IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Idr] WG Adoption call for drafts for Flow Specification option 1 (RFC5575 additions (filters/actions) 3/25 to 4/8/2016

"Steven Cheung (stecheun)" <stecheun@cisco.com> Sat, 02 April 2016 01:45 UTC

Return-Path: <stecheun@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A41812D515 for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 1 Apr 2016 18:45:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.53
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.53 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id KbFtApH0LEfI for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 1 Apr 2016 18:45:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-9.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-9.cisco.com [173.37.86.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C1BF012D1D5 for <idr@ietf.org>; Fri, 1 Apr 2016 18:45:01 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=13530; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1459561501; x=1460771101; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=ETJkTniO3Qe2PhLBOfHNjNoEXxii56h8Qo2G4zW7cy4=; b=JSRD/pDbIsKCacPuoTt4rNgixUxFSqZOxZT6VT3pM9CZh2N7pt5bQ3ZQ YwCtKBmjSPYYnNBdrDt5rf0ZMZLZwlxJqmuSGw8d3clGGE+8MIW4iP1U8 5HRRis5vO8gnygG0HWqRzmRvBeBze+C+9+B1F8z4FQ4ujQy26kYE9edIa k=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0AKAgD8Iv9W/5pdJa1dgmtMU30GhT+1UAENgXIjhBOBVwKBQzgUAQEBAQEBAWUnhEEBAQEEHRBMEAIBCA4DAwECJAQHMhQJCAEBBA4FiCcOxFwBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQERBIYehEaBN4JXEQE+DYUpBY4DhROEZAGFcogVgWaETYhajxkBHgEBQoIEDQwVgTVsAYcxNn4BAQE
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos; i="5.24,428,1454976000"; d="scan'208,217"; a="87010105"
Received: from rcdn-core-3.cisco.com ([173.37.93.154]) by rcdn-iport-9.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 02 Apr 2016 01:45:00 +0000
Received: from XCH-ALN-017.cisco.com (xch-aln-017.cisco.com [173.36.7.27]) by rcdn-core-3.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id u321j03p004198 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Sat, 2 Apr 2016 01:45:00 GMT
Received: from xch-aln-020.cisco.com (173.36.7.30) by XCH-ALN-017.cisco.com (173.36.7.27) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1104.5; Fri, 1 Apr 2016 20:44:59 -0500
Received: from xch-aln-020.cisco.com ([173.36.7.30]) by XCH-ALN-020.cisco.com ([173.36.7.30]) with mapi id 15.00.1104.009; Fri, 1 Apr 2016 20:44:59 -0500
From: "Steven Cheung (stecheun)" <stecheun@cisco.com>
To: Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com>
Thread-Topic: [Idr] WG Adoption call for drafts for Flow Specification option 1 (RFC5575 additions (filters/actions) 3/25 to 4/8/2016
Thread-Index: AdGGpJY5wzIcQ0EdQtuQOi1AWSw1WgEvHxWAAEPbLoA=
Date: Sat, 02 Apr 2016 01:44:59 +0000
Message-ID: <D32471FF.6CDC0%stecheun@cisco.com>
References: <000401d186a5$38fac760$aaf05620$@ndzh.com> <D322B1D3.11D83%mohamirz@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <D322B1D3.11D83%mohamirz@cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.6.2.160219
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.75.235.25]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_D32471FF6CDC0stecheunciscocom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/9iv0aIs_8PCKRb8vQQih34z88Eg>
Cc: "'idr@ietf. org'" <idr@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Idr] WG Adoption call for drafts for Flow Specification option 1 (RFC5575 additions (filters/actions) 3/25 to 4/8/2016
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Apr 2016 01:45:04 -0000

Hi, Sue, John,

Support: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-vandevelde-idr-flowspec-path-redirect/

Thanks.
-Steven

From: Idr <idr-bounces@ietf.org<mailto:idr-bounces@ietf.org>> on behalf of Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com<mailto:shares@ndzh.com>>
Date: Friday, March 25, 2016 at 7:47 AM
To: "'idr@ietf. org'" <idr@ietf.org<mailto:idr@ietf.org>>
Subject: [Idr] WG Adoption call for drafts for Flow Specification option 1 (RFC5575 additions (filters/actions) 3/25 to 4/8/2016

IDR WG:

This begins a 2 week WG Call (3/25 to 4/8/2016) for the set of drafts to be considered in RFC5575 additions. These options are filters, actions or critical security additions.  The flow specification work has been a part of the interims since IETF 94
https://www.ietf.org/proceedings/interim/2016/02/08/idr/proceedings.html
https://www.ietf.org/proceedings/interim/2016/03/07/idr/proceedings.html

There will be a brief flow specification presentation at IETF 95, and the email list has select to start with option 1 - extending RFC5575.  We also will be gathering details on the SDN/NFV use case for option 2 (new NLRI and Wide Communities support).

This is a group call for the drafts to be considered in the flow specification work.  For each of the drafts you wish to be considered Option 1, please indicate:


1)      If this option is valuable for the DDoS deployments or another critical deployments,

2)      Do you feel this draft is useful, but not ready for adoption,

3)      Do you feel this draft is a good start for this work.

The drafts to consider are:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-eddy-idr-flowspec-packet-rate/
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-hao-idr-flowspec-nvo3/
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-hao-idr-flowspec-redirect-tunnel/
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-li-idr-flowspec-redirect-generalized-sid/
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-liang-idr-bgp-flowspec-label/
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-litkowski-idr-flowspec-interfaceset/
<https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-li-idr-flowspec-redirect-generalized-sid/>https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-vandevelde-idr-flowspec-path-redirect/
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-yong-idr-flowspec-mpls-match/

And for the ordering of these filters and actions drafts - the Option 1 section out of this
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-hares-idr-flowspec-combo/
(A revised draft with just Option 1 will be posted)

Sue Hares and John Scudder

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email