Re: [Idr] Warren Kumari's No Objection on draft-ietf-idr-flow-spec-v6-19: (with COMMENT)

Susan Hares <> Thu, 05 November 2020 01:04 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3B753A1200; Wed, 4 Nov 2020 17:04:08 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.948
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.948 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DOS_OUTLOOK_TO_MX=2.845, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jMLQy1mosyrU; Wed, 4 Nov 2020 17:04:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0E1B13A10C0; Wed, 4 Nov 2020 17:03:56 -0800 (PST)
X-Default-Received-SPF: pass (skip=forwardok (res=PASS)) x-ip-name=;
From: "Susan Hares" <>
To: "'Warren Kumari'" <>, "'The IESG'" <>
Cc: <>, <>, <>, "'Jie Dong'" <>, <>, <>, <>
References: <>
In-Reply-To: <>
Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2020 20:03:50 -0500
Message-ID: <06de01d6b30f$867bccf0$937366d0$>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Content-Language: en-us
Thread-Index: AQHQI2fdV/hNF/H+PlBhmoj0Z45RRanFzzig
X-Antivirus: AVG (VPS 201104-7, 11/04/2020), Outbound message
X-Antivirus-Status: Not-Tested
Archived-At: <>
Subject: Re: [Idr] Warren Kumari's No Objection on draft-ietf-idr-flow-spec-v6-19: (with COMMENT)
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Nov 2020 01:04:09 -0000


Thank you for reading the response to Qin's question on v6.   It has been a long journey to the revision to the flow specification work approved.   Can you provide an operational example for Ben's concern? 

Thank you, Sue  

-----Original Message-----
From: Warren Kumari via Datatracker [] 
Sent: Wednesday, November 4, 2020 4:16 PM
To: The IESG
Cc:;;; Jie Dong;;;;
Subject: Warren Kumari's No Objection on draft-ietf-idr-flow-spec-v6-19: (with COMMENT)

Warren Kumari has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-idr-flow-spec-v6-19: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.)

Please refer to
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.

The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:


Thanks to Qin Wu for the OpsDir review. if Qin hadn't asked the "why isn't this folded into the upcoming -bis" (and Christoph's answer) I would have had to ballot DISCUSS.

I do support Ben's DISCUSS, and, even more, Eric's