[Idr] 2 week adoption call for draft-wang-idr-eag-distribution-02 (5/22 to 6/5)

"Susan Hares" <shares@ndzh.com> Fri, 22 May 2015 11:26 UTC

Return-Path: <shares@ndzh.com>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 271121A8978 for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 22 May 2015 04:26:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -96.354
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-96.354 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.8, DOS_OUTLOOK_TO_MX=2.845, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rF-uCZDDpXW7 for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 22 May 2015 04:26:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from hickoryhill-consulting.com (hhc-web3.hickoryhill-consulting.com [64.9.205.143]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 021131A8851 for <idr@ietf.org>; Fri, 22 May 2015 04:26:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Default-Received-SPF: pass (skip=loggedin (res=PASS)) x-ip-name=174.124.202.180;
From: Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com>
To: idr@ietf.org
Date: Fri, 22 May 2015 07:26:05 -0400
Message-ID: <006f01d09482$17c489c0$474d9d40$@ndzh.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0070_01D09460.90B5F700"
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Thread-Index: AdCUgStIhDpb4dxxSaCmWd/Taovc3A==
Content-Language: en-us
X-Authenticated-User: skh@ndzh.com
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/CLoAq0ZQ6WEaogjp9AZw9XjnILw>
Subject: [Idr] 2 week adoption call for draft-wang-idr-eag-distribution-02 (5/22 to 6/5)
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 22 May 2015 11:26:07 -0000

This begins a 2 week Working Group adoption for
draft-wang-idr-eag-distribution.   You can find the draft at: 

 

http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-wang-idr-eag-distribution/

 

This draft proposes a new BGP-LS 

 

   As MPLS-TE network grows, administrative Groups advertised as a
   fixed-length 32-bit Bitmask is quite constraining.  "Extended
   Administrative Group" IGP TE extensions sub-TLV defined in [RFC7308
<https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7308> ]
   is introduced to provide for additional administrative groups (link
   colors) beyond the current limit of 32.

 

 

   The EAG TLV is used in addition to the Administrative Groups when a
   node wants to advertise more than 32 colors for a link.  The EAG TLV
   is optional.  The format and semantics of the 'value' fields in EAG
   TLVs correspond to the format and semantics of value fields in IGP
   extension sub-TLVs, defined in [RFC7308
<https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7308> ].
 
   +------------+---------------------+--------------+-----------------+
   |  TLV Code  |     Description     |     IS-IS    |   Defined in:   |
   |    Point   |                     |  TLV/Sub-TLV |                 |
   +------------+---------------------+--------------+-----------------+
   |    xxxx    |       Extended      |     22/xx    |    [RFC7308
<https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7308> ]    |
   |            |      Admin Group    |              |                 |
   +------------+---------------------+--------------+-----------------+

 

Please in your comments include "support" or "no support" for this draft. 

 

Sue Hares and John Scudder.