Re: [Idr] IETF LC for IDR-ish document <draft-ietf-grow-bgp-reject-05.txt> (Default EBGP Route Propagation Behavior Without Policies) to Proposed Standard

Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists@gmail.com> Fri, 28 April 2017 14:51 UTC

Return-Path: <christopher.morrow@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C5A3129B2E for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 28 Apr 2017 07:51:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Wrq1ruqKlorS for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 28 Apr 2017 07:51:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qt0-x231.google.com (mail-qt0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c0d::231]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8FA6C129B01 for <idr@ietf.org>; Fri, 28 Apr 2017 07:47:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qt0-x231.google.com with SMTP id m36so51904993qtb.0 for <idr@ietf.org>; Fri, 28 Apr 2017 07:47:05 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc; bh=MwO2v8MIhQ2Hd4PDVh5cbCTfv7rQOI4sEMfgIQ9QUI4=; b=SXRievqgphdx87liIEIsHDaPvR0g2w1GjQd06yFrUEuG7pIypQPCztAkS1NhWiscUQ D5zn9TIR195JKPoznFYyuX4HnXOHbkT0xzeS/NTR80DrCTWEb/UhpgdYi9D1kGyf4JIY wfJel0mB8o1mn1BD5KS2Z88KfP3EgkkKSvhL4weuojqrMnk7Jg3d2qf7TLChOpG9mAnZ QIlAEWXJSnjtnk2P5uJqtiw0exjsQR2DCCYEIICoYkDiNdHxMxQQOsSzElxT4YZZDbae LjdDFjj2BMt9wTxSMeIyH2B6hbps/9KIpPD52gJBq4Kw3sFkPdGkfhQ5QcnTm4wafkTp TWCw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from :date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=MwO2v8MIhQ2Hd4PDVh5cbCTfv7rQOI4sEMfgIQ9QUI4=; b=HPbk6kCMoxw2A4YLdJ9jIG5hCRcnVYWKN4zv/ooDqgNpJsJu9AKnNtpGgRVPpigU0v HlTZ+3QmWQpeohm+UHjEdT5xvDHNfdde7hVRu9krmdHWRcj3LR+upyVYimiPLrxHfo4d uVgZKSZIXQFsfMR/CmkE4gC1d9ry2VtY8Rxh3olAuwHMVrE8dE6UX3yiiCQPBmY1eU+X /NDB0TdNTmD3buS4VvFDH8U//LTBPl5+kdZYMoNuqPI3RMOl8lSYB1KrBmJhmY58rJk7 D7+jvAIw26bQMLNt0XtyiziNBs2okMTGo50IBmVmWolQ3ORhPi0CMZ3ETCo2wci9+8mr X9CA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AN3rC/7QY7UZ6cvuaLzVnu2lBy4RUq8qJ65AGvn/UXtWF9lArRatWh9s UinjGYTtT8RlrXO/QUr6LSCexdd4wg==
X-Received: by 10.237.59.150 with SMTP id r22mr9901153qte.100.1493390824753; Fri, 28 Apr 2017 07:47:04 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: christopher.morrow@gmail.com
Received: by 10.140.93.5 with HTTP; Fri, 28 Apr 2017 07:47:03 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <m2y3uk7h8p.wl-randy@psg.com>
References: <D4E812E8-AA7B-4EA2-A0AC-034AA8922306@juniper.net> <9047A5A0-ED12-43C2-B2C5-D2A71CBB4373@arrcus.com> <D51D46A7.A9732%acee@cisco.com> <0A49219D-E721-4DA8-B9BF-A55C2FA36FBE@puck.nether.net> <D95C67A4-AEBF-400B-A360-61C342FD6E4A@arrcus.com> <CA+b+ER=hq0=JNRfF8VA76_aqeRMBCeyQm5aTbapysXGTgaGS_g@mail.gmail.com> <CAL9jLaakVACiZKjk6XUi9mwkrCRsPqONUQmrTBCN7V43y+RtrQ@mail.gmail.com> <m2y3uk7h8p.wl-randy@psg.com>
From: Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2017 10:47:03 -0400
X-Google-Sender-Auth: EhSGpEmeJI-iGvIgHYE59sjrV-4
Message-ID: <CAL9jLaZXqA8-LnAdNOfhCQA+pq1fh1site_shSH+-gH0hCNeqQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
Cc: Interminable Discussion Room <idr@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a114dc3469ed84d054e3b25ae
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/9YimhoiWh_6A42kWh9JbYfWoBR8>
Subject: Re: [Idr] IETF LC for IDR-ish document <draft-ietf-grow-bgp-reject-05.txt> (Default EBGP Route Propagation Behavior Without Policies) to Proposed Standard
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2017 14:51:10 -0000

On Fri, Apr 28, 2017 at 10:13 AM, Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>; wrote:

> is there a big enough win to break POLA?
>

POLA - principle of least resistance ... which I had to ask for a
definition of...

I think Job's (jared pointed out contradictory answers between parts of the
same vendor even!) said this previously: "There is no well known
expectation here", because each vendor does something different :( what's
frustrating as an operator is, sometimes inside a single vendor there is no
consensus.

Setting a well known standard starting point really would be helpful here.