Re: [Idr] Vendor Defaults (was Re: Review of draft-ietf-large-community-06.txt)

Peter Hessler <phessler@theapt.org> Mon, 07 November 2016 10:23 UTC

Return-Path: <phessler@theapt.org>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E49C2129684 for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 7 Nov 2016 02:23:10 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.398
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.398 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.497, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id RgBl1X08GxMs for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 7 Nov 2016 02:23:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: from gir.theapt.org (gir.theapt.org [IPv6:2001:470:1f0b:8b2::2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 54A7E1294D8 for <idr@ietf.org>; Mon, 7 Nov 2016 02:23:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: from gir.theapt.org (unknown [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 (256/0 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) (Authenticated sender: phessler) by gir.theapt.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A1C6F788FC for <idr@ietf.org>; Mon, 7 Nov 2016 11:23:07 +0100 (CET)
Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2016 11:23:06 +0100
From: Peter Hessler <phessler@theapt.org>
To: idr@ietf.org
Message-ID: <20161107102306.GV24817@gir.theapt.org>
References: <CAH1iCiq6jNtnkta0Bt952EQ9zOKSGt=_cCySsT5XuOKuHYO2nQ@mail.gmail.com> <86860386-9C2B-4BD5-B457-2A6DA5446CF3@cisco.com> <20161106040849.GB18931@shrubbery.net> <5BD3C90E-CC0E-42D2-9ACD-5787FC75BF0A@cisco.com> <20161106194258.GB5113@pfrc.org> <CA+b+ERnEDrPi4SAR9_R1zmwbYCE9aQEQjZN8tK09Y8csMDchVw@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CA+b+ERnEDrPi4SAR9_R1zmwbYCE9aQEQjZN8tK09Y8csMDchVw@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/8yeqVwG-zruI0O94YB7peGqiX-M>
Subject: Re: [Idr] Vendor Defaults (was Re: Review of draft-ietf-large-community-06.txt)
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2016 10:23:12 -0000

On 2016 Nov 06 (Sun) at 22:50:24 +0100 (+0100), Robert Raszuk wrote:
:I really wanted to make sure that large is deployed with defaults which
:make most sense and such defaults are identical between implementations.
:And we can do it now or never as when the code is shipped out in first
:production release the gave is over.
:

In OpenBGPD our default is to propagate communities; normal, extended,
and large.

We have no intention on changing that default.

Additionally, I see no reason why implementations should be have
identical defaults.  Cisco is not OpenBGPD, OpenBGPD is not Huewai, and
Huewai is not Quagga.

This is implementation specific, and has nothing to do with the
standardization process.

-- 
I am so optimistic about beef prices that I've just leased a pot roast
with an option to buy.