Re: [Idr] draft-ietf-idr-as-pathlimit-02 status, path forward
Jeffrey Haas <jhaas@pfrc.org> Fri, 29 September 2006 18:27 UTC
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GTN4q-00055O-SW; Fri, 29 Sep 2006 14:27:12 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GTN4p-00055E-Ba for idr@ietf.org; Fri, 29 Sep 2006 14:27:11 -0400
Received: from manos.scc.mi.org ([204.11.140.250]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GTN4o-0000tn-4G for idr@ietf.org; Fri, 29 Sep 2006 14:27:11 -0400
Received: by manos.scc.mi.org (Postfix, from userid 1025) id E3EE74E7F6; Fri, 29 Sep 2006 14:26:52 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 14:26:52 -0400
From: Jeffrey Haas <jhaas@pfrc.org>
To: Yakov Rekhter <yakov@juniper.net>
Subject: Re: [Idr] draft-ietf-idr-as-pathlimit-02 status, path forward
Message-ID: <20060929182652.GA21554@scc.mi.org>
References: <200609261812.k8QICQg95521@merlot.juniper.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <200609261812.k8QICQg95521@merlot.juniper.net>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 2409bba43e9c8d580670fda8b695204a
Cc: idr@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/idr>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: idr-bounces@ietf.org
Yakov, While I think there's still some work left to be done, I think we are converging on a good answer. I support this. -- Jeff On Tue, Sep 26, 2006 at 11:12:26AM -0700, Yakov Rekhter wrote: > Folks, > > This e-mail is to find if there is a consensus within the IDR WG for a > request for an early allocation of a new BGP attribute code point > as specified in draft-ietf-idr-as-pathlimit-02. > > Please send your comments on this request. The deadline for comments > is Oct 10, 2006. > > Yakov. > > P.S. Please remember that silence does not count (either way). > > _______________________________________________ > Idr mailing list > Idr@ietf.org > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr _______________________________________________ Idr mailing list Idr@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr
- [Idr] draft-ietf-idr-as-pathlimit-02 status, path… Joe Abley
- [Idr] draft-ietf-idr-as-pathlimit-02 status, path… Yakov Rekhter
- Re: [Idr] draft-ietf-idr-as-pathlimit-02 status, … Paul Jakma
- Re: [Idr] draft-ietf-idr-as-pathlimit-02 status, … Scott Leibrand
- RE: [Idr] draft-ietf-idr-as-pathlimit-02 status, … Tony Li
- Re: [Idr] draft-ietf-idr-as-pathlimit-02 status, … Andrew Lee
- RE: [Idr] draft-ietf-idr-as-pathlimit-02 status, … Manav Bhatia
- Re: [Idr] draft-ietf-idr-as-pathlimit-02 status, … Russ White
- Re: [Idr] draft-ietf-idr-as-pathlimit-02 status, … Jeffrey Haas
- Re: [Idr] draft-ietf-idr-as-pathlimit-02 status, … Geoff Huston
- Re: [Idr] draft-ietf-idr-as-pathlimit-02 status, … Philip Smith
- Re: [Idr] draft-ietf-idr-as-pathlimit-02 status, … Enke Chen
- Re: [Idr] draft-ietf-idr-as-pathlimit-02 status, … Robert Raszuk
- Re: [Idr] draft-ietf-idr-as-pathlimit-02 status, … Mach Chen