[Idr] Warren Kumari's No Objection on draft-ietf-idr-flow-spec-v6-19: (with COMMENT)

Warren Kumari via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Wed, 04 November 2020 21:16 UTC

MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Warren Kumari via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-idr-flow-spec-v6@ietf.org, idr-chairs@ietf.org, idr@ietf.org, Jie Dong <jie.dong@huawei.com>, aretana.ietf@gmail.com, jie.dong@huawei.com, bill.wu@huawei.com, opsdir@ietf.org
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net>
Message-ID: <160452457177.31420.13870992674907142520@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Wed, 04 Nov 2020 13:16:12 -0800
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/9lApPETkzQiAAlNpdqPWDXEGCuE>
Subject: [Idr] Warren Kumari's No Objection on draft-ietf-idr-flow-spec-v6-19: (with COMMENT)

Warren Kumari has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-idr-flow-spec-v6-19: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-idr-flow-spec-v6/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Thanks to Qin Wu for the OpsDir review. if Qin hadn't asked the "why isn't this
folded into the upcoming -bis" (and Christoph's answer) I would have had to
ballot DISCUSS.

I do support Ben's DISCUSS, and, even more, Eric's

[Idr] Warren Kumari's No Objection on draft-ietf-… Warren Kumari via Datatracker
Re: [Idr] Warren Kumari's No Objection on draft-i… Susan Hares