IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Idr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-idr-large-community-01.txt

Nick Hilliard <nick@foobar.org> Wed, 05 October 2016 19:24 UTC

Return-Path: <nick@foobar.org>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D0261297F5 for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 5 Oct 2016 12:24:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.201
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.201 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Vm9y3VIDKqkU for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 5 Oct 2016 12:24:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.netability.ie (mail.netability.ie [IPv6:2a03:8900:0:100::5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 07CE212981F for <idr@ietf.org>; Wed, 5 Oct 2016 12:24:23 -0700 (PDT)
X-Envelope-To: idr@ietf.org
Received: from cupcake.local (admin.ibn.ie [46.182.8.8]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail.netability.ie (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id u95JOLQM042953 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 5 Oct 2016 20:24:21 +0100 (IST) (envelope-from nick@foobar.org)
X-Authentication-Warning: cheesecake.ibn.ie: Host admin.ibn.ie [46.182.8.8] claimed to be cupcake.local
Message-ID: <57F55364.3010302@foobar.org>
Date: Wed, 05 Oct 2016 20:24:20 +0100
From: Nick Hilliard <nick@foobar.org>
User-Agent: Postbox 5.0.3 (Macintosh/20160930)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Jeffrey Haas <jhaas@pfrc.org>
References: <147531113077.4216.12599976309263776317.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <20161001085434.GW20697@Vurt.local> <005b01d21d58$aaf869e0$4001a8c0@gateway.2wire.net> <20161003095936.GC20697@Vurt.local> <57F51937.70103@foobar.org> <4C5E4C28-E26F-44C3-A661-514328180F6E@pfrc.org> <57F52DC2.40809@foobar.org> <4CA1BEF7-B99D-4F86-A658-AE34420B3AB3@pfrc.org>
In-Reply-To: <4CA1BEF7-B99D-4F86-A658-AE34420B3AB3@pfrc.org>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.2.3
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/94CgizgLW6ZpT9vlm1FTst29XkY>
Cc: idr@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Idr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-idr-large-community-01.txt
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Oct 2016 19:24:25 -0000

Jeffrey Haas wrote:
> Once a security AD digs into the semantics of defined ext-comms and
> its impact on forwarding and thinks (erroneously) that the same
> blanket consideration may apply to Large, you'll have lost a week of
> your life.  Keep it simple (syntax/PDU) and clean.

yeah, I had to abandon the first two attempts to get the wording right
on this one.

Nick

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email