[Idr] draft-ietf-idr-bgp-ls-registry-00.txt - WG LC (11/20 to 12/3/2019)

"Susan Hares" <shares@ndzh.com> Wed, 20 November 2019 07:33 UTC

Return-Path: <shares@ndzh.com>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0CC31120987 for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 19 Nov 2019 23:33:22 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 1.349
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.349 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DOS_OUTLOOK_TO_MX=2.845, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, KHOP_HELO_FCRDNS=0.4, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QHtda1FkJVzj for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 19 Nov 2019 23:33:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: from hickoryhill-consulting.com (50-245-122-100-static.hfc.comcastbusiness.net [50.245.122.100]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 81A3B1209CD for <idr@ietf.org>; Tue, 19 Nov 2019 23:33:20 -0800 (PST)
X-Default-Received-SPF: pass (skip=loggedin (res=PASS)) x-ip-name=31.133.145.85;
From: "Susan Hares" <shares@ndzh.com>
To: <idr@ietf.org>
Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2019 02:33:13 -0500
Message-ID: <000801d59f74$c700d180$55027480$@ndzh.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0009_01D59F4A.DE2AC980"
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Thread-Index: AdWfc+/y611qeyyoQKS6GO/CSI2LPg==
Content-Language: en-us
X-Antivirus: AVG (VPS 191119-0, 11/19/2019), Outbound message
X-Antivirus-Status: Not-Tested
X-Authenticated-User: skh@ndzh.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/AjbHAKhdzzfqWsmllQR8mY0TcRg>
Subject: [Idr] draft-ietf-idr-bgp-ls-registry-00.txt - WG LC (11/20 to 12/3/2019)
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2019 07:33:22 -0000

This begins a 2 week WG LC for draft-ietf-idr-bgp-ls-registry-00.txt.  

You can view the document at:

 

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-idr-bgp-ls-registry/

 

As you have read in previous, John and I think Adrian's proposal will  

help speed up the reviews for  BGP-LS values to be assigned out 

of the "Border Gateway Protocol - Link State (BGP-LS) Parameters Registry" 

by change the review  to Expert review. 

 

Please review this short document and see if you agree with John and I. 

 

If you find an problem in the draft, Adrian will be happy to discuss it with
you. 

 

Cheerily, Susan Hares