IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Idr] Comments on RFC4893

"Samita Chakrabarti" <samitac@ipinfusion.com> Fri, 01 February 2008 20:52 UTC

Return-Path: <idr-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-idr-archive@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-idr-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97FF528C24F; Fri, 1 Feb 2008 12:52:23 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.538
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.538 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.798, BAYES_20=-0.74]
Received: from core3.amsl.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9KlPkKH2AMiA; Fri, 1 Feb 2008 12:52:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: from core3.amsl.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD65D28C3CA; Fri, 1 Feb 2008 12:52:17 -0800 (PST)
X-Original-To: idr@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38D4B28C46B for <idr@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 1 Feb 2008 12:52:15 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
Received: from core3.amsl.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id iBJwNkLVvmOC for <idr@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 1 Feb 2008 12:52:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: from gateway.ipinfusion.com (mail.ipinfusion.com [65.223.109.2]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 232CD28C575 for <idr@ietf.org>; Fri, 1 Feb 2008 12:50:42 -0800 (PST)
Received: from samitacD600 ([10.10.0.157]) by gateway.ipinfusion.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id m11Kq0415533; Fri, 1 Feb 2008 12:52:00 -0800
From: Samita Chakrabarti <samitac@ipinfusion.com>
To: 'Kalpesh Zinjuwadia' <kzinjuwadia@force10networks.com>, idr@ietf.org, quaizar.vohra@gmail.com, enkechen@cisco.com
References: <002f01c8647c$9dafb700$9d000a0a@samitacD600> <44ED058B21DF294ABE394CABE5C1B52102775B3B@EXCH-CLUSTER-03.force10networks.com> <001401c8650b$e8a39760$9d000a0a@samitacD600> <44ED058B21DF294ABE394CABE5C1B52101303B07@EXCH-CLUSTER-03.force10networks.com>
Date: Fri, 01 Feb 2008 12:52:10 -0800
Message-ID: <001e01c86514$53cb1ab0$9d000a0a@samitacD600>
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11
Thread-Index: AchkfJnFg0bX62edRpC+ThO14/0EDgAB9ayQACBsYzAAAi4IsAAA66Kw
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3198
In-Reply-To: <44ED058B21DF294ABE394CABE5C1B52101303B07@EXCH-CLUSTER-03.force10networks.com>
Subject: Re: [Idr] Comments on RFC4893
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/pipermail/idr>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: idr-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: idr-bounces@ietf.org

Hi Kalpesh,



>[SC>]  Yes. We are saying the same thing. But the point is that the RFC
>is
>not very clear about sending/receiving "My ASN" value in the OPEN
>message
>and it should be clarified.
>
><<Kalpesh>> I don't think there is any ambiguity in RFC for this. Can
>you elaborate what's not clear to you?
>

[SC>] 
I'd like to see a section on OPEN message on sending and receiving clearly
for example. I am hearing questions and problems in understanding from the
engineers who are implementing this RFC. I have been involved with IETF
process for a long time and wish to see a revision of this RFC which does
not generate clarification questions for those who did not get involved
during the development of this RFC.


-Samita


_______________________________________________
Idr mailing list
Idr@ietf.org
http://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email