Re: [Idr] WG LC on draft-ietf-idr-eag-distribution-09.txt (10/30 to 11/13/2019) - Extended to 11/24/2019

"Susan Hares" <shares@ndzh.com> Mon, 18 November 2019 05:47 UTC

Return-Path: <shares@ndzh.com>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22F5912085E for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 17 Nov 2019 21:47:23 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 2.748
X-Spam-Level: **
X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.748 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_05=-0.5, DOS_OUTLOOK_TO_MX=2.845, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, KHOP_HELO_FCRDNS=0.4, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Gjr4pwlCSNML for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 17 Nov 2019 21:47:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: from hickoryhill-consulting.com (50-245-122-100-static.hfc.comcastbusiness.net [50.245.122.100]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BD17A12003E for <idr@ietf.org>; Sun, 17 Nov 2019 21:47:21 -0800 (PST)
X-Default-Received-SPF: pass (skip=forwardok (res=PASS)) x-ip-name=31.133.148.129;
From: "Susan Hares" <shares@ndzh.com>
To: "'idr wg'" <idr@ietf.org>
Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2019 00:47:18 -0500
Message-ID: <018e01d59dd3$a5092d40$ef1b87c0$@ndzh.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_018F_01D59DA9.BC3436B0"
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Thread-Index: AdWd01NR7un7mGIKQpyQ2vS9svy1Ng==
Content-Language: en-us
X-Antivirus: AVG (VPS 191117-0, 11/17/2019), Outbound message
X-Antivirus-Status: Not-Tested
X-Authenticated-User: skh@ndzh.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/Awi83QiQxG342cXWcj4s5F3nCcQ>
Subject: Re: [Idr] WG LC on draft-ietf-idr-eag-distribution-09.txt (10/30 to 11/13/2019) - Extended to 11/24/2019
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2019 05:47:23 -0000

Greetings IDR: 

-------------------

 

This is an extension of the WG LC (10/30 to 11/13/2019) to 11/24/2019.    This is the second attempt at WG LC that has received little or no comment on IDR.    

 

Is the conclusion that this chair should draw is that there is no interest in publishing this draft?  Please comment to the list publically or privately to the chairs. 

 

Thank you, 

 

Susan Hares 

 

-------------




 

This begins a 2 week WG last call for draft-ietf-idr-eag-distribution-09.txt. 

 

The first thing the authors need to do during the WG LC is to indicate whether the protocol implementation report  on this draft is accurate on the IDR Wiki:

 

 https://trac.ietf.org/trac/idr/wiki/draft-ietf-idr-eag-distribution%20implementations

 

The IDR WG needs to know whether the 4 implementations indicated (2 cisco and 2 Huawei) have interoperated using this TLV code point.   The current web page leaves some doubt. 

 

Cheerily, Susan Hares