[Idr] draft-li-idr-flowspec-rpd-05.txt - WG Adoption call (10/14 to 10/28/2019)

"Susan Hares" <shares@ndzh.com> Mon, 14 October 2019 19:18 UTC

Return-Path: <shares@ndzh.com>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0693120883 for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 14 Oct 2019 12:18:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 3.248
X-Spam-Level: ***
X-Spam-Status: No, score=3.248 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_20=-0.001, DOS_OUTLOOK_TO_MX=2.845, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, KHOP_HELO_FCRDNS=0.4, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id AmIF-MQ7G-tg for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 14 Oct 2019 12:18:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from hickoryhill-consulting.com (50-245-122-100-static.hfc.comcastbusiness.net [50.245.122.100]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 61B0412087B for <idr@ietf.org>; Mon, 14 Oct 2019 12:18:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Default-Received-SPF: pass (skip=loggedin (res=PASS)) x-ip-name=174.25.179.172;
From: "Susan Hares" <shares@ndzh.com>
To: "'idr wg'" <idr@ietf.org>
Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2019 15:18:54 -0400
Message-ID: <015d01d582c4$388e04d0$a9aa0e70$@ndzh.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_015E_01D582A2.B17D4F30"
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Thread-Index: AdWCvtFpBLL09mJXRVKaSdG0p0gs7g==
Content-Language: en-us
X-Antivirus: AVG (VPS 191012-6, 10/12/2019), Outbound message
X-Antivirus-Status: Not-Tested
X-Authenticated-User: skh@ndzh.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/CsMcp_TFx1Ve-1-Oh_5VN5CePPo>
Subject: [Idr] draft-li-idr-flowspec-rpd-05.txt - WG Adoption call (10/14 to 10/28/2019)
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2019 19:19:00 -0000

This begins a 2 week WG adoption call for draft-li-idr-flowspec-rpd-05.txt 

(10/14 to 10/28/2019).  You can access the draft at: 

 

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-li-idr-flowspec-rpd/

 

In your discussion regarding this draft consider if:

 

1)      Passing extended policy in BGP  is useful,

2)      Passing policy in wide community atom is a technical sound
mechanism,

3)      A deployment need exists for this technology. 

 

 

Susan Hares

Co-chair and shepherd