Re: [Idr] IPR poll for draft-ietf-idr-bgp-ls-segment-routing-msd-05.txt prior to WG LC

"Susan Hares" <> Sat, 08 June 2019 01:20 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2CF7D120141; Fri, 7 Jun 2019 18:20:23 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.948
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.948 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DOS_OUTLOOK_TO_MX=2.845, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id juPkOhaIfj-p; Fri, 7 Jun 2019 18:20:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3FEF8120128; Fri, 7 Jun 2019 18:20:18 -0700 (PDT)
X-Default-Received-SPF: pass (skip=loggedin (res=PASS)) x-ip-name=;
From: Susan Hares <>
To: "'idr@ietf. org'" <>
Date: Fri, 07 Jun 2019 21:20:15 -0400
Message-ID: <06aa01d51d98$54463760$fcd2a620$>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_06AB_01D51D76.CD3581C0"
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Thread-Index: AdUdlwJXOYfwTTVnQeuaqb1Xb1ETJA==
Content-Language: en-us
X-Antivirus: AVG (VPS 190607-4, 06/07/2019), Outbound message
X-Antivirus-Status: Not-Tested
Archived-At: <>
Subject: Re: [Idr] IPR poll for draft-ietf-idr-bgp-ls-segment-routing-msd-05.txt prior to WG LC
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 08 Jun 2019 01:20:24 -0000

Greetings authors: 


I have received IPR Statements from Authors:   Jeff Tantsura, Uma Chunduri,
and Ketan Talaulikar, 

I have not received IPR Statements from Authors::  Greg Mirsky,  Nikos

I have not received IPR Statement from contributor: Siva Sivabalan
We will begin the WG last call after all authors and contributors have
completed the IPR statements. 
In addition, due to the IPR claims listed for this draft, we will need to
make a specific call for objections to the IPR.


I would prefer to make a call for the WGs IPR separate from the WG LC to
keep the technical issues clearly separate from the WG's technical issues.
However, I cannot start either process until all authors and contributors
have sent their IPR statement to the WG. 


For those authors who have requested WG LC, please ask your co-authors and
contributors to submit their IPR Statement quickly.   


We will be entering into a discussion of IDR charter prior to IETF, I want
to get all WG LC started before we start the IDR Charter discussion.   


Cheerily, Susan Hares