Re: [Idr] status - incremental 4/8/2020 -

"Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com> Wed, 08 April 2020 13:00 UTC

Return-Path: <acee@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BACE3A0A2E for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 8 Apr 2020 06:00:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -9.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com header.b=HxIOVnep; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com header.b=qSa8nPMs
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pG1xMOf9n94N for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 8 Apr 2020 05:59:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-1.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-1.cisco.com [173.37.86.72]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 615DA3A0A29 for <idr@ietf.org>; Wed, 8 Apr 2020 05:59:58 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=31759; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1586350798; x=1587560398; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:references:in-reply-to: mime-version; bh=A5jTp6mjXFTpOzJgFfaByvHykpx8lO4nGIKQm3hRz3U=; b=HxIOVnep7COZKLFCV5S+VyVWvQw41BH0Jq5CiZq/EgnilD6unS8e1dcA Loxqx4PRRGxHYjjlKzblYR+0AS/CLFRYCJQ+VQipAvnsfWspHccZNH9AD awCERL4UV/Jg+74mnxNjkds5jzI/GQAiJYsy7bMmfa2bjmkk5lbu8QwKU 8=;
IronPort-PHdr: =?us-ascii?q?9a23=3AMqGNIRVx+uH1o9GkVHo3nSHoAZbV8LGuZFwc94?= =?us-ascii?q?YnhrRSc6+q45XlOgnF6O5wiEPSANiJ8OpK3uzRta2oGXcN55qMqjgjSNRNTF?= =?us-ascii?q?dEwd4TgxRmBceEDUPhK/u/Zic3EexJVURu+DewNk0GUMs=3D?=
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A0AIBAAoyo1e/4MNJK1mGwEBAQEBAQE?= =?us-ascii?q?FAQEBEQEBAwMBAQGBe4ElL1AFbFggBAsqCoQSg0UDimtOgWwlgQGXH4JSA1Q?= =?us-ascii?q?KAQEBDAEBIwoCBAEBhEQCF4FwJDgTAgMBAQsBAQUBAQECAQUEbYVWDIVwAQE?= =?us-ascii?q?BAQMSER0BATgPAgEIDgMDAQIhCgICAjAdCAEBBAESIoMEAYF+TQMuAQ6lVgK?= =?us-ascii?q?BOYhidYEygn8BAQWBQ0FBgnkYgg0DBoE4jDMaggCBEScMEIIYNT6BBIFjAgM?= =?us-ascii?q?BgXgJDYJlMoIsjgASgnuGBZoiCoI9h3WPQB2CTog6hF+MIYRdil+JKJMDAgQ?= =?us-ascii?q?CBAUCDgEBBYFpIoFXcBU7KgGCPlAYDZEiDAwLg1CFFIVBdIEpjRkBgQ8BAQ?=
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.72,358,1580774400"; d="scan'208,217";a="743637650"
Received: from alln-core-1.cisco.com ([173.36.13.131]) by rcdn-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA; 08 Apr 2020 12:59:56 +0000
Received: from XCH-RCD-001.cisco.com (xch-rcd-001.cisco.com [173.37.102.11]) by alln-core-1.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 038CxutF030224 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Wed, 8 Apr 2020 12:59:56 GMT
Received: from xhs-aln-002.cisco.com (173.37.135.119) by XCH-RCD-001.cisco.com (173.37.102.11) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2; Wed, 8 Apr 2020 07:59:56 -0500
Received: from xhs-rcd-002.cisco.com (173.37.227.247) by xhs-aln-002.cisco.com (173.37.135.119) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2; Wed, 8 Apr 2020 07:59:56 -0500
Received: from NAM11-DM6-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (72.163.14.9) by xhs-rcd-002.cisco.com (173.37.227.247) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2 via Frontend Transport; Wed, 8 Apr 2020 07:59:56 -0500
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=aHHdKhAqWUtdUpr3lj4proks02ITEeIwyOAr3tmUPasM+/n8dzChUmayJkJFt1dOkwTbggBUhOhajMhtqNNs/wKu36k1oKQfSZsVz78kwHViCx1SQy4yOf1G3+KscNUutBr4ewrr6crKQwBJOpT8jIquFDQifMqEizbVp7ha0APySokAY9azi/Kc7vaPZkhecjFcNOe5sCb8c9qgv4L0sptog2ayJjvFtStvzaa6QO3k3M5TFoVj8ppzMHWvqmeQfClmJBRuNzEFvjpB1EoZPcPwavSMZJJmAsM5v0xa/pLr2gzHZGMmPz9o9JYFplcWbUlMsEafwp3yuyPy0/zqWw==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=A5jTp6mjXFTpOzJgFfaByvHykpx8lO4nGIKQm3hRz3U=; b=oZJaWiyBSaIQS7tuQniyBSrp5E7pfOc63bz8O2Mu/6kChfYfq5E7YqPdt+bRz/EUC+tx5jxxI/QEWFTQYdyiPqaBc39Mg4QEu/FrG7tuz/7O7PBl/sRMA09gAiw7uxqSF+HRJmXNMmmDIfrza1DI8fdAAVYIqeVepEMEqDvsryxvsm/ce50BVveyr2t5VmJgTURR7T9v37ZizAOQ7rAYRB0Kxila8TTRS3SAreA9HEA5d53vhzdONNKH4UYXJS5Zrp4aC+1AHsruKslmpTtObDRS/bAXMxKIQnYcDzkhL33LVfmhloOh6x9v/+/u3Xel7TFcrkrUV2NH/4zoL3ATEA==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=cisco.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=cisco.com; dkim=pass header.d=cisco.com; arc=none
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector2-cisco-onmicrosoft-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=A5jTp6mjXFTpOzJgFfaByvHykpx8lO4nGIKQm3hRz3U=; b=qSa8nPMsvkCXznuhgTNgL96eCgXxeq3yELEPQ0c/kcbs+b3fX8CunHAYKtL2UMM+GaI+dQTlF2rN/+uAE8mHILQ2CjrUnm9aoYuF2B/53mxqSFw/x5UqQHzM214AhVpuOZcZKjnHwEhb5PO8Sbdt3WSrjk3taCYPgv0nMeRGXtw=
Received: from BN8PR11MB3794.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:408:8f::13) by BN8PR11MB3651.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:408:81::10) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.2878.20; Wed, 8 Apr 2020 12:59:55 +0000
Received: from BN8PR11MB3794.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::55b2:c415:675f:5fb7]) by BN8PR11MB3794.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::55b2:c415:675f:5fb7%3]) with mapi id 15.20.2878.018; Wed, 8 Apr 2020 12:59:55 +0000
From: "Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com>
To: Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com>, "idr@ietf.org" <idr@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Idr] status - incremental 4/8/2020 -
Thread-Index: AdYNokgRyeOIrfLpRmOFOKAsBaX81v//w5KA
Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2020 12:59:54 +0000
Message-ID: <DDB167A3-977A-4815-AE9B-C5D404816CAE@cisco.com>
References: <008901d60da2$74031370$5c093a50$@ndzh.com>
In-Reply-To: <008901d60da2$74031370$5c093a50$@ndzh.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/16.35.20030802
authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=acee@cisco.com;
x-originating-ip: [136.56.133.70]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: c190057b-450f-45f4-8038-08d7dbbcbc00
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: BN8PR11MB3651:
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <BN8PR11MB365117BD106E0B46A3F4433FC2C00@BN8PR11MB3651.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:8273;
x-forefront-prvs: 0367A50BB1
x-forefront-antispam-report: CIP:255.255.255.255; CTRY:; LANG:en; SCL:1; SRV:; IPV:NLI; SFV:NSPM; H:BN8PR11MB3794.namprd11.prod.outlook.com; PTR:; CAT:NONE; SFTY:; SFS:(10009020)(4636009)(396003)(136003)(376002)(366004)(346002)(39860400002)(478600001)(71200400001)(91956017)(81156014)(6512007)(66946007)(66476007)(76116006)(186003)(6506007)(6486002)(2616005)(66446008)(8676002)(53546011)(26005)(64756008)(316002)(36756003)(110136005)(33656002)(66556008)(5660300002)(86362001)(9326002)(81166007)(8936002)(2906002); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: cisco.com does not designate permitted sender hosts)
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0;
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: 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
x-ms-exchange-antispam-messagedata: dHSbuRay8rLt5kZCwf93rhBugCgdZsleShYSID8itILkcibUrmTlwSHHtwT9wkfFFOYmFPCH6Co+nLqqLOnqJ7mVUnAXZsKUWxVcTaMhKA4cYsXdcHDkRt3mU45b0pcTlwYkyJpV+L7AXXfj0M0/Dg==
x-ms-exchange-transport-forked: True
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_DDB167A3977A4815AE9BC5D404816CAEciscocom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: c190057b-450f-45f4-8038-08d7dbbcbc00
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 08 Apr 2020 12:59:54.9379 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 5ae1af62-9505-4097-a69a-c1553ef7840e
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: OfnvBxUsnJ4zkzNe3dSIfsWEbnaaWIvkFhJUSlgXKkM6dg+ypsfnIq59oDoNp3ao
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: BN8PR11MB3651
X-OriginatorOrg: cisco.com
X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 173.37.102.11, xch-rcd-001.cisco.com
X-Outbound-Node: alln-core-1.cisco.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/BQD1HuJZw9qjZToj90m8uncdSNI>
Subject: Re: [Idr] status - incremental 4/8/2020 -
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Apr 2020 13:00:01 -0000

Hi Sue,
One clarification…

From: Idr <idr-bounces@ietf.org> on behalf of Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com>
Date: Wednesday, April 8, 2020 at 8:40 AM
To: IDR List <idr@ietf.org>
Subject: [Idr] status - incremental 4/8/2020 -

IDR WG:

A little status to read with your coffee this morning.   We have an interim at 13:00 UTC (9:00 EDT,  6:00 PDT, 21:00 Bejing time)

Please let me know if I’ve missed any updates.

Cheers, Sue

---------
At IESG in IETF LC
1) draft-ietf-idr-rfc5575bis-19.txt –
    Shepherd: John Scudder
    Status:  IETF LC ended, IESG telechat: 4/15
    IESG Publication request: 7/9/2019
   2  AD Reviews [8/2-9/10/2019, [1/17-1/23/2020]

2) draft-ietf-idr-bgp-ls-segment-routing-msd-08.txt
     [Shepherd: Susan Hares]
     Status:  3rd round of AD revisions
     IESG Publication requested:  10/15/2019

     IETF WG LC:  6 days

--------------
AD review – authors need to respond
1) draft-ietf-idr-tunnel-encaps-14<https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-idr-tunnel-encaps/> - sent to IESG
[Waiting 47 days]

So, this draft requires a response from the authors to Alvaro? It hasn’t gone to full IESG yet – right? We have a couple LSR drafts with a normative reference.

Thanks,
Acee

2) draft-ietf-idr-capabilities-registry-change-05.txt
[Waiting 57 days]
------------
WG past WG LC – stuck  waiting for implementation reports on wiki
[reported to have 2 implementations, but no details on wiki]

1) draft-ietf-idr-ext-opt-param
2) draft-idr-eag-distribution-09.txt
---------
Drafts stuck post WG LC – waiting for minor edits
1) draft-ietf-idr-rfc8203bis.05.txt  -
----
Flow specification drafts in WG LC

1) Draft-ietf-idr-flow-spec-v6-10.txt
   Status: restarted [4/8 to 4/22]
   Status: IESG desires, but is it ready?
   Needed:  implementation reports

2) draft-ietf-idr-bgp-flowspec-oid-11<https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-idr-bgp-flowspec-oid/>
    Status:  3/13/ to 4/13
    Status: light response, please comment
    Authors:  Please fill out implementation report

-----------
WG Adoption calls:

   1) Draft-hujun-idr-bgp-ipsec
       WG adoption:  3/30-4/13
        Shepherd: Susan Hares
        Comment: only 1 response, heading toward “no consensus”

2) draft-hujun-idr-bgp-ipsec-transport-mode
     WG Adoption: 3/30 – 4/13
      Shepherd: Susan Hares
     Comment: only 1 response, heading toward “no consensus”

3) draft-li-idr-sr-policy-path-mtu-03.txt
    WG adoption: 3/30 – 4/13
     Shepherd: Susan Hares
    Comment: Positive response: Heading toward WG Adoption

Request for input:
----------------------
draft-scharf-tcpm-yang-tcp-04

Proposed WG LC drafts for flow-specification that were on hold:
-------------------------------------------
[Authors should contact chairs]

1)  draft-ietf-idr-flowspec-interfaceset-05 –
WG notes indicated this might go ahead without flow-specification v2

2) draft-ietf-idr-flowspec-path-redirect-10 –
WG discussion needs to occur on whether flowspecification


Proposed WG LCs (3/30 and 4/8)
----------------
1) draft-ietf-idr-bgp-open-policy-08 – on hold pending  revision -09
2)  draft-ietf-idr-flowspec-l2vpn-13 – in slides for 4/8


Proposed Adoption calls
-----------------------
draft-cl-idr-bgp-ext-com-registry-udpate-00.txt