IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Idr] WG adoption call for draft-abraitis-bgp-version-capability-08, to end September 25

Randy Bush <randy@psg.com> Thu, 24 September 2020 19:44 UTC

Return-Path: <randy@psg.com>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC3F73A1256; Thu, 24 Sep 2020 12:44:45 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id eImxqRj5qle2; Thu, 24 Sep 2020 12:44:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ran.psg.com (ran.psg.com [IPv6:2001:418:8006::18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A90D23A1226; Thu, 24 Sep 2020 12:44:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=ryuu.rg.net) by ran.psg.com with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <randy@psg.com>) id 1kLXAY-0003xB-40; Thu, 24 Sep 2020 19:44:42 +0000
Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2020 12:44:41 -0700
Message-ID: <m2sgb7ufh2.wl-randy@psg.com>
From: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
To: John Scudder <jgs=40juniper.net@dmarc.ietf.org>
Cc: Donatas Abraitis <donatas.abraitis@hostinger.com>, IDR List <idr@ietf.org>, Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net>
In-Reply-To: <7D708298-F795-498B-AE17-84BDA07DD10B@juniper.net>
References: <FCC634B7-613F-46EC-9597-7D830A720E5F@juniper.net> <B69D5A7F-6933-433C-A9D6-77443F883A28@hostinger.com> <7D708298-F795-498B-AE17-84BDA07DD10B@juniper.net>
User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.15.9 (Almost Unreal) Emacs/26.3 Mule/6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO)
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI-EPG 1.14.7 - "Harue")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-2022-JP"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/BN9LtVscUqS1wmMbbp_pc9aW-10>
Subject: Re: [Idr] WG adoption call for draft-abraitis-bgp-version-capability-08, to end September 25
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2020 19:44:46 -0000

> I hope Robert will provide his own elaboration, but from context what
> I think he meant is something along the lines of “maybe the transport
> for the information doesn’t end up being a Capability, but <foo>”.

and we could try to organize the philosophy (he said, trying to avoid
the term 'architicture') of which of the half dozen hack transports
are used for what kind of purpose.

randy

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email