From nobody Wed Nov 4 17:04:13 2020 Return-Path: X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3B753A1200; Wed, 4 Nov 2020 17:04:08 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 0.948 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.948 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DOS_OUTLOOK_TO_MX=2.845, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jMLQy1mosyrU; Wed, 4 Nov 2020 17:04:07 -0800 (PST) Received: from hickoryhill-consulting.com (50-245-122-97-static.hfc.comcastbusiness.net [50.245.122.97]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0E1B13A10C0; Wed, 4 Nov 2020 17:03:56 -0800 (PST) X-Default-Received-SPF: pass (skip=forwardok (res=PASS)) x-ip-name=50.107.115.222; From: "Susan Hares" To: "'Warren Kumari'" , "'The IESG'" Cc: , , , "'Jie Dong'" , , , References: <160452457177.31420.13870992674907142520@ietfa.amsl.com> In-Reply-To: <160452457177.31420.13870992674907142520@ietfa.amsl.com> Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2020 20:03:50 -0500 Message-ID: <06de01d6b30f$867bccf0$937366d0$@ndzh.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0 Content-Language: en-us Thread-Index: AQHQI2fdV/hNF/H+PlBhmoj0Z45RRanFzzig X-Antivirus: AVG (VPS 201104-7, 11/04/2020), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Not-Tested X-Authenticated-User: skh@ndzh.com Archived-At: Subject: Re: [Idr] Warren Kumari's No Objection on draft-ietf-idr-flow-spec-v6-19: (with COMMENT) X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Nov 2020 01:04:09 -0000 Warren:=20 Thank you for reading the response to Qin's question on v6. It has = been a long journey to the revision to the flow specification work = approved. Can you provide an operational example for Ben's concern?=20 Thank you, Sue =20 -----Original Message----- From: Warren Kumari via Datatracker [mailto:noreply@ietf.org]=20 Sent: Wednesday, November 4, 2020 4:16 PM To: The IESG Cc: draft-ietf-idr-flow-spec-v6@ietf.org; idr-chairs@ietf.org; = idr@ietf.org; Jie Dong; aretana.ietf@gmail.com; jie.dong@huawei.com; = bill.wu@huawei.com; opsdir@ietf.org Subject: Warren Kumari's No Objection on draft-ietf-idr-flow-spec-v6-19: = (with COMMENT) Warren Kumari has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-idr-flow-spec-v6-19: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all = email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this = introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to = https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-idr-flow-spec-v6/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Thanks to Qin Wu for the OpsDir review. if Qin hadn't asked the "why = isn't this folded into the upcoming -bis" (and Christoph's answer) I = would have had to ballot DISCUSS. I do support Ben's DISCUSS, and, even more, Eric's