[Idr] Last mile for WGLC on draft-ietf-bess-evpn-ipvpn-interworking-04 => need IDR review

slitkows.ietf@gmail.com Mon, 04 January 2021 11:23 UTC

Return-Path: <slitkows.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC1B13A0C26; Mon, 4 Jan 2021 03:23:42 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.197
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.197 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mLWERWyV2QdB; Mon, 4 Jan 2021 03:23:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-wr1-x434.google.com (mail-wr1-x434.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::434]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7E76B3A0C25; Mon, 4 Jan 2021 03:23:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-wr1-x434.google.com with SMTP id t16so31808244wra.3; Mon, 04 Jan 2021 03:23:40 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:mime-version:thread-index :content-language; bh=jcTEyQrsYwF3dK2EaTbsqWMptjpM2RMlxn2fcsp6yEI=; b=AcASKpV37eFCNq40Oq/KcWUfEATyaDcK0nPXiAVoDScM1mJszSlNZmGOTLOskQot+Z QqmQQeTo3uu4UpTgGfMKZ2atGeEgpVTXOvVLdUOwJtCquWuVpdUpW67e2DSW+18luRag f6lURcFdhQ7jO7Bsval1uLVUm7jb/sbzQW8usMhnmfao3nziz4VYf6k6Jra+CP6+s9Pg VBZFaeh1LZcJFwBFBLKlkMXgAAJt3MGre3rpWy/FJwRqqZMQuDGig1a+HT5WBkhuaU61 Wc9Q+NsxmG80VslkUbxo654B/M18AUpxZhdv5ZekH7vPQw8CMYYwkwiJRbI+VL3BtcJS Fjsw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:mime-version :thread-index:content-language; bh=jcTEyQrsYwF3dK2EaTbsqWMptjpM2RMlxn2fcsp6yEI=; b=K7lQuXZ7K+tE6ne2ItfRQExrEM+BfuyRdpP3s7U7T2KGmmRDJ3hmT2iyRHCRtQC7po /SD7JAHT6uuGXh2TIGRX2VMPexEwPbmObUsvkM8VecunkqxKXGmvBAdye22dT5/Arjdv FWBGIorZeBFCnwicXk4xvGFx/rhkHy6JwWMC7f2osW+vjWCyztWv20b5rThiCx0Ck9Bp nY2fvW3U74LSsjdtfb/bzl5gYBwAlE7EDq2aJeE+Hf1fsdgrjYFQGgNxsGjznlnSJGZ+ 0zF4jbW+ZjOnha3zPUEkIg5QC9Tzn0hBFicAPoycK1/9f11s6OQwIf4EszMLb5DaLQ4w Yk1A==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531h9S0jD4FaOGOqGC5F0jblq3FbJ6KPYrEHevsBMWzjM5M52qhH 0xgRAgje5Q1n3X+2vL7GtEoY6vFzAw==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxXLwbltU1L5MliB/Hs1yNoVMxQO1WsifQDBiJvJacKBXDWr/wWnmenkQZ7WeOJg32c+/Amog==
X-Received: by 2002:a5d:4f82:: with SMTP id d2mr79116013wru.87.1609759418746; Mon, 04 Jan 2021 03:23:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: from SLITKOWS3YYU6 ([173.38.220.55]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id i11sm28920138wmq.10.2021.01.04.03.23.37 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 04 Jan 2021 03:23:37 -0800 (PST)
From: <slitkows.ietf@gmail.com>
To: <idr@ietf.org>
Cc: <bess@ietf.org>
Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2021 12:23:36 +0100
Message-ID: <00c301d6e28c$0bda6810$238f3830$@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_00C4_01D6E294.6D9F9360"
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 16.0
Thread-Index: AdbijAs/TknYMGH8Q++aqrJrDjqXWA==
Content-Language: fr
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/COmfTOMZIAumypcSmDkwfDUmYU8>
Subject: [Idr] Last mile for WGLC on draft-ietf-bess-evpn-ipvpn-interworking-04 => need IDR review
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Jan 2021 11:23:43 -0000

Hi IDR WG,

 

We are in the last mile for the WGLC of
draft-ietf-bess-evpn-ipvpn-interworking-04 in BESS WG.

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bess-evpn-ipvpn-interworking

 

Couple of comments from our groups have been already addressed.

 

As BESS WG co-chair, I would like to get your feedback on the document.

 

There are couple of point that need to be looked at:

*	The draft defines a new path attributes DPATH for loop prevention
across "domains" (domain does not mean AS here).
*	It defines some propagation / non propagation rules of attributes by
the gateway PE (in uniform mode). I would like to spot your attention here.
One consequence is that for any new attribute defined in BESS or IDR, we'll
have to define the propagation rules by gateway PEs. I would like to hear
the opinion of the IDR group and IDR chairs on that point.
*	It defines aggregation rules of attributes in the context of the IP
VRF. I would like also to hear opinion from the group and chair on this.  

 

Thanks to provide your feedback as soon as possible (pls cross post in IDR
and BESS).

 

 

Brgds,

 

Stephane