Re: [Idr] IDR WG LC on draft-ietf-idr-ix-bgp-route-server (2/2/2015 - 2/16/2015)

Eduardo Ascenço Reis <eduardo@intron.com.br> Wed, 04 February 2015 15:24 UTC

Return-Path: <ear@intron.com.br>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9FEB1A8A90 for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 4 Feb 2015 07:24:52 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 3.176
X-Spam-Level: ***
X-Spam-Status: No, score=3.176 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.8, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, FRT_BELOW2=2.154, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ippST1CxPrBD for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 4 Feb 2015 07:24:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-we0-f169.google.com (mail-we0-f169.google.com [74.125.82.169]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2D07D1A8A96 for <idr@ietf.org>; Wed, 4 Feb 2015 07:24:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-we0-f169.google.com with SMTP id u56so2434002wes.0 for <idr@ietf.org>; Wed, 04 Feb 2015 07:24:49 -0800 (PST)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=gGoXMb1iNWYq3MzTOwv6ame5cdKwTmQ62Ec9S0dYOYM=; b=MfSMZPuy5BOnZSRYn+aXFM8oKYxUC5y4HzKg8l1UHKRB6hDXUcMNJr9fmMUMXsKWRN j+86Iw6yZr0l0uTjf6vikIQ3R3g9uvv5AtrZSQwxbGbbsATCMysu7hJa8WnLoFpgVMFR Rd8QgIR7rurLXZwg3qclspgMnz4YmsFNpo3kcFwhBWoWbN5h6aEY/7Xxub0EfWGuXxio 42S8ThH4yuF+Vrge5rlYk/v8Wevi8RbnXVLemUn2FdigXf3UxTbR7yi1n/MiYl4ATRCx Bk9BmQfwBY4vqNmVhPnNB7Aj1g8QS9gaiUSj6oHfCSICaCFvOoh2mqpcTuWiSgdKSesH CjFw==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmD9w05sAPCN2xgc8fhDicnCpab4mJ7GYjTFExFBkcGrTvP2yfNN68mXzFDbyB3Sy2EmlOn
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.180.73.239 with SMTP id o15mr45834302wiv.14.1423063488918; Wed, 04 Feb 2015 07:24:48 -0800 (PST)
Sender: ear@intron.com.br
Received: by 10.216.59.133 with HTTP; Wed, 4 Feb 2015 07:24:48 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <011c01d03f0e$c2ed7ba0$48c872e0$@ndzh.com>
References: <011c01d03f0e$c2ed7ba0$48c872e0$@ndzh.com>
Date: Wed, 04 Feb 2015 13:24:48 -0200
X-Google-Sender-Auth: aNhV-1tBJc72d-7ah9pGWRz-Zq0
Message-ID: <CAFwFV=jGwhZz-fd9eEB74_snWGyGvk7DqAx-QAtOgzVnHcm+1A@mail.gmail.com>
From: Eduardo Ascenço Reis <eduardo@intron.com.br>
To: Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/AE38C4bXZ52wRq9tqdp0wIUnzCw>
Cc: idr wg <idr@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Idr] IDR WG LC on draft-ietf-idr-ix-bgp-route-server (2/2/2015 - 2/16/2015)
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 Feb 2015 15:24:54 -0000

Dear Chairs and WG,

As an introduction, I am the technical manager and engineer leader of
PTT.br - the Brazilian Internet Exchange (IX) Point project.

PTT.br was started in 2004 and today it has 25 IX in production.

Information about aggregated traffic (agregado), network topology
(PIX) and participants AS (participantes) can be found for each
location on the URL bellow:

http://ptt.br/particip/sp

By the way, on the participants pages, ATM means in Portuguese Acordo
de Troca de Tráfego Multilateral or Multi-Lateral Peering Agreements
(MLPA).

For those interest on more information about PTT.br, please take a
look at [1] and [2] references in English.

PTT.br always used route servers as the control plane controller for
the MLPA on all and each IX location.

MLPA respond for more than 70% of traffic (the remaining if associated
with Bilateral Peering Agreements) and it has a fundamental importance
on PTT.br growth experience.

On most PTT.br IX locations two route servers are used for redundancy.
The biggest and most important (number of participants and traffic)
location is Sao Paulo, followed not close by Rio de Janeiro. On these
both locations PTT.br is using since last year four route servers for
network topology and implementation redundancy.

PTT.br provides looking glass (LG) access to route collector for real
time check. Sao Paulo IX lg is also running quagga and can be accessed
by:

telnet lg.sp.ptt.br

PTT.br has intensive use of all 3 route servers implementations (bird,
cisco and quagga) and confirm they accordance to the Implementation
Report.

Finally I strongly support both documents.

Regards,

Eduardo Ascenço Reis
eascenco [ @nic.br | @ptt.br | @gmail.com ]


[1] Peering in Brazil
PTT.br
IETF 88th – ISOC Panel
Regional Interconnection Overview
Vancouver, BC, Canada
November 6, 2013
http://ptt.br/doc/nic.br.ptt.br.ietf88.isoc.peering-brazil.2013110503.pdf


[2] PTT.br Report of the
FIFA World Cup Brazil 2014
Euro-ix
Bucharest, Romania
October 29th 2014
http://ptt.br/doc/nic.br.ptt.br.worldcup.report.euro-ix.20141024.pdf


2015-02-02 15:36 GMT-02:00 Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com>:
> WG LC  is from 2/2/2015 to 2/16/2015
>
>
>
> From: Idr [mailto:idr-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Susan Hares
> Sent: Monday, February 02, 2015 11:42 AM
> To: idr wg
> Subject: [Idr] IDR WG LC on draft-ietf-idr-ix-bgp-route-server
>
>
>
>
>
> This begins a 2 week WG LC for draft-ietf-ix-bgp-route-server-06, and a 2
> week WG adoption/LC for the associated WG report.
>
>
>
> You can find these drafts at:
>
>
>
> http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-idr-ix-bgp-route-server/
>
>
>
> http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-jasinska-ix-bgp-route-server-implementation/
>
>
>
> The draft-ietf-ix-bgp-route-server has demonstrated interoperability between
> Cisco, Quagga, and BIRD.
>
>
>
> Please comment on if you feel this is useful for operating exchange points,
> and include in your comments support or no support.
>
>
>
>
>
> Sue Hares and John Scudder
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Idr mailing list
> Idr@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr
>