IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Idr] WGLC on draft-ietf-idr-as-private-reservation-00

Richard Hartmann <richih.mailinglist@gmail.com> Thu, 20 December 2012 11:49 UTC

Return-Path: <richih.mailinglist@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35CE721F86C1 for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 20 Dec 2012 03:49:57 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9WEKqNdIa8At for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 20 Dec 2012 03:49:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-la0-f52.google.com (mail-la0-f52.google.com [209.85.215.52]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 642BD21F8623 for <idr@ietf.org>; Thu, 20 Dec 2012 03:49:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-la0-f52.google.com with SMTP id l5so2830392lah.11 for <idr@ietf.org>; Thu, 20 Dec 2012 03:49:55 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=IwCyseXuOiTvcv31IeEQUgLhWPc/tFvdFzEXS/BWaJw=; b=gKoNWk7C/UGUoSrV9+fjArPOkFadJQjZfhs/06ZIh4jMdDeOB23hcNeudMMK1QJ8rw 7S4tvWRmhrjzs9VELSDdXCmUQ0GzsgvQjJcj/sRZ3bX/+qn+OJHSYl3jtgF2VCNFr110 BYzTHtr6qibCTGXRHwpfza4tqq+kgbxM8uP/b1uyWqDI+ZM8nksYBqhVRYuV7Q2GX9sf BiYsVtYLPZLahImkZQcdkWvt3tDf53WZJUM0jUVwFmlryO9dJDlgxy7oW34JVhnpu+0D Y/QdiJLnEoHCq2KdYJHWPWa9iQURQFPMC9r04ODycTVoTPfRka3KMHRIsNSExJru2uUj tj3g==
Received: by 10.152.131.168 with SMTP id on8mr8579754lab.38.1356004195093; Thu, 20 Dec 2012 03:49:55 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.152.170.132 with HTTP; Thu, 20 Dec 2012 03:49:35 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <50D1DEBF.7040500@foobar.org>
References: <20121211185917.GA21813@puck.nether.net> <CA+b+ERnzo2BLWjE1J_dMfYuExbG9WYJroPE4ZAWg++KK2_jy1g@mail.gmail.com> <CA+b+ERm=Agr7b6JXcXOwiP4wBjnEFmnVNt5fAJrn18R0hGtSzg@mail.gmail.com> <50C78C29.3070406@foobar.org> <50C8B8D9.4090903@umn.edu> <50C9039E.1050104@foobar.org> <20121213144147.GB4524@puck.nether.net> <50CB52E0.7080602@foobar.org> <20121214174012.GA18502@puck.nether.net> <50CE1D95.2000709@foobar.org> <20121217162903.GA15927@puck.nether.net> <50D1DEBF.7040500@foobar.org>
From: Richard Hartmann <richih.mailinglist@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2012 12:49:35 +0100
Message-ID: <CAD77+gQ6F29HmgPzGkV+pjoHczgN50rKGg_XrydyER5f7UVncg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Nick Hilliard <nick@foobar.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="f46d0433a0fc5ccc3f04d14754b9"
Cc: IETF IDR Working Group <idr@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Idr] WGLC on draft-ietf-idr-as-private-reservation-00
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/idr>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2012 11:49:57 -0000

On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 4:35 PM, Nick Hilliard <nick@foobar.org> wrote:


>  the bikeshed doesn't need any more paint thrown at it.
>

Agreed.


I.e. if you've reached 93% of the potential range, that's
> well beyond the point at which you need to plan to expand the range.
>

Also agreed.


So I'd say go ahead with 4200000000-end.  Thanks for taking Jeff's and my
> comments on board - very much appreciated.
>

And yet another agreement.


I believe that operational concerns have all been addressed so I'd like to
state "support" once again.


RIchard

v2.31.3 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status