528-b79e-422f-f0a4-08d75f9a0935
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 02 Nov 2019 13:39:07.8857 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 5ae1af62-9505-4097-a69a-c1553ef7840e
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: APjNC0tP2SCSZXKGLxmQ15mLvHweC25ORdkmDwRB55bOfnBPMp4n0A/n3Vdjrc3I45TdAleGOyDhqJMUuAyzUQ==
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: CY4PR11MB1416
X-OriginatorOrg: cisco.com
X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 173.37.102.13, xch-rcd-003.cisco.com
X-Outbound-Node: alln-core-5.cisco.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/8uj0apTDXc9bKsy-mou4C2oAMTs>
Subject: Re: [Idr] WG LC on draft-ietf-idr-eag-distribution-09.txt (10/30 to 11/13/2019)
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Nov 2019 13:39:14 -0000

Hi Sue,

I see that there are only 2 Cisco implementations on the report now and I can confirm that they have interoperated. I am not sure about other implementations and I am not aware of their interoperability aspects.

Thanks,
Ketan

From: Idr <idr-bounces@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Susan Hares
Sent: 30 October 2019 18:56
To: 'idr wg' <idr@ietf.org>
Subject: [Idr] WG LC on draft-ietf-idr-eag-distribution-09.txt (10/30 to 11/13/2019)

This begins a 2 week WG last call for draft-ietf-idr-eag-distribution-09.txt.

The first thing the authors need to do during the WG LC is to indicate whether the protocol implementation report  on this draft is accurate on the IDR Wiki:

 https://trac.ietf.org/trac/idr/wiki/draft-ietf-idr-eag-distribution%20implementations

The IDR WG needs to know whether the 4 implementations indicated (2 cisco and 2 Huawei) have interoperated using this TLV code point.   The current web page leaves some doubt.

Cheerily, Susan Hares

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email