IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Idr] 6PE-Alt draft

Robert Raszuk <raszuk@juniper.net> Mon, 04 February 2008 07:50 UTC

Return-Path: <idr-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-idr-archive@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-idr-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3DE763A6DE7; Sun, 3 Feb 2008 23:50:52 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.498
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.498 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.101, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from core3.amsl.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0n0Bl0WtcRck; Sun, 3 Feb 2008 23:50:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: from core3.amsl.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 672BC3A6DC0; Sun, 3 Feb 2008 23:50:51 -0800 (PST)
X-Original-To: idr@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1687C3A6C96 for <idr@core3.amsl.com>; Sun, 3 Feb 2008 23:50:50 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
Received: from core3.amsl.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8hB6SoO8HB7U for <idr@core3.amsl.com>; Sun, 3 Feb 2008 23:50:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: from exprod7og101.obsmtp.com (exprod7og101.obsmtp.com [64.18.2.155]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A97063A6DC0 for <idr@ietf.org>; Sun, 3 Feb 2008 23:50:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from source ([66.129.224.36]) by exprod7ob101.postini.com ([64.18.6.12]) with SMTP; Sun, 03 Feb 2008 23:52:07 PST
Received: from magenta.juniper.net ([172.17.27.123]) by emailsmtp56.jnpr.net with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Sun, 3 Feb 2008 23:49:50 -0800
Received: from [172.26.250.99] ([172.26.250.99]) by magenta.juniper.net (8.11.3/8.11.3) with ESMTP id m147nmq40988; Sun, 3 Feb 2008 23:49:49 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from raszuk@juniper.net)
Message-ID: <47A6C39A.2010709@juniper.net>
Date: Sun, 03 Feb 2008 23:49:46 -0800
From: Robert Raszuk <raszuk@juniper.net>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (Windows/20071031)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Vishwas Manral <vishwas.ietf@gmail.com>
References: <BAY120-W259B9D353746E33D0864CED8370@phx.gbl> <77ead0ec0801310631r29449dafq961d8a9aecfea098@mail.gmail.com> <77ead0ec0801310700j55f10bcah2aae27dd0fea3927@mail.gmail.com> <BAY120-W1856D92C0C10B950241B43D8370@phx.gbl> <77ead0ec0801310932i5d6ed617j3fe1df7674c0740f@mail.gmail.com> <20080201090733.GA1929@nic.dtag.de> <77ead0ec0802010926k6e57424eoc6ad1328eb65774c@mail.gmail.com> <47A631EC.80703@juniper.net> <77ead0ec0802031455s300978bfn8d10b142376f315@mail.gmail.com> <47A647FA.9040909@juniper.net> <77ead0ec0802032000p4b09c2e4j4f6bbc804a8526a6@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <77ead0ec0802032000p4b09c2e4j4f6bbc804a8526a6@mail.gmail.com>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 04 Feb 2008 07:49:50.0825 (UTC) FILETIME=[858CC590:01C86702]
Cc: idr@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Idr] 6PE-Alt draft
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: raszuk@juniper.net
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/pipermail/idr>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: idr-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: idr-bounces@ietf.org

Hi Vishwas,

What VPN label allocation scheme to use is often left to the operator by 
the CLI. From P router load balancing point of view the worst is per vrf 
granularity ... your draft proposes per PE.

Cheers,
R.

> Hi  Robert/ Martin,
> 
> One more question.
> 
> So are you saying the implementations you know provides a separate
> label for each route, or is it per peer?  I guess it is the later, but
> just want to reconfirm the same.
> 
> Thanks,
> Vishwas
_______________________________________________
Idr mailing list
Idr@ietf.org
http://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email