IETF Logo Mail Archive

[Idr] Re: Adoption call for draft-peng-idr-segment-routing-te-policy-attr-11 (7/12/2024 to 7/26/2024)

"lindagongxia@163.com" <lindagongxia@163.com> Thu, 25 July 2024 01:54 UTC

Return-Path: <lindagongxia@163.com>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3CC5C180B76 for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 24 Jul 2024 18:54:02 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.105
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.105 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=163.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bkn0BpI57X-x for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 24 Jul 2024 18:54:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from m15.mail.163.com (m15.mail.163.com [45.254.50.220]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B6E9C14F6BF for <idr@ietf.org>; Wed, 24 Jul 2024 18:54:01 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=163.com; s=s110527; h=Date:From:Subject:Mime-Version:Message-ID: Content-Type; bh=B7b7OIbx771NF1NpW2RkXzFt1n8Mgh3JvPNBUsyjIBk=; b=MzR/MAPrCvRDn9/vOPtjyzzVdjLUnHV9dJE+x0x4p00ithfa6hpHNWGoXvo644 URTG4Cp5NmXAr8djjOzIvZWS5H//oI7BZZQtnuSz+4Wzm1wP8Dj2+++n/oEZLJeT tKfozhrJcJS4czK/vFUwoJQiy9wDqK7zjQKv3MgTrbkqo=
Received: from LAPTOP-S3ERAHJK (unknown [119.143.145.161]) by gzga-smtp-mta-g0-4 (Coremail) with SMTP id _____wCnD3QysKFmMtruEA--.49126S2; Thu, 25 Jul 2024 09:53:55 +0800 (CST)
Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2024 09:53:54 +0800
From: "lindagongxia@163.com" <lindagongxia@163.com>
To: shares <shares@ndzh.com>, idr <idr@ietf.org>
X-Priority: 3
X-GUID: 8CC92BB9-65F0-4547-9BE0-EA07EDF50808
X-Has-Attach: no
X-Mailer: Foxmail 7.2.18.95[cn]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <2024072509535366572625@163.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_001_NextPart766485633644_=----"
X-CM-TRANSID: _____wCnD3QysKFmMtruEA--.49126S2
X-Coremail-Antispam: 1Uf129KBjDUn29KB7ZKAUJUUUUU529EdanIXcx71UUUUU7v73 VFW2AGmfu7bjvjm3AaLaJ3UbIYCTnIWIevJa73UjIFyTuYvjxU15l8UUUUU
X-Originating-IP: [119.143.145.161]
X-CM-SenderInfo: xolqvtpjrqw5lld6il2tof0z/xtbBaxYnX2V4HbI-oQAAsp
X-MailFrom: lindagongxia@163.com
X-Mailman-Rule-Hits: nonmember-moderation
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-idr.ietf.org-0
Message-ID-Hash: RR7YD3GLYXMD2KWAD3HYC33X36HOZDET
X-Message-ID-Hash: RR7YD3GLYXMD2KWAD3HYC33X36HOZDET
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Thu, 25 Jul 2024 07:38:44 -0700
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc4
Precedence: list
Subject: [Idr] Re: Adoption call for draft-peng-idr-segment-routing-te-policy-attr-11 (7/12/2024 to 7/26/2024)
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/9HrnH3D027SuiGaxVzJdIE2jqAc>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:idr-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:idr-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:idr-leave@ietf.org>

I support the adoption of the draft. 
  1.  Are new segment types needed for SR routing deployments?  Yes
  2.  Is the specification clear? Yes
  3.  Does this specification align with other spring documents? Yes, it's aligned with the existing documents.
Thanks！

Gong Xia

Chinatelecom


lindagongxia@163.com

v2.26.15 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status