IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Idr] FW: New Version Notification for draft-vandevelde-idr-bgp-ls-segment-routing-rld-01.txt

Jeffrey Haas <jhaas@pfrc.org> Fri, 03 March 2017 20:48 UTC

Return-Path: <jhaas@slice.pfrc.org>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C57FF129602 for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 3 Mar 2017 12:48:28 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.903
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.903 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bFRny4fYSADk for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 3 Mar 2017 12:48:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: from slice.pfrc.org (slice.pfrc.org [67.207.130.108]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E50661293E1 for <idr@ietf.org>; Fri, 3 Mar 2017 12:48:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: by slice.pfrc.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 4A2EC1E32F; Fri, 3 Mar 2017 15:54:19 -0500 (EST)
Date: Fri, 03 Mar 2017 15:54:19 -0500
From: Jeffrey Haas <jhaas@pfrc.org>
To: "Van De Velde, Gunter (Nokia - BE)" <gunter.van_de_velde@nokia.com>
Message-ID: <20170303205419.GA25052@pfrc.org>
References: <148854728632.10105.590253116263033290.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <4BF12F22-F605-406F-9CD8-ACE350B981D0@alcatel-lucent.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <4BF12F22-F605-406F-9CD8-ACE350B981D0@alcatel-lucent.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/CvRX8l47TpDE7oU8ahy7pUNaqBI>
Cc: idr <idr@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Idr] FW: New Version Notification for draft-vandevelde-idr-bgp-ls-segment-routing-rld-01.txt
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Mar 2017 20:48:29 -0000

Gunter,

On Fri, Mar 03, 2017 at 02:55:39PM +0000, Van De Velde, Gunter (Nokia - BE) wrote:
> Heads-up… Happy to learn feedback and comments.
> 
> This draft is short and defines the attribute to use for BGP-LS to expose a 
> node RLD "Readable Label Depth" to a centralised controller (PCE/SDN).

This seems like a good idea.  I was not aware of the work in the other area,
so I believe my primary commment needs to go elsewhere as well:

While it's true that a given node may have a given limit on its readable
depth, this may potentially vary on a per interface basis.  What's the
intent, if any, to accommodate something beyond the least common
denominator?

Editorial nit, your references point to the ospf document twice.

-- Jeff

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email