IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Idr] Tunnel-Encap Gaps for SD-WAN described in draft-ietf-rtgwg-net2cloud-gap-analysis-02.txt

Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net> Wed, 26 June 2019 23:09 UTC

Return-Path: <robert@raszuk.net>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F71D12019C for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 26 Jun 2019 16:09:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=raszuk.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8vk6OUVvyDuk for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 26 Jun 2019 16:09:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qt1-x832.google.com (mail-qt1-x832.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::832]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E0C261201B7 for <idr@ietf.org>; Wed, 26 Jun 2019 16:09:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qt1-x832.google.com with SMTP id p15so465700qtl.3 for <idr@ietf.org>; Wed, 26 Jun 2019 16:09:26 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=raszuk.net; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=v/S8vDCrUnKx5AiN7U836gG93WHkS1BQqealTK75k3Q=; b=VlW9Bj7aVWOVtbm7OG/qrrSWDV7GLA3NxdwI+7Aol9jK0bxpokAUU3HcqNuhg8cQ4Z WweHdvMslj3SkA9fDWb5+heG1qeUMpFexNjSJgceiEg1ji92jgDPOa/KT+jUCdV6k0qc KYxPTlWT2wlOTQhgkR6zuD5TDdRkw1s65lXTmeAlBiE/SgUqDB+m7JFpIP2hvxMeYO/h b3S7tcccDW9GGliK0mEOX4URGMHy7xBGxTX6SRE+KhesGoNcnFCrmNLrkR48TiVKsuSE gqYOC3KhTWJttlJIAZ7MeeXZL+usRO4hcDxdxCnW0KKsyRxLBgSlbZXX+C6abIyOkknc 7bDA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=v/S8vDCrUnKx5AiN7U836gG93WHkS1BQqealTK75k3Q=; b=LtB6JrVzh0oPsUrp5GxTloFI9JxUPU0FaGLabVic81M/FcRHG/ABHyNMvooyF5O2Xf 2+wL6C3EeG8ETtRtnOzbRDHZDqt/Tl+V4EZ2Fiu8lUmkl1rRW0Ywncibu2m0DNoURtUA rg3uX1H+8pWDjeC6T2PIjYhQf6V7q1uCMnaofiiQzIIsY17624BL/vKgmEuF5WOV26f1 W65LGklVgV1mOLQS5mhZW/vydfakyTtYf9PvWZVj9fitmgZZ0FoA0J7mg693/VN6MBW0 T0ZR3LhevX9R59Nq30xMlF5X0iRm2NEtIm3dHKq1gr/U/1jhvHlpVaiGj+qmoqRQcniR Ma5A==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWaLdAwDeO0O/OhIFEccgTcAxn7l4sSAiC9aUyeQ+Mqi4gduNIO j0ucNwW+BqJaCixPEm56tO+vjnqLp5LkFAeNZycqOg==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwXPTGdPXnVuwSWjYC8jSktEuT6u78lEibKkaw46SeyuSXuEavNdvYn9LpwkKQ6w9kvAD69r3OGV4/bykr++oU=
X-Received: by 2002:a0c:9891:: with SMTP id f17mr369413qvd.49.1561590565954; Wed, 26 Jun 2019 16:09:25 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <MN2PR13MB358267E50BCEB2E7795046B785E50@MN2PR13MB3582.namprd13.prod.outlook.com> <BYAPR05MB5029672CA347E6EC1B94E476C7E40@BYAPR05MB5029.namprd05.prod.outlook.com> <MN2PR13MB358228DB2D7DD56204660F6985E40@MN2PR13MB3582.namprd13.prod.outlook.com> <BYAPR05MB502933857FE0AFBA3390734DC7E40@BYAPR05MB5029.namprd05.prod.outlook.com> <MN2PR13MB3582B880C792E0519A3A91C385E40@MN2PR13MB3582.namprd13.prod.outlook.com> <BYAPR05MB5029581D97C82FA968601CCDC7E70@BYAPR05MB5029.namprd05.prod.outlook.com> <MN2PR13MB35826741E00B40BBFE12616085E70@MN2PR13MB3582.namprd13.prod.outlook.com> <4F580631-0E2D-4311-9EDC-E25A4862DD84@juniper.net> <BYAPR05MB5029D7B984EB0506C7773E63C7E20@BYAPR05MB5029.namprd05.prod.outlook.com> <CAOj+MMH-0qBkaroKJEdtjM1-7-ZjOY1mWBkS7hLo8FOC_5A+Og@mail.gmail.com> <BYAPR05MB50295A1AC3FB482F39249D0AC7E20@BYAPR05MB5029.namprd05.prod.outlook.com> <MN2PR13MB3582DDE034FA9E1C1D4970CD85E20@MN2PR13MB3582.namprd13.prod.outlook.com> <76C21490-A26F-4C88-9F04-FBE6B0F07D41@juniper.net> <MN2PR13MB358203E404B3A94C7D3F15AA85E20@MN2PR13MB3582.namprd13.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <MN2PR13MB358203E404B3A94C7D3F15AA85E20@MN2PR13MB3582.namprd13.prod.outlook.com>
From: Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net>
Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2019 01:09:15 +0200
Message-ID: <CAOj+MME1miW80Ows=L1hx_T4B+596bLmjAeTwvrW0Z5JMY_iKA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Linda Dunbar <linda.dunbar@futurewei.com>
Cc: John Scudder <jgs@juniper.net>, John E Drake <jdrake@juniper.net>, "idr@ietf.org" <idr@ietf.org>, "rtgwg@ietf.org" <rtgwg@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000f7fe89058c4222e9"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/BFrmwjgHVfy62RNj6x1cmRlAreM>
Subject: Re: [Idr] Tunnel-Encap Gaps for SD-WAN described in draft-ietf-rtgwg-net2cloud-gap-analysis-02.txt
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2019 23:09:30 -0000

>
>  I am just curious if all other TLVs/subTLVs of BGP's UPDATEs must be
> present with value NULL (0) to emphasize that it is not accidently omitted?
>

They do not need to be present with NULL (0) value, but no one is drawing
any conclusion on missing attributes. Here you still want to implicitly
take next hops and treat it as tunnel endpoint - as John mentioned that
could be possible if spec would define such behavior when tunnel attribute
is present and Remote Endpoint Sub-TLV is not there. But I am not sure
however if there is sufficient value to it.

[Linda] Isn’t the Source Address of the UPDATE message same as the
> originating node of the UPDATE message?
>

No. Think about going via RRs as a basic example.

Thx,
R.

>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email