[Idr] Re: draft-peng-idr-segment-routing-te-policy - pre-adoption shepherd's review
liu.yao71@zte.com.cn Mon, 20 May 2024 03:07 UTC
Return-Path: <liu.yao71@zte.com.cn>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41877C14F6BA; Sun, 19 May 2024 20:07:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.192
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.192 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_FONT_FACE_BAD=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BAJS6koco-sZ; Sun, 19 May 2024 20:07:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mxhk.zte.com.cn (mxhk.zte.com.cn [63.216.63.40]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F404CC14F68A; Sun, 19 May 2024 20:07:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mxct.zte.com.cn (unknown [192.168.251.13]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mxhk.zte.com.cn (FangMail) with ESMTPS id 4VjMtS5KBVz8XrX9; Mon, 20 May 2024 11:07:12 +0800 (CST)
Received: from mse-fl1.zte.com.cn (unknown [10.5.228.132]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mxct.zte.com.cn (FangMail) with ESMTPS id 4VjMst4qNdz50FXM; Mon, 20 May 2024 11:06:42 +0800 (CST)
Received: from njy2app03.zte.com.cn ([10.40.13.14]) by mse-fl1.zte.com.cn with SMTP id 44K36ZmF062882; Mon, 20 May 2024 11:06:36 +0800 (+08) (envelope-from liu.yao71@zte.com.cn)
Received: from mapi (njy2app02[null]) by mapi (Zmail) with MAPI id mid203; Mon, 20 May 2024 11:06:37 +0800 (CST)
Date: Mon, 20 May 2024 11:06:37 +0800
X-Zmail-TransId: 2afa664abe3d4de-40ad4
X-Mailer: Zmail v1.0
Message-ID: <20240520110637450ZMsde6WTTwMXcfphIj3Fv@zte.com.cn>
In-Reply-To: <CO1PR08MB6611B7B2D868E8674D07F885B3E32@CO1PR08MB6611.namprd08.prod.outlook.com>
References: CO1PR08MB6611B7B2D868E8674D07F885B3E32@CO1PR08MB6611.namprd08.prod.outlook.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
From: liu.yao71@zte.com.cn
To: shares@ndzh.com
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="=====_001_next====="
X-MAIL: mse-fl1.zte.com.cn 44K36ZmF062882
X-Fangmail-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-Fangmail-MID-QID: 664ABE60.000/4VjMtS5KBVz8XrX9
Message-ID-Hash: CBXPE47SDBUPZK3GP2TO6XAZDEPJABAC
X-Message-ID-Hash: CBXPE47SDBUPZK3GP2TO6XAZDEPJABAC
X-MailFrom: liu.yao71@zte.com.cn
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-idr.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: idr@ietf.org, spring@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc4
Precedence: list
Subject: [Idr] Re: draft-peng-idr-segment-routing-te-policy - pre-adoption shepherd's review
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/BJp-GcahMnivRIwydlIcLDcKjw8>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:idr-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:idr-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:idr-leave@ietf.org>
Hi Sue, 1) v-10 of the draft has been uploaded to address the editorial suggestions based on the shepherd's review. The link is https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-peng-idr-segment-routing-te-policy-attr-10 2) A mail has been sent to SPRING to request for the review on the new segment types on 13,May, no response has been received yet. https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spring/6GFGsD9WG71_fIJruWVV8o9ei7o/ Yao Original From: SusanHares <shares@ndzh.com> To: idr@ietf.org <idr@ietf.org>; Cc: spring@ietf.org <spring@ietf.org>; Date: 2024年05月15日 03:04 Subject: [Idr] draft-peng-idr-segment-routing-te-policy - pre-adoption shepherd's review _______________________________________________ Idr mailing list -- idr@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to idr-leave@ietf.org This is a pre-adoption shepherd’s review from the IDR chairs on the following draft: draft-peng-idr-segment-routing-te-policy-09 https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-peng-idr-segment-routing-te-policy-attr/ What it defines: New Segment types for SR Policy (types L, M, N, O) What IDR drafts augments: draft-ietf-idr-sr-policy-safi-04 (PS, past WG LC ) draft-ietf-idr-bgp-sr-segtypes-ext-03 (experimental, past WG LC) Level: Addition of 4 segment types Technical summary: Technical addition to the existing IDR drafts aligns with the following current IDR specifications. draft-ietf-idr-sr-policy-safi-04 (PS, past WG LC ) draft-ietf-idr-bgp-sr-segtypes-ext-03 (experimental, past WG LC) WG Dependency: Spring check done on version -03 in 2022: https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spring/NHsissUWbak5EqRhswutqLWiwr4/ Discussion between author (Yao Liu) and Ketan Talaulikar 2024 Spring Review is required prior to adoption into IDR. IDR adoption can work in parallel to call in Spring WG. Adoption call ETA: 5/17/2024 Editorial review: #1. Section 3.1, 3.2, 3.3, and 3.4 hg Current text:/ Flags: 1 octet of flags as defined in [I-D.ietf-idr-bgp-sr-segtypes-ext]. / Suggested new text: Flags: 1 octet of flags as defined in section 2.10 of [I-D.ietf-idr-bgp-sr-segtypes-ext]. /