Re: [Idr] WGLC on draft-ietf-idr-as-private-reservation-00

[Brian Dickson <[e-mail]>]

Given that 1930 has defined Private Use, maybe instances of either of the
two lower-case terms ("private use" or "local") could be replaced with
mixed-case "Private Use"?

It is not as aesthetically pleasing, but it removes ambiguity, IMHO, as
most folks are (I hope) familiar enough with Defined Terms having Special
Meaning. :-)

Just my $0.02.

Brian

On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 4:07 PM, Jon Mitchell <[e-mail]>wrote:

> On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 09:08:06AM -0600, David Farmer wrote:
> > Thanks for the excellent reference.
> >
> > With that, I think keeping the current title and using the term
> > "private use" in most of instances is appropriate.  However, I'd
> > would like to suggest the phrase "local or private use" be used in
> > the first sentence of the abstract and introduction sections,
> > keeping "private use" only elsewhere.  And, I think it would be
> > great if you could add the reference below in the first sentence of
> > the introduction as well.
>
> I think the use of "local" has a less exact definition (local to what)
> and don't feel this adds significant value to the draft.  Further, I
> think the motivation paragraph saying this is for a single organization
> addresses the scope that private ASNs are meant to have already (as well
> as many of the concerns expressed about people using this for ISP
> customers which I'm not sure could be called the same organization by
> any definition as the entity allocating the ASNs).  All other parts of
> the draft appear to use the term "private use" consistently.
>
> >
> > Pulling something out of my other message, I think adding "by
> > replacing Section 10 in its entirety." to the end of the abstract
> > clarifies how this draft intends to updates RFC 1930.
>
> I think this adds clarity on what parts of RFC 1930 this impacts and am
> willing to make this change to the abstract.  I don't think this
> represents an actual content change to the draft however...
>
> Jon
>
>
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> _______________________________________________
> Idr mailing list
> [e-mail]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr
>